PCD TC 2013-02-20 Webex: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Efurst (talk | contribs)
Efurst (talk | contribs)
m Next Meetings: archive
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:


== Proposed Agenda ==  
== Proposed Agenda ==  
'''Placeholder'''


:1. Agenda Approval
:1. Agenda Approval
:2. Review Discussion Summary February 6: [[PCD TC 2013-01-09 Webex]]  
:2. Review Discussion Summary February 6: [[PCD TC 2013-02-06 Webex]]  
 
:3. Approved Proposals
:3.  
::- PC Discussed Increased Recruiting
:4. Detailed Proposals
:4. Status: TF, Supplement, Other Documents
 
:5. Pre-Connectathon/Connectathon/Showcase  
:5.
::- Connectathon and Pre-Connectathon:
:6. Status: TF, Supplement, Other Documents
:::o General issue: how to provide essential test partners?
:Pre-Connectathon/Connectathon/Showcase  
:::o What Did We Learn
:8. Action Item Review  (last reviewed 11/7/12)
:::o What to add to PCD Roadmap; What to add to Testing
:9. Next and Recent Meetings  
:::o Mentors/resources for newcomers
::- TC March __
::- Showcase:
::- Face to Face Monday April 15 thru Thursday April 18 at Westhealth, San Diego
:::o Handouts will go to printer Friday
:10. Additional Business
:::o Intro to the West Health Innovation Demonstration
:6. Next and Recent Meetings  
::- PC and TC See List at Bottom of Page
::- Face to Face week of April 15: Tuesday thru Friday at Westhealth, San Diego
:::o Pump WG Requests Time for WG Meeting
::::. Options include Pump WG meeting Monday before the PC, Friday (with longer days Tu - Th), or setting time for all WGs to have a breakout session or evening meetings.
:::o Web Page: at bottom of this page
:::o Please submit agenda items
:7. Action Item Review  (last reviewed Jan. 9; continue with 132)
::- Item 123 - Close result of Phoenix meetings
:8. Additional Business


== Action Items from Previous Meetings ==
== Action Items from Previous Meetings ==
Line 41: Line 50:


== Participants ==
== Participants ==
'''Placeholder'''


:'''Chair:''' John Garguilo
:'''Chair:''' John Rhoads
: Todd Cooper, Paul Elletson, Al Engelbert, Barrett Franklin, Ken Fuchs, John Garguilo, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, Paul Schluter, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst
: Al Engelbert, Barrett Franklin, John Garguilo, Bob Gold, Richard Lane, Jeff McGeath, Steve Merritt, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, Jeff Rinda, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst


== Discussion ==
== Discussion ==
Line 60: Line 68:
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
: Agenda approved '''Placeholder'''
: Agenda approved
'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''


Line 67: Line 75:
| '''Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair
| '''Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair
| '''Status/Discussion:'''  
| '''Status/Discussion:'''  
: Discussion Summary of previous meeting January 9 was accepted '''Placeholder'''
: Discussion Summary of previous meeting was deferred
:  
:  


Line 79: Line 87:
| '''Agenda Items''' <br>- As Noted
| '''Agenda Items''' <br>- As Noted
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
3.


3. Approved Proposals:
:- The PC referred recruiting of members to participate in developing these efforts. John Rhoads encouraged members to volunteer.


4.  
4. Status: TF, Supplement, Other:
:- John Rhoads noted that the WP deadline is approaching.
:- John Garguilo will develop CPs resulting from the Connectathon process. He encouraged review of supplements that may be included in the TF. He recommended setting a portion of the F2F aside for discussion of the CPs. He noted that CPs should be available early in the cycles. John Rhoads offered to help, noting that we should avoid the late addition of CPs. He suggested that CPs be offered to clarify/improve as well as correct the documents.
:- Manny noted that the TC recommended devoting Tuesday PCD Connectathon/Showcase WG meetings to the review of tests.


5.  
5. Pre-Connectathon/Connectathon/Showcase:
:- Showcase:


6.  
:- Connectathon Lessons Learned
::o John Rhoads noted that his message regarding the lack of partners has been recognized by Connectathon leadership.
::o Richard Lane recommended that last minute changes to the NIST tool should be avoided. Release notes and status of changes would be helpful. John Garguilo responded that this will be addressed.
::o Richard Lane recommended that reporting be automated; cutting and pasting into Gazelle and the NIST tool was time consuming and potentially error prone. He noted that this would also contribute to the certification process. John Rhoads suggested that PCD discuss the technical issues in depth and prepare a recommendation for the Connectathon leadership. Monroe added that not all messages will be HL7 (e.g., WTCP and IEEE) so the solution should take this into account. Richard and Darryl will lead this effort.
::o John Garguilo noted that the PCD Testing WG is a useful forum for this effort.


7.  
6. Meetings:
 
F2F:
8. Action Item Review:  
::o Members were encouraged to suggest agenda topics on the meeting Wiki page.
::o Scheduling PIV WG meeting during the F2F period. Multiple options were considered including scheduling these during the TC meetings, or separated for Friday or Monday or in the evenings. John Rhoads asked if there were other WGs that would like to have a meeting. Conclusion: Pump WG meeting Monday afternoon and additional pump discussion for all participants later in the week.
::o Hotel: Manny indicated that the hotels that are close are expensive. He requested that participants let him know when they will come and he will seek less expensive, group rate elsewhere. Car pooling will be addressed later.


7. Action Items:
:- Deferred.




Line 108: Line 129:
''The next meetings are:  
''The next meetings are:  


''TC March __, 2013 [[PCD TC 2013-03-__ Webex]] ''
''TC March 13, 2013 [[PCD TC 2013-03-13 Webex]] ''
 
''TC March 27, 2013 [[PCD TC 2013-03-27 Webex]] ''
 
''TC April 10, 2013 [[PCD TC 2013-04-10 Webex]] ''
 
''PC March 20, 2013 [[PCD PC 2013-03-20 Webex]] ''
 
''PC April 3, 2013 [[PCD PC 2013-04-03 Webex]] ''


''PC February 13, 2013 [[PCD PC 2013-02-13 Webex]] ''
''PC&TC Face to Face April 16-19, 2013 [[PCD PC&TC 2013 April 16 to 19 F2F]] ''


''TC __, 2013 [[PCD TC 2013-__-__ Webex]] ''
''Joint PC&TC April 24, 2013 [[PCD PC&TC 2013-04-24 Webex]] ''


[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Category:PCD Meeting]]
[[Category: PCD Meeting Archive 2013]]

Latest revision as of 18:01, 22 November 2013

Patient Care Device Domain

Meeting Purpose

TC Regularly Scheduled Meeting

WebEx Information

Topic: PCD Technical Committee

Regularly Scheduled Meeting Time

Time: 11:00 am, Eastern Time (New York)

Duration: 60 Minutes

Proposed Agenda

1. Agenda Approval
2. Review Discussion Summary February 6: PCD TC 2013-02-06 Webex
3. Approved Proposals
- PC Discussed Increased Recruiting
4. Status: TF, Supplement, Other Documents
5. Pre-Connectathon/Connectathon/Showcase
- Connectathon and Pre-Connectathon:
o General issue: how to provide essential test partners?
o What Did We Learn
o What to add to PCD Roadmap; What to add to Testing
o Mentors/resources for newcomers
- Showcase:
o Handouts will go to printer Friday
o Intro to the West Health Innovation Demonstration
6. Next and Recent Meetings
- PC and TC See List at Bottom of Page
- Face to Face week of April 15: Tuesday thru Friday at Westhealth, San Diego
o Pump WG Requests Time for WG Meeting
. Options include Pump WG meeting Monday before the PC, Friday (with longer days Tu - Th), or setting time for all WGs to have a breakout session or evening meetings.
o Web Page: at bottom of this page
o Please submit agenda items
7. Action Item Review (last reviewed Jan. 9; continue with 132)
- Item 123 - Close result of Phoenix meetings
8. Additional Business

Action Items from Previous Meetings

See PCD Technical Committee Action Items.

Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.

References

Placeholder

Participants

Chair: John Rhoads
Al Engelbert, Barrett Franklin, John Garguilo, Bob Gold, Richard Lane, Jeff McGeath, Steve Merritt, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, Jeff Rinda, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst

Discussion

Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Agenda approved

Action(s):

2 Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
Discussion Summary of previous meeting was deferred

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 Agenda Items
- As Noted
Status/Discussion:

3. Approved Proposals:

- The PC referred recruiting of members to participate in developing these efforts. John Rhoads encouraged members to volunteer.

4. Status: TF, Supplement, Other:

- John Rhoads noted that the WP deadline is approaching.
- John Garguilo will develop CPs resulting from the Connectathon process. He encouraged review of supplements that may be included in the TF. He recommended setting a portion of the F2F aside for discussion of the CPs. He noted that CPs should be available early in the cycles. John Rhoads offered to help, noting that we should avoid the late addition of CPs. He suggested that CPs be offered to clarify/improve as well as correct the documents.
- Manny noted that the TC recommended devoting Tuesday PCD Connectathon/Showcase WG meetings to the review of tests.

5. Pre-Connectathon/Connectathon/Showcase:

- Showcase:
- Connectathon Lessons Learned
o John Rhoads noted that his message regarding the lack of partners has been recognized by Connectathon leadership.
o Richard Lane recommended that last minute changes to the NIST tool should be avoided. Release notes and status of changes would be helpful. John Garguilo responded that this will be addressed.
o Richard Lane recommended that reporting be automated; cutting and pasting into Gazelle and the NIST tool was time consuming and potentially error prone. He noted that this would also contribute to the certification process. John Rhoads suggested that PCD discuss the technical issues in depth and prepare a recommendation for the Connectathon leadership. Monroe added that not all messages will be HL7 (e.g., WTCP and IEEE) so the solution should take this into account. Richard and Darryl will lead this effort.
o John Garguilo noted that the PCD Testing WG is a useful forum for this effort.

6. Meetings: F2F:

o Members were encouraged to suggest agenda topics on the meeting Wiki page.
o Scheduling PIV WG meeting during the F2F period. Multiple options were considered including scheduling these during the TC meetings, or separated for Friday or Monday or in the evenings. John Rhoads asked if there were other WGs that would like to have a meeting. Conclusion: Pump WG meeting Monday afternoon and additional pump discussion for all participants later in the week.
o Hotel: Manny indicated that the hotels that are close are expensive. He requested that participants let him know when they will come and he will seek less expensive, group rate elsewhere. Car pooling will be addressed later.

7. Action Items:

- Deferred.


8. Next and Recent Meetings:


Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):


Next Meetings

The next meetings are:

TC March 13, 2013 PCD TC 2013-03-13 Webex

TC March 27, 2013 PCD TC 2013-03-27 Webex

TC April 10, 2013 PCD TC 2013-04-10 Webex

PC March 20, 2013 PCD PC 2013-03-20 Webex

PC April 3, 2013 PCD PC 2013-04-03 Webex

PC&TC Face to Face April 16-19, 2013 PCD PC&TC 2013 April 16 to 19 F2F

Joint PC&TC April 24, 2013 PCD PC&TC 2013-04-24 Webex

PCD Home