Difference between revisions of "Rad Tech Minutes 2008.10.01"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:* Kevin O'Donnell updated proposal based on input by committee | :* Kevin O'Donnell updated proposal based on input by committee | ||
:* Agreement on Summary and Problem statement | :* Agreement on Summary and Problem statement | ||
− | :* Difficult issues in Key Use Cases impact difficulty of implementation by vendors: | + | :* Difficult issues in '''Key Use Cases''' impact difficulty of implementation by vendors: |
::* Comparison of series | ::* Comparison of series | ||
::* Localization of currently displayed image on orthogonal image | ::* Localization of currently displayed image on orthogonal image | ||
::* Display of laterality of sagittal images (as distinct from orientation of image) | ::* Display of laterality of sagittal images (as distinct from orientation of image) | ||
− | :* Technical Approach is | + | :* '''Technical Approach''' is |
::* Mainly adds functionality to Image Display actor | ::* Mainly adds functionality to Image Display actor | ||
− | ::* Scope of viewer | + | ::* Scope of viewer capabilities to display complex modality images (eg, Nuc Med, ultrasound in scope?) |
::* Need to get input requirements from primary care physicians (neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, etc): adds significantly to development workload | ::* Need to get input requirements from primary care physicians (neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, etc): adds significantly to development workload | ||
− | ::* List of candidate organizations and individuals to invite to meetings | + | ::* List of candidate organizations and individuals to invite to meetings included in proposal |
+ | :* Timeline goal is to be prepared for demonstration at AMA in April 2009 | ||
+ | :* '''Risks''' | ||
+ | ::* Difficulty of sufficiently engaging clinicians and vendors: need to work to get AMA Cmte, MITA Cmte and DICOM subcommittee, as well as DRG and RANZCR | ||
+ | :::* Work on getting input from referring physicians in US, Europe and Japan | ||
+ | :* '''Action Item:''' RSNA will need to immediately engage Media Creator vendors (and any vendors who develop image viewers for them) | ||
+ | |||
Revision as of 10:40, 1 October 2008
Attendees
- David Clunie
- Paul Seifert
- Kevin O'Donnell
- Chris Lindop
- Peter Mildenberger
- Jerry Wallis
- Chris Carr
- Nichole Drye-Mayo
Minutes
Technical Review of Image Sharing Profile Detailed Proposals
1) XDS-I_Using_XDS.b_Technology: Paul Seifert
2) PDI Extensions: David Clunie
3) Basic Image Review: Kevin O'Donnell
- Kevin O'Donnell updated proposal based on input by committee
- Agreement on Summary and Problem statement
- Difficult issues in Key Use Cases impact difficulty of implementation by vendors:
- Comparison of series
- Localization of currently displayed image on orthogonal image
- Display of laterality of sagittal images (as distinct from orientation of image)
- Technical Approach is
- Mainly adds functionality to Image Display actor
- Scope of viewer capabilities to display complex modality images (eg, Nuc Med, ultrasound in scope?)
- Need to get input requirements from primary care physicians (neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, etc): adds significantly to development workload
- List of candidate organizations and individuals to invite to meetings included in proposal
- Timeline goal is to be prepared for demonstration at AMA in April 2009
- Risks
- Difficulty of sufficiently engaging clinicians and vendors: need to work to get AMA Cmte, MITA Cmte and DICOM subcommittee, as well as DRG and RANZCR
- Work on getting input from referring physicians in US, Europe and Japan
- Action Item: RSNA will need to immediately engage Media Creator vendors (and any vendors who develop image viewers for them)
4) XCA-I: Chris Lindop, Claudio Saccavini; request help from Rob Horn, Dave Heaney
5) Image Management Enhancements: Dave Heaney requested to undertake if profile to go forward
6) SWFII - Phase 2: Chris Lindop