Difference between revisions of "Rad TF Maintenance 2013-14"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
Effort Evaluation (as a % of Tech Cmte Bandwidth): | Effort Evaluation (as a % of Tech Cmte Bandwidth): | ||
− | :* | + | :* 40% |
Responses to Issues: | Responses to Issues: |
Revision as of 08:53, 8 October 2013
Target:
- Publish CP Ballot in early-Jan 2014 (for CPs needed for IHE-Europe Connectathon in April 2014)
- Publish CP Ballot at end-of-April 2014
- Incorporate FT CPs into updated TF released July 2014
Number of outstanding CPs:
- 47 Assigned CPs to work on
- For specifics refer to Tracking Doc and sort by Status
- (about 2/3 are stagnant) Should do a review/triage of dormant CPs and cancel or re-start
- 0 Completed CPs that failed ballot and need to be reworked
- 3 Submitted CPs to review/assign (as of Oct 8 when this was due)
- 268 Missequenced Subsection in Rad-8
- IOCM Series level query clarification
- XDS-I.b Fix Namespaces in Rad69 sample
- XDS-I.b Clarify Coding Scheme Designator
- 10 Final Text CPs to confirm have been incorporated into TF
List of "non-trivial" CPs:
- CP-xxx : Title (Author)
- New CP to refactor Rad-69 - error responses not aligned appropriately
- CP-xxx : Title (Author)
List of outstanding items not yet submitted as CPs:
- 3 more CPs were submitted between Oct 26 and Nov 1
List of other maintenance tasks:
- Cleanup of Cross-Referencing to ITI (they renumbered their sections)
- Adoption of new IHE Templates
- Add 2 FT Supplements to TF (and any made FT next year)
- R2/RE Harmonization?
7. Risks
- Risk of effort spent on updating existing Supplements and TF to match new templates being low return-on-investment.
9. Tech Cmte Evaluation
Effort Evaluation (as a % of Tech Cmte Bandwidth):
- 40%
Responses to Issues:
- See italics in Risk and Open Issue sections
Candidate Editor:
- Kevin O'Donnell