Rad Plan Minutes 07.10.24: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Proposal Review== | ==Proposal Review== | ||
The 7 Detailed Proposals were summarized (5 min each) and discussed (10-15 min each). | |||
Tech Cmte Maintenance work was estimated at around 5% this year. | |||
* Few CPs in queue, No major CPs, No urgent CPs, Large numbers of CPs not expected | |||
* Some work may be required for NM | |||
* Significant Editing not expected for Spanish or Japanese National Extensions | |||
* German National Extension possible, but likely not until spring | |||
The Proposals with the effort estimates for one or more defined approaches are listed here: | |||
Radiation Dose | Radiation Dose | ||
| Line 44: | Line 54: | ||
Reporting is going to move out of band. | Reporting is going to move out of band. | ||
Revision as of 16:15, 24 October 2007
Attendees:
- Chris Lindop, GE – Radiology Planning Co-chair - voting
- Kevin O’Donnell, Toshiba – Radiology Planning Co-chair, voting
- Ellie Avraham, Carestream - Radiology Technical Co-chair, voting
- Ruth Berge, GE – not voting
- Chris Carr, RSNA, not voting
- David Clunie, RadPharm, voting
- Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA, not voting
- Lynn Felhofer, Technical Project Manager, not voting
- Cindy Levy, Merge, voting
- Cor Loef, Philips, voting by phone – no Webex Access
- John Paganini, Guardian Health, voting
- Dave Robaska, Cerner, voting
- Paul Seifert, Agfa, voting
- Niki Wirsz, Siemens, voting
Proposal Review
The 7 Detailed Proposals were summarized (5 min each) and discussed (10-15 min each).
Tech Cmte Maintenance work was estimated at around 5% this year.
- Few CPs in queue, No major CPs, No urgent CPs, Large numbers of CPs not expected
- Some work may be required for NM
- Significant Editing not expected for Spanish or Japanese National Extensions
- German National Extension possible, but likely not until spring
The Proposals with the effort estimates for one or more defined approaches are listed here:
Radiation Dose
- 25% .......for dose capture and submission to registries
- 30-35% ..to also support download of Dose benchmarks/statistics
Enhanced DICOM
- 35% ......for 3 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine)
- 55% ......for 4 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine, Cardiac Imaging)
Mammo CAD Workflow
- 35% ......Mammo CAD Profile as described (triggers and behaviors)
PDI for Large Datasets
- 30%
Mammo Acquisition Workflow
- 35-45% .....if Profile based on current SWF
- 10-15% .....if just a User's Handbook on how to deploy Mammo Acquisition with the current SWF
Scheduled Workflow 2.0
- 200% ...........SWF II over two years. No public comment this year. Interim Whitepaper for Mammography Acquisition.
- 105%/105% ..Develop Ordering (HL7) this year; Acquisition (DICOM) the next. Risk of missing dependencies.
- 50%/160% ....Develop Use Cases this year; Profile the next year or two.
Critical Results
- N/A
Reporting is going to move out of band.
Work Package Nominations
| Package | Work Items (and % effort) | Ballot 1 | Ballot 2 | Ballot 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Package A | Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%) | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Package B | SWF 50%, Rad Dose 20%, PDI 30% (100%) | 0 | - | - |
| Package C | SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, Enhanced DICOM 35% (100%) | 2 | 2 | - |
| Package D | Rad Dose 30%, Enhanced DICOM 35%, Mammo Acq 15% (80%) | 1 | - | - |
| Package E | Rad Dose 20%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (115%) | 1 | - | - |
| Package F | Enhanced DICOM 55%, PDI 30%, Mammo Acq 15% (100%) | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Package G | Mammo Acq 15%, SWF 50%, Rad Dose 30% (95%) | 1 | - | - |
| Package H | SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (95%) | 0 | - | - |
Selection
Package A: Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%)