BIR FT Evaluation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Stevenichols (talk | contribs) |
Stevenichols (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:::* <font color="blue">CP-RAD-212</font> | :::* <font color="blue">CP-RAD-212</font> | ||
:::* CP-RAD-337 | :::* CP-RAD-337 | ||
* Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"? | * Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"? | ||
| Line 21: | Line 20: | ||
* Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed? | * Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed? | ||
::* Yes | ::* Yes | ||
* Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with? | * Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with? | ||
:: BIR has been tested 19 times since 2011 | :: BIR has been tested 19 times since 2011 | ||
| Line 34: | Line 32: | ||
* Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions? | * Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions? | ||
::* Yes | ::* Yes | ||
Eur. 2011 Eur. 2012 Eur. 2014 | |Eur. 2011 |Eur. 2012 |Eur. 2014 |Eur. 2015 |Eur. 2016 |NA 2011 |NA 2012 |NA 2014 | ||
----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------- --------- --------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------- --------- --------- | ||
Akgün Bilgisayar Program ve Hizmetleri San. Tic. Ltd. Sti. IM | Akgün Bilgisayar Program ve Hizmetleri San. Tic. Ltd. Sti. | |IM | IM | | | | | | ||
Cerner Corporation IM | Cerner Corporation IM | ||
EBM technologies IM | EBM technologies IM | ||
| Line 55: | Line 53: | ||
Rogan-Delft ID | Rogan-Delft ID | ||
ID | ID | ||
* Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon? | * Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon? | ||
::* | ::* Yes, see above | ||
* Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested? | * Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested? | ||
::* Yes, but limited Image Display testing | ::* Yes, but limited Image Display testing | ||
Revision as of 14:55, 8 February 2023
Proposal
Basic Image Review (BIR) has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Steve Nichols) Per the Final Text Process, Items in blue text below warrant Committee discussion.
Technical Committee Checklist
- Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"
- Yes. All NMI CPs identified and addressed. See CP Tracking Spreadsheet
- CP-RAD-206
- CP-RAD-209
- CP-RAD-210
- CP-RAD-211
- CP-RAD-212
- CP-RAD-337
- Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
- No CPs indicated in trial implementation
- Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
- CP-RAD-212 is still open
- Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
- Yes
- Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?
- BIR has been tested 19 times since 2011
- Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
- see above
Technical Committee Consensus
- TBD
Planning Committee Checklist
- Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?
- Yes
|Eur. 2011 |Eur. 2012 |Eur. 2014 |Eur. 2015 |Eur. 2016 |NA 2011 |NA 2012 |NA 2014
----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ---------
Akgün Bilgisayar Program ve Hizmetleri San. Tic. Ltd. Sti. | |IM | IM | | | | |
Cerner Corporation IM
EBM technologies IM
Ekstrem Bir Bilgisayar IM
EMC IM
GE Precision Healthcare LLC IM
Global Imaging OnLine IM
J4Care GmbH IM
Karos Health IM
medavis GmbH IM
meddata bilisim ltd.sti.(Meddata information technololgy). IM
MILLENSYS IM
Sisoft Saglik Bilgi Sistemleri (Healthcare Information Systems) IM
Topicus Zorg IM
Turmap Information Technologies IM
Visbion Ltd IM IM
EBM technologies ID
Rogan-Delft ID
ID
- Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?
- Yes, see above
- Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
- Yes, but limited Image Display testing
- Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
- NA
- Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
- EVS DICOM validators
- Test .iso files
- Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
- Yes
- (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)
- TBD
- Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?
- TBD
- Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page overview of the profile
- Yes, see Basic Image Review