PCD Connectathon&Showcase 2010-12-21 Webex: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Efurst (talk | contribs)
editor
8,826 edits
m ESTABLISH PAGE
 
Efurst (talk | contribs)
editor
8,826 edits
m remove "placeholder"
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
PCD Connectathon & Showcase Meeting, December 21, 2010
PCD Connectathon & Showcase Meeting, December 21, 2010
'''PLACEHOLDER'''


== Action Items ==  
== Action Items ==  
Line 10: Line 8:
== Agenda ==  
== Agenda ==  
'''Connectathon Portion of the Agenda'''
'''Connectathon Portion of the Agenda'''
: Consistent identification of tests, patients between Excel descriptions and NIST test tool.
: Multiple items due to Steve: attendance/registration of people, network, etc.
 
: Tests not posted to Gazelle this week will be considered as passed if time doesn't permit review.


'''Showcase Portion of the Agenda'''
'''Showcase Portion of the Agenda'''


* PCD Wall Segment
* Refer to Excel "to do 20101219" list at ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Showcases/HIMSS2011Feb/ComprehensiveInformationAndIndex/ which was distributed in advance.
: If the backside of the right end of the DEC wall, we will have 36-38 linear feet – and a challenge to make the best use of this space. This wall will include PCD MU.
: Submit Dec. 24 due items before celebrating.
::- Among the options are to develop posters that address progress and address the significance of PCD profiles and IHE interoperability, history and progress.  
:::o Temporal Approach (past (available), present (work in process), future) or Profile Approach (one or two posters for each profile with the significant accomplishments,availability and plans).
:::o Volunteers for poster development.
::- NIST test tools and other PCD relevant actitivities.


* General
* General, remaining
: In general, it appears that we have reasonable representation of the three profiles on all three walls (and stories). A few issues are apparent:
: In general, it appears that we have reasonable representation of the three profiles on all three walls (and stories). A few issues are apparent:
::- Where and how to include the SPD (filter) option – is time available in the logical place (DEC/mother/baby) and/or elsewhere?
::- Where and how to include the SPD (filter) option – is time available in the logical place (DEC/mother/baby) and/or elsewhere?
::- Where and how to reference work in progress, notably WCM (and the same can be said for events, MEM and other efforts)? Posters? Part of the handout? Included in the script?
::- Where and how to reference work in progress, notably WCM (and the same can be said for events, MEM and other efforts)? Posters? Part of the handout? Included in the script?
::- What is an appropriate clinical story that provides the framework for discussion of the profiles on each wall?
::- Should the ventilator (if a second vent is available) be on the ACM or PIV wall? The PIV wall has fewer steps.
::- How do we work Meaningful Use into the three profile focused walls?
::- What will the Meaningful Use wall require in the number and type of devices?
::- What will the Meaningful Use wall require in the number and type of devices?
::- Is Cerner appropriately represented (they are asked to provide IOP on two walls, may be able to show other capabilities)?
::- Are all vendors who are asked to provide multiple systems able to do so? With the need to speak to three, if not four profiles, we need to populate the other walls, and this will require at least one, if not two or three additional devices. Also, with so many devices on the DEC wall, and limited time to provide visibility to each type, I would like to see many represented on a second wall.
::- Are all vendors who are asked to provide multiple systems able to do so? With the need to speak to three, if not four profiles, we need to populate the other walls, and this will require at least one, if not two or three additional devices. Also, with so many devices on the DEC wall, and limited time to provide visibility to each type, I would like to see many represented on a second wall.
::- Are the three EMRs and SIS’ periop system capable of displaying representative data from the various systems (DOR at least)?
::- Are the three EMRs and SIS’ periop system capable of displaying representative data from the various systems (DOR at least)?
::- What should be in the handout (last year’s is at ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Showcases/HIMSS2010March/Handouts/)?  
::- What should be in the handout (last year’s is at ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Showcases/HIMSS2010March/Handouts/)?  


* Potential Clinical Stories
* Posters
::- For your consideration only: ACM a heart patient (e.g., congestive heart disease), PIV a transplant patient (lots of drugs). Your thoughts?
::- We will make use of posters to provide visitors with more detail and fill in gaps, and to provide vendors with a way to address questions. Last year’s posters are at ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Showcases/HIMSS2010March/PCD_Posters_2010/. This year posters were listed in an earlier email.
: We need volunteers.


* Posters
* Docents
::- We will make use of posters to provide visitors with more detail and fill in gaps, and to provide vendors with a way to address questions. Last year’s posters are at ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Showcases/HIMSS2010March/PCD_Posters_2010/.  This year we will need at least the following posters:
: Volunteers
:For the MU wall:
::- Meaningful Use (at least some of last year’s posters are on the ftp site identified with Wall 4). Some devices will be needed, TBD.
::- Work in progress?
::- NIST test tooling?
::- IDCO profile?


: For the specific walls:
'''AAMI Mini-Showcase'''
::- ACM: WCM, Events
Will be addressed later.
::- DEC: Tie PCD Hospital Messaging, EMR data with external systems: OB office on the entrance side, Public Health (hearing report) and Baby’s medical data to a Pediatrician on the departure side.
::- PIV: ?
::- For the three, do we add a MU poster?


== Participants ==
== Participants ==
'''Placeholder'''
 
Terry Bettis, Robert Britton, Eric Chetwynd, Scott Eaton, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, Ken Fuchs, Sarah Hopkins, Roger Kittelson, Nitin Kunte, Khalil Maalouf, Geri Mitchell-Brown, Monroe Pattillo, Huili Wang, Scott Zaffrin, Manny Furst
Terry Bettis, Robert Britton, Eric Chetwynd, Bikram Day, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, John Garguilo, Chad Hays, Sarah Hopkins, Roger Kittelson, Nitin Kunte, Geri Mitchell-Brown, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, Paul Schluter, Huili Wang, Tommy Wheeler, Rob Wilder, Scott Zaffrin, Manny Furst


== Discussion ==
== Discussion ==
Line 93: Line 76:
| '''Status/Discussion:'''   
| '''Status/Discussion:'''   
* Pre-Connectathon and Connectathon Tests  
* Pre-Connectathon and Connectathon Tests  
:  
:- Manny indicated that he will accept test results all week, and next week and will try to review them. In the absence of review participants who are confident in their success should assume they met requirements.
:- Connectathon testing: No significant issues were raised.
:- Connectathon logistics: Deadlines tomorrow: Steve Moore’s emails registrations, ip addresses (Google Groups). Steve notified everyone to bring Ethernet cables, recommended power strips. Manny added cables, etc. including spares of all that can be brought. Access points were discussed. Geri has Matt's approval for her AP, Al will bring one but not use it unless necessary. Manny indicated that PCD participants should plan on a meeting with Matt during the Connectathon.


'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
Line 101: Line 86:
|-
|-
| align="center" | 4
| align="center" | 4
| '''Showcase Scenarios''' <br>- Manny
| '''Showcase''' <br>- Manny
| '''Status/Discussion:'''   
| '''Status/Discussion:'''   
* General
* General
:  
:- Discussion centered around items listed on the To Do list that was provided by email to the group in advance. Manny asked for the data required to enable specification of electrical and network support within and outside the structure. This includes definition of the clinical story, sequence of clinical sites, and to the extent possible, identification of devices and systems required. Manny will update the documents and drawings of the structure and deliver that to Elli around Jan. 1.
 
* Posters
 


'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
Line 116: Line 98:
|-
|-
| align="center" | 5
| align="center" | 5
| '''yyy''' <br>-  
| '''AAMI Mini-Showcase''' <br>-  


| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:*  
:* Deferred


'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''

Latest revision as of 23:34, 21 December 2010

PCD Connectathon & Showcase Meeting, December 21, 2010

Action Items

You can find the Action Items at http:___

Agenda

Connectathon Portion of the Agenda

Multiple items due to Steve: attendance/registration of people, network, etc.
Tests not posted to Gazelle this week will be considered as passed if time doesn't permit review.

Showcase Portion of the Agenda

Submit Dec. 24 due items before celebrating.
  • General, remaining
In general, it appears that we have reasonable representation of the three profiles on all three walls (and stories). A few issues are apparent:
- Where and how to include the SPD (filter) option – is time available in the logical place (DEC/mother/baby) and/or elsewhere?
- Where and how to reference work in progress, notably WCM (and the same can be said for events, MEM and other efforts)? Posters? Part of the handout? Included in the script?
- What will the Meaningful Use wall require in the number and type of devices?
- Are all vendors who are asked to provide multiple systems able to do so? With the need to speak to three, if not four profiles, we need to populate the other walls, and this will require at least one, if not two or three additional devices. Also, with so many devices on the DEC wall, and limited time to provide visibility to each type, I would like to see many represented on a second wall.
- Are the three EMRs and SIS’ periop system capable of displaying representative data from the various systems (DOR at least)?
- What should be in the handout (last year’s is at ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Showcases/HIMSS2010March/Handouts/)?
  • Posters
- We will make use of posters to provide visitors with more detail and fill in gaps, and to provide vendors with a way to address questions. Last year’s posters are at ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Showcases/HIMSS2010March/PCD_Posters_2010/. This year posters were listed in an earlier email.
We need volunteers.
  • Docents
Volunteers

AAMI Mini-Showcase Will be addressed later.

Participants

Terry Bettis, Robert Britton, Eric Chetwynd, Bikram Day, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, John Garguilo, Chad Hays, Sarah Hopkins, Roger Kittelson, Nitin Kunte, Geri Mitchell-Brown, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, Paul Schluter, Huili Wang, Tommy Wheeler, Rob Wilder, Scott Zaffrin, Manny Furst

Discussion

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Manny 		Status/Discussion:
No changes were made to the agenda

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):


2 Previous Meeting Summary
- Manny 		Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Accepted

Action(s):


3 Testing
- 		Status/Discussion:
  • Pre-Connectathon and Connectathon Tests
- Manny indicated that he will accept test results all week, and next week and will try to review them. In the absence of review participants who are confident in their success should assume they met requirements.
- Connectathon testing: No significant issues were raised.
- Connectathon logistics: Deadlines tomorrow: Steve Moore’s emails registrations, ip addresses (Google Groups). Steve notified everyone to bring Ethernet cables, recommended power strips. Manny added cables, etc. including spares of all that can be brought. Access points were discussed. Geri has Matt's approval for her AP, Al will bring one but not use it unless necessary. Manny indicated that PCD participants should plan on a meeting with Matt during the Connectathon.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

4 Showcase
- Manny 		Status/Discussion:
  • General
- Discussion centered around items listed on the To Do list that was provided by email to the group in advance. Manny asked for the data required to enable specification of electrical and network support within and outside the structure. This includes definition of the clinical story, sequence of clinical sites, and to the extent possible, identification of devices and systems required. Manny will update the documents and drawings of the structure and deliver that to Elli around Jan. 1.

Decisions/Issues:


Action(s):

5 AAMI Mini-Showcase
- 		Status/Discussion:
  • Deferred

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):


Return to main WG page which has links to individual meeting pages

Return to main PCD Connectathon/Showcase WG page: PCD_Connectathon&Showcase_WG_2010-11

Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_Connectathon%26Showcase_2010-12-21_Webex&oldid=47182"