QRPH Tech Tcon Minutes 2010-01-29: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New page: ==Attendees== * Mark Aratoon - GE * Robert Barr - Nextrials * Jason Colquitt - Greeeway * Steve Felt - Greenway * Janette Heung - NQF * Jeff James - Cerner * Steve Maxwell - HIMSS * Amit P...
 
 
Line 17: Line 17:
* Mark Aratoon walked group through list of RPE development issues
* Mark Aratoon walked group through list of RPE development issues
* Consider adding a Pub/Sub model for RPE
* Consider adding a Pub/Sub model for RPE
  1.  Expansion of RPE scope to other domains:
        1. Quality
        2. Public Health
        3. Other? (General applicability of transaction workflow?)
  2. Integration with Redaction services
        1. Evaluation of proposed alternative scenarios
        2. Implemented PoC
  3. Transaction refinement
        1. RetrieveProtocolDef
i.      Expanding query criteria
ii.      Returning of lists
        2. Next activity/control of EHR workflow
        3. Need for/role of current optional transactions?
  3. Message content refinement
        2. Simplifications: e.g, study participation -> study design id
        3. Beyond patient demographics? Other CRD-like info upfront?
        4. Place for form ids resolved?
        5. Study site?
        6. Other issues?
  4. Message content transformations
        0. HL7 Study design content/workflow->ODM/TDM
        1. HL7 Study design workflow->BPEL


[[Quality, Research and Public Health Technical Committee]]
[[Quality, Research and Public Health Technical Committee]]


[[Category: Minutes]]
[[Category: Minutes]]

Latest revision as of 13:59, 29 January 2010

Attendees

  • Mark Aratoon - GE
  • Robert Barr - Nextrials
  • Jason Colquitt - Greeeway
  • Steve Felt - Greenway
  • Janette Heung - NQF
  • Jeff James - Cerner
  • Steve Maxwell - HIMSS
  • Amit Popat - Epic
  • Gary Walker - Quintiles
  • Jane Whipple - CDC


Minutes

Status and development planning for Retrieve Protocol for Execution (RPE) Profile.

  • Mark Aratoon walked group through list of RPE development issues
  • Consider adding a Pub/Sub model for RPE


  1.  Expansion of RPE scope to other domains:
        1. Quality
        2. Public Health
        3. Other? (General applicability of transaction workflow?)
  2. Integration with Redaction services
        1. Evaluation of proposed alternative scenarios
        2. Implemented PoC
  3. Transaction refinement
        1. RetrieveProtocolDef

i. Expanding query criteria ii. Returning of lists

        2. Next activity/control of EHR workflow
        3. Need for/role of current optional transactions?
  3. Message content refinement
        2. Simplifications: e.g, study participation -> study design id
        3. Beyond patient demographics? Other CRD-like info upfront?
        4. Place for form ids resolved?
        5. Study site?
        6. Other issues?
  4. Message content transformations
        0. HL7 Study design content/workflow->ODM/TDM
        1. HL7 Study design workflow->BPEL

Quality, Research and Public Health Technical Committee