Pharm Tech Minutes 2011.03.24: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
# Workpackages Pharmacy-group | # Workpackages Pharmacy-group | ||
## <u>CMPD</u> | |||
##* None, because just 1 vendor, no testing in Pisa | ##* None, because just 1 vendor, no testing in Pisa | ||
## <u>PRE / PADV / DIS</u> | |||
##* Sample Documents are created and approved by Eric | ##* Sample Documents are created and approved by Eric | ||
##* Test descriptions are written and approved by Eric | ##* Test descriptions are written and approved by Eric | ||
##* Schematrons are written now | ##* Schematrons are written now | ||
##<u> HMW</u> | |||
* Sample HL7 messages for each transaction are created and approved by Eric | * Sample HL7 messages for each transaction are created and approved by Eric | ||
* Test script and description is created and approved by Eric | * Test script and description is created and approved by Eric | ||
* Tests are technically implemented in Gazelle | * Tests are technically implemented in Gazelle | ||
# TCon with participating vendors for reviewing test descriptions at 02.03.2011, 14:00 – 16:00 | # TCon with participating vendors for reviewing test descriptions at 02.03.2011, 14:00 – 16:00 | ||
* Topic: Just HMW | * Topic: Just HMW | ||
* Jose did an introduction to HMW | * Jose did an introduction to HMW | ||
| Line 48: | Line 40: | ||
* Sample messages were promised to vendors and were delivered later | * Sample messages were promised to vendors and were delivered later | ||
* Impression of Jose: Vendors were motivated and very interested. Were eager to get more information about the testing | * Impression of Jose: Vendors were motivated and very interested. Were eager to get more information about the testing | ||
** Luca confirms | |||
## Next CAT | |||
# More accurate testing | # More accurate testing | ||
* Schematron | * Schematron | ||
* Not only “sunny side” scenarios, but more complex ones. Also exceptional cases. | * Not only “sunny side” scenarios, but more complex ones. Also exceptional cases. | ||
# Content requirements for testing will be organized in the manner of PCC (on a dedicated web space, where all resources are available) | # Content requirements for testing will be organized in the manner of PCC (on a dedicated web space, where all resources are available) | ||
Revision as of 19:12, 25 March 2011
Participant list
- Jürgen Brandstätter, CodeWerk, Austria
- Arianna Cocchiglia , Arsenàl.IT , Italy
- Jose Costa Texeira, Agfa Healthcare
- Marco Demarmels, Schweiz
- Ana Estelrich, Phast, France
- Simon Letellier, EAHP, France
- Jacqueline Surugue, FIP, France
- Leonidas Tzimis , EAHP, Greece
- Luca Zalunaro , Arsenàl.IT , Italy
CAT Pisa 2011
First testing of Pharmacy Profiles, Preparation/Todo’s
- Workpackages Pharmacy-group
- CMPD
- None, because just 1 vendor, no testing in Pisa
- PRE / PADV / DIS
- Sample Documents are created and approved by Eric
- Test descriptions are written and approved by Eric
- Schematrons are written now
- HMW
- CMPD
- Sample HL7 messages for each transaction are created and approved by Eric
- Test script and description is created and approved by Eric
- Tests are technically implemented in Gazelle
- TCon with participating vendors for reviewing test descriptions at 02.03.2011, 14:00 – 16:00
- Topic: Just HMW
- Jose did an introduction to HMW
- A document with a common set of values was agreed (drug codes, etc.)
- Sample messages were promised to vendors and were delivered later
- Impression of Jose: Vendors were motivated and very interested. Were eager to get more information about the testing
- Luca confirms
- Next CAT
- More accurate testing
- Schematron
- Not only “sunny side” scenarios, but more complex ones. Also exceptional cases.
- Content requirements for testing will be organized in the manner of PCC (on a dedicated web space, where all resources are available)
- Proper value sets in the manner of the epSOS MVC (Master Value Catalog) will be provided
F2F Meeting: Details, Preparation
+ Proposal Luca: At the end of 2.day: invite vendors to give feedback on their comments during implementation (max. 15min each)
- Previous information will be sent to the vendors
- Simon has the mailing list, Jose and Simon will cover this, make a Doodle about the time:
- Wednesday morning (11:00 - 12:00) - followed by team lunch
- Tuesday morning (11:00 - 12:00) - followed by team lunch
- Tuesday afternoon (13:00 - 14:00)
- During Lunch time wednesday (12:00 - 13:00)
- During Lunch time tuesday (12:00 - 13:00)
- End of day tuesday (17:00 - 18:00)
- End of day tuesday (18:00 - 19:00)
+ Meeting Begin: 09:00 (Tue and Wed) + Meeting End: 18:00 or 19:00 (Tue) and 13:00 (Wed) + Presentation XDW Profile by Luca
- Tue, before lunch, after first coffee break (approx. 1 hour)
+ Proposed Meeting Agenda (early draft)
# Tue
- 9:00-10:00 Greeting
- 10:00-11:00 XDW Profile
- 11:00-12:00 HMW vendors?
- 12:00-13:00 Lunch
- 13:00-18:00 Roadmap: Discussing and Prioritizing of Workpackages for 2011
# Wed
- 09:00-13:00 Roadmap: Discussing and Prioritizing of Workpackages for 2011
- 11:00-12:00 HMW vendors?
Time for Pharmacy-TCons
o Examined Doodle results
o Decision: Alternate times
+ 1) Brussels time: 20:00 (beginning in May)
+ 2) Brussels time: 12:00