|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | Research Matching specifies a method for publishing research process definitions to interested EHR systems to enable matching patients and investigators with appropriate clinical research studies. |
| | |
| __TOC__ | | __TOC__ |
|
| |
|
| ==Summary== | | ==Summary== |
| ''<Describe the profile in about a paragraph using user-oriented language. Focus on what it accomplishes for a user (i.e. the Use Cases). Don't get into how it works, leave that to the Details section.>''
| | <p> |
| | | Research Matching is one of a set of profiles that create interoperability between EHRs and specialized research systems, resulting in EHR-enabled research. Redaction extends the functionality of Clinical Research Process Content and Retrieve Process for Execution. Research Matching focuses on the early steps of research study identification. Processes specified are: |
| ''<Insert a simple graphic that, at a glance, visually summarizes what the profile is about. Do not use an actor/transaction diagram here. Show your graphic to someone for 5 seconds (literally) and ask them what it's about. If what they say hits the main points in your summary paragraph, you have succeeded. E.g. a graphic of a hospital, a clinic, and a lab with patient records moving between them. .>''
| | <ul> |
| | | <li> Finding relevant studies |
| ''<See [[Help:Contents#Tips_.26_Tricks| Help - Tips and Tricks]] for details on inserting an image/graphic.>''
| | <li> Finding personalized studies |
| | <li> Reviewing eligibility criteria |
| | <li> Executing patient searches |
| | <li> Publishing protocols to subscribers |
| | </ul> |
| | </p> |
|
| |
|
| ==Benefits== | | ==Benefits== |
| ''<If the profile can improve Cost, Safety, Quality or Efficiency then list the specific examples of that benefit (e.g. error reduction, increased throughput) and how they come about (e.g. SWF reduces patient errors due to mistyped demographics at the modality by transfering demographics electronically from the Order Filler). Consider using a bullet list for readability. Such benefits help users and vendors make the business case for the profile. If the profile does not improve any aspect of Cost, Safety, Quality or Efficiency feel free to talk about something else here.>''
| | <p> |
| | EHRs and registries contain much of the information that is needed to identify appropriate subjects for clinical studies. Research Matching allows research sponsors to search EHRs, lead to better results and more efficient and cost effective studies. The automated method allows providers or patients to identify studies of interest to them, thereby increasing research participation. The ability for a research system to push a research protocol to an EHR results in a faster and cheaper method for sites to review candidate protocols. |
| | </p> |
|
| |
|
| ==Details== | | ==Details== |
| | <p> |
| | The RPE profile sets up actors which hold sections of the research protocol as executable instruction sets. The Process State Manager hands off the executable instructions to the Process Activity Executor, which abides in the EHR. Research Matching builds on these actors and transactions, and defines the specific processes to be executed. Through the Research Matching processes early study selection, matching, and review are automated. |
| | </p> |
|
| |
|
| ''<A few paragraphs, if appropriate, providing more details (mostly in user-speak, not tech-speak) on what the profile does and how it works.>''
| |
|
| |
| ''<If the user might be familiar with the mechanisms used by the profile, you can mention them here. E.g. Evidence Documents is based on DICOM Structured Report (SR) Templates.>''
| |
|
| |
| ''<If the user might have an appreciation for the problems addressed in the profile, you can mention them here, but keep it short. E.g. Mapping HL7 Order fields to DICOM Modality Worklist attributes can be inconsistent in the marketplace, so Scheduled Workflow provides vendors with more detailed instructions.>''
| |
|
| |
| ==Systems Affected== | | ==Systems Affected== |
| ''<List (in user terms) the types of systems they might expect to have implemented actors from this profile, e.g. RIS, PACS, HIS, CAD Workstation, etc. and for each, how it would participate.>''
| | <ul> |
| | | <li> Electronic Health Record |
| * ''PACS systems may store, manage, and/or display Evidence Documents.''
| | <li> Research Protocol System |
| * ''Display systems may query, retrieve and display Evidence Documents.''
| | </ul> |
| * ''Reporting workstations may retrieve, process and include details from Evidence Documents in reports
| |
| | |
| '''Actors & Transactions:'''
| |
| | |
| ''<Insert an actor-transaction diagram, and or list of Content Definitions>''
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Specification== | | ==Specification== |
|
| |
|
| '''Profile Status:''' [[Comments| Final Text]] | | '''Profile Status:''' [[Comments| Trial Implementation]] |
| ''<Replace "Final Text" with "Trial Implementation" or "Public Comment" as appropriate.>''
| |
|
| |
|
| '''Documents:''' | | '''Documents:''' |
|
| |
|
| ''<Provide direct links to the specific volumes or supplements, and list the volume sections relevant to this profile. This is a simple inventory of official normative and informative text. If you would like to provide a reading guide or walkthrough of what is in each of the different sections for implementers or users, do that in the Profile FAQ or the Profile Implementation Page linked below. If the profile uses transactions from multiple Tech. Frameworks, repeat the structure below.>'' | | ''http://ihe.net/uploadedFiles/Documents/QRPH/IHE_QRPH_Suppl_RM.pdf'' |
| | |
| [http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/index.cfm#radiology IHE Radiology Technical Framework:]
| |
| :* [http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/ihe_tf_rev8.pdf Vol. 1] - Section 5 (SWF Profile)
| |
| :* [http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/ihe_tf_rev8-2.pdf Vol. 2] - Sections 4.8 to 4.10, 4.14 to 4.19, and 4.23
| |
| :* [http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/ihe_tf_rev8-3.pdf Vol. 3] - Appendix E
| |
| | |
| '''Underlying Standards:'''
| |
| | |
| ''<list all the standards on which the profile is based; if possible with links to sources>''
| |
| :* [http://dicom.nema.org DICOM]
| |
| :* [http://www.hl7.org HL7]
| |
| :* ...
| |
| | |
| ==See Also==
| |
| | |
| ''<The following sections can be left out if there is nothing to point to. This is just to show where such information can go.>''
| |
| | |
| | |
| '''Related Profiles'''
| |
| | |
| ''<List profiles this one depends on, profiles that depend on this one, profiles that are synergistic with this one. Start with the name of the other profile as a link and then explain the relationship.>''
| |
| | |
| * ''[[Reporting Workflow]] [RWF] may use Evidence Documents as inputs to the reporting process.''
| |
| * ''[[Simple Image & Numeric Reports]] [SINR] may include data copied from Evidence Documents.''
| |
| * ''[[Cross-enterprise Document Sharing for Imaging]] [XDS-I] can be used to share Evidence Documents between sites over a network.''
| |
| * ''[[Portable Data for Imaging]] [PDI] can store Evidence Documents on media such as CDs.''
| |
| * ''[[Import Reconciliation Workflow]] [IRWF] can fix patient ids, etc. of Evidence Documents when importing.''
| |
| | |
| | |
| '''Consumer Information'''
| |
| | |
| The [[Profile FAQ Template]] answers typical questions about what the Profile does. ''<Replace the link with a link to the actual FAQ page for the Profile>''
| |
| | |
| The [[Profile Purchasing Template]] describes considerations when purchasing equipment to deploy this Profile. ''<Replace the link with a link to the actual Purchasing page for the Profile>''
| |
| | |
| '''Implementer Information'''
| |
| | |
| The [[Profile Implementation Template]] provides additional information about implementing this Profile in software. ''<Replace the link with a link to the actual Implementation page for the Profile>''
| |
| | |
| '''Reference Articles'''
| |
| | |
| ''<List References (good and bad) (with link if possible) to Journal Articles that mention IHE's work (and hopefully include some analysis). Go ahead, Google: IHE <Profile Name> abstract or Google: IHE <Profile Name> and under the "more" select "Scholar". You might be surprised. >''
| |
|
| |
|
| | ''' Supporting Standards: ''' |
|
| |
|
| | <ul> |
| | <li> IHE Retrieve Form for Data-capture |
| | <li> CDISC Protocol Representation |
| | </ul> |
|
| |
|
| This page is based on the [[Profile Overview Template]]
| | [[Category:Profiles]] |
| | [[Category:QRPH Profile]] |
Research Matching specifies a method for publishing research process definitions to interested EHR systems to enable matching patients and investigators with appropriate clinical research studies.
Summary
Research Matching is one of a set of profiles that create interoperability between EHRs and specialized research systems, resulting in EHR-enabled research. Redaction extends the functionality of Clinical Research Process Content and Retrieve Process for Execution. Research Matching focuses on the early steps of research study identification. Processes specified are:
- Finding relevant studies
- Finding personalized studies
- Reviewing eligibility criteria
- Executing patient searches
- Publishing protocols to subscribers
Benefits
EHRs and registries contain much of the information that is needed to identify appropriate subjects for clinical studies. Research Matching allows research sponsors to search EHRs, lead to better results and more efficient and cost effective studies. The automated method allows providers or patients to identify studies of interest to them, thereby increasing research participation. The ability for a research system to push a research protocol to an EHR results in a faster and cheaper method for sites to review candidate protocols.
Details
The RPE profile sets up actors which hold sections of the research protocol as executable instruction sets. The Process State Manager hands off the executable instructions to the Process Activity Executor, which abides in the EHR. Research Matching builds on these actors and transactions, and defines the specific processes to be executed. Through the Research Matching processes early study selection, matching, and review are automated.
Systems Affected
- Electronic Health Record
- Research Protocol System
Specification
Profile Status: Trial Implementation
Documents:
http://ihe.net/uploadedFiles/Documents/QRPH/IHE_QRPH_Suppl_RM.pdf
Supporting Standards:
- IHE Retrieve Form for Data-capture
- CDISC Protocol Representation