Card Tech Minutes 2017.11.08: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:The profile they submitted is a potential multi-year effort. This may be included in the white paper that we are considering developing. The first step would be assess the current workflows, as opposed to the workflows that existed 10+ years ago when the profile was created. This also may help provide direction for updating the other profiles. | :The profile they submitted is a potential multi-year effort. This may be included in the white paper that we are considering developing. The first step would be assess the current workflows, as opposed to the workflows that existed 10+ years ago when the profile was created. This also may help provide direction for updating the other profiles. | ||
:'''White Paper''' | :'''White Paper''' | ||
:The Planning Committee likes the idea | :The Planning Committee likes the idea of the Send invite to committee | ||
Send invite to committee | :'''Structural Heart Update''' | ||
: | |||
:'''Face to Face Meeting, Dec 11-13, 2017''' | |||
:Chris will develop a draft agenda for the December meeting. Charles will create an updated spreadsheet with the TAVR indications. | |||
:'''CPN Clinical Companion Guide Proposal''' | |||
:Rebecca developed a proposal to address the declining interest in profile implementation. Historically, the documents are primarily technical in detail. This guide is intended to provide information that is useful for clinicians to understand how this could benefit them and their patients. This guide is also intended to provide details useful for the C-suite. This could help identify opportunities for implementation. We may need examples of clinical data and its implementation for the various procedures. | |||
Revision as of 10:43, 8 November 2017
Attendees
- Chris Melo, Co-chair, Philips Healthcare
- Paul Dow, Secretary, ACC
- Charles Thomas, University of Washington
- Dan Murphy, Epic
- Rebecca Baker, ACC
Minutes
- IHE-Japan
- The profile they submitted is a potential multi-year effort. This may be included in the white paper that we are considering developing. The first step would be assess the current workflows, as opposed to the workflows that existed 10+ years ago when the profile was created. This also may help provide direction for updating the other profiles.
- White Paper
- The Planning Committee likes the idea of the Send invite to committee
- Structural Heart Update
- Face to Face Meeting, Dec 11-13, 2017
- Chris will develop a draft agenda for the December meeting. Charles will create an updated spreadsheet with the TAVR indications.
- CPN Clinical Companion Guide Proposal
- Rebecca developed a proposal to address the declining interest in profile implementation. Historically, the documents are primarily technical in detail. This guide is intended to provide information that is useful for clinicians to understand how this could benefit them and their patients. This guide is also intended to provide details useful for the C-suite. This could help identify opportunities for implementation. We may need examples of clinical data and its implementation for the various procedures.