Rad Plan Minutes 07.10.24: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Kevino (talk | contribs)
Kevino (talk | contribs)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Attendees:===
===Attendees:===
 
* Chris Lindop, GE – Radiology Planning Co-chair - voting
 
* Kevin O’Donnell, Toshiba – Radiology Planning Co-chair, voting
 
* Ellie Avraham, Carestream - Radiology Technical Co-chair, voting
 
* Ruth Berge, GE – not voting
* Chris Carr, RSNA, not voting
* David Clunie, RadPharm, voting
* Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA, not voting
* Lynn Felhofer, Technical Project Manager, not voting
* Cindy Levy, Merge, voting
* Cor Loef, Philips, voting by phone – no Webex Access
* John Paganini, Guardian Health, voting
* Dave Robaska, Cerner, voting
* Paul Seifert, Agfa, voting
* Niki Wirsz, Siemens, voting


==Proposal Review==
==Proposal Review==

Revision as of 16:04, 24 October 2007

Attendees:

  • Chris Lindop, GE – Radiology Planning Co-chair - voting
  • Kevin O’Donnell, Toshiba – Radiology Planning Co-chair, voting
  • Ellie Avraham, Carestream - Radiology Technical Co-chair, voting
  • Ruth Berge, GE – not voting
  • Chris Carr, RSNA, not voting
  • David Clunie, RadPharm, voting
  • Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA, not voting
  • Lynn Felhofer, Technical Project Manager, not voting
  • Cindy Levy, Merge, voting
  • Cor Loef, Philips, voting by phone – no Webex Access
  • John Paganini, Guardian Health, voting
  • Dave Robaska, Cerner, voting
  • Paul Seifert, Agfa, voting
  • Niki Wirsz, Siemens, voting

Proposal Review

Radiation Dose

  • 25% .......for dose capture and submission to registries
  • 30-35% ..to also support download of Dose benchmarks/statistics

Enhanced DICOM

  • 35% ......for 3 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine)
  • 55% ......for 4 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine, Cardiac Imaging)

Mammo CAD Workflow

  • 35% ......Mammo CAD Profile as described (triggers and behaviors)

PDI for Large Datasets

  • 30%

Mammo Acquisition Workflow

  • 35-45% .....if Profile based on current SWF
  • 10-15% .....if just a User's Handbook on how to deploy Mammo Acquisition with the current SWF

Scheduled Workflow 2.0

  • 200% ...........SWF II over two years. No public comment this year. Interim Whitepaper for Mammography Acquisition.
  • 105%/105% ..Develop Ordering (HL7) this year; Acquisition (DICOM) the next. Risk of missing dependencies.
  • 50%/160% ....Develop Use Cases this year; Profile the next year or two.

Critical Results

  • N/A


Maintenance is estimated at around 5% this year.

  • No major CP, NatExt.

Reporting is going to move out of band.

Work Package Nominations

Package Work Items (and % effort) Ballot 1 Ballot 2 Ballot 3
Package A Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%) 3 5 7
Package B SWF 50%, Rad Dose 20%, PDI 30% (100%) 0 - -
Package C SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, Enhanced DICOM 35% (100%) 2 2 -
Package D Rad Dose 30%, Enhanced DICOM 35%, Mammo Acq 15% (80%) 1 - -
Package E Rad Dose 20%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (115%) 1 - -
Package F Enhanced DICOM 55%, PDI 30%, Mammo Acq 15% (100%) 2 3 3
Package G Mammo Acq 15%, SWF 50%, Rad Dose 30% (95%) 1 - -
Package H SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (95%) 0 - -

Selection

Package A: Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%)