Rad Plan Future Agenda Topics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
** This overlaps heavily with the issues being considered by IHE Canada/Infoway | ** This overlaps heavily with the issues being considered by IHE Canada/Infoway | ||
*** Try to involve David Heaney, Peter Bak, etc. | *** Try to involve David Heaney, Peter Bak, etc. | ||
* Post-Processing and Reporting Workflow | |||
** Review current status | |||
** Discuss appropriate plans | |||
** Consider using the [[Evaluation of Published Profiles]] Process to organize discussion | |||
== "Parking Lot": For Someday == | == "Parking Lot": For Someday == | ||
Revision as of 15:10, 21 December 2009
Feel free to add proposed agenda items here.
Urgent: For Next Meeting
Try to indicate why it's urgent
Near Term: For Upcoming Meeting
Describe near term topic
- XDS.b Document Management and Privacy
- Review the XDS.b options on the Document Consumer and Document Source
- They address use cases that are analagous for Imaging Reports and Images
- Need to analyze RAD use cases and consider a work item to address them
- Possibly by adopting/tweaking the XDS.b options (e.g., XDS.b named options for the Document Source)
- This overlaps heavily with the issues being considered by IHE Canada/Infoway
- Try to involve David Heaney, Peter Bak, etc.
- Review the XDS.b options on the Document Consumer and Document Source
- Post-Processing and Reporting Workflow
- Review current status
- Discuss appropriate plans
- Consider using the Evaluation of Published Profiles Process to organize discussion
"Parking Lot": For Someday
Review these from time to time for activation
- Targetted Webinar Invites
- Consider identifying profiles we want to specifically promote (e.g. new TI)
- Assemble a mailing list of likely implementers
- Send a targetted email identifying the profile and a bit of a business case and provide info to attend the webinar for the full story.
- NEMA DICOM Library
- Vendors who create objects have not been populating the library
- One reason may be lack of a carrot
- IHE has played with the idea of making Products (vs Prototypes) a more prominant part of Connectathon
- Combining these, perhaps vendors could sign up to do Product Testing vs Prototype Testing (similar to the current supportive vs comprehensive)
- One requirement for passing the Product level could be to post objects to the NEMA Library
- Marketing Review
- Review coverage at relevant conferences and supplement as necessary
- RSNA
- SIIM
- AHRA
- Europe?
- Asia?
- More?
- Review coverage at relevant conferences and supplement as necessary
- Consider refactoring XDS-I.b into:
- An XDS Content profile - for the sharing of the DICOM manifest and the PDF or CDA-wrapped reports
- A "workflow-type" Profile that orchestrates the sharing of the DICOM Manifest with the retrieval of the DICOM objects referenced by the manifest.
- Also consider if/ how XDS-SD (XDS for Scanned Documents) can be used in place of (or in conjunction with) the current specification for sharing reports.