HL7 Review Task Force 2008-06-27: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Revision as of 10:53, 27 June 2008
Attendees
Yongjian Bao PhD, GE Chris Lindop, GE Lisa Spellman, HIMSS Chris Carr, RSNA Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA
Minutes
Reconciling PAM and SWF
- Comparison of Trigger Events
- Yongjian Bao provided a [[spreadsheet comparing trigger events in SWF and PAM
- Work through with Task Force on Next tcon
Cleaning Up Inconsistencies in Text about HL7 Versioning in Rad TF and ITI TF
- Comparison of Rad TF section 2.3 and 2.4 (Message Control and Conventions) with ITI TF Appendix C
- Goal to develop shared, consistent text on managing version differences
- Needs a clear statement on how HL7 version number attribute is defined and handled
- Clarify requirements for acknowledgment mode for both sender and received side (currently only defined for receiver)
- Clarify notation and other inconsistencies in the texts
- Use Rad TF text as a basis for normative text for systems using HL7 v. 2.3.1 and use ITI TF Appendix C as starting point for rules about using HL7 v 2.5
- Goal is to have a section of ITI TF as the "canonical" statement of managing HL7 versions; Rad TF and others (Eye Care, Cardio, etc) would reference this section
- Goal to develop shared, consistent text on managing version differences
Next Meeting
- Thursday, July 17, 9am CDT
- PAM vs SWF: Comparison of Trigger Events
- Proposal for reconciling text on handling HL7 versions in ITI and Rad TFs