Card Tech Minutes 2010.03.04: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New page: ==Attendees== ==Minutes== Topic of this call was a joint discussion with the IHE Radiology Technical Committee Based on the Actor Transaction diagram the basic concept was introduced: ...
 
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Attendees==
==Attendees==
* Antje Schroeder (Siemens)
* Tom Dolan (Philips)
* Nick Gawrit (Heartbase)
* Bijoy Sundersingh (Philips)
* Keith Klassy (AMICAS)
* Paul Seifert (Agfa)
* Rich Fronek (Cardiac Science)
* Harry Solomon (GE)
 
==Minutes==
==Minutes==
* '''AGENDA'''
** update on IEO profile
** update on other profiles
** confirm dates for April F2F


Topic of this call was a joint discussion with the IHE Radiology Technical Committee
* '''Image Enabled Office'''
 
** Harry presented the latest version of the document and updated the wider tech team on the progress made in the profile editors meeting yesterday:
Based on the Actor Transaction diagram the basic concept was introduced:  
***  see [ftp://iheyr2:interop@ftp.ihe.net/Cardio/Year5-2009-2010/Technical_Committee/Supplements/IEO/] for latest document.
Basic concepts of Echo/Cath workflow with simplified ordering.  
*** Practice management actor:
No ADT and order placer, but basic functionality is taken over by the Practice Manager / EMR actor, grouped with a DSS/OF and Display actor
**** We have to strike a balance between:
Image Manager grouped with PPS manager
***** defining a new actor in IHE only when necessary (to keep things simple, to reuse existing conceptual/implementation work AMAP, reduce follow-on admin impact on updating technical framework transaction definitions)
Acquisition Modality / Image Display / Evidence creator as in Echo/Cath.  
**** and
Report creator to submit reports to EMR system
***** relating abstract IHE actors to terminology/sytems clinicians understand.
Discussion surrounding card specific transactions vs Radiology transactions:
**** We believe that the Practice management "actor" should be removed as a formal actor, and that the actors grouped together to provide the workflow support recommended should have a collective label based e.g. on HL7 EHR functionality reference model or another term meaningful to user so they see the connection between the logical systems in place today.
Somehow content profiles for the different medical specialties need to be represented. In this context, Kevin O Donell is planning some refactoring of some of the existing transactions in order to better support domain specific content profiles. An example is to take specific display functionality out of the retrieve image transaction.  
**** We may do this with a combination of diagramming and explanatory text in an appendix to link the "real" customer world to the IHE terms used in the technical framework.
This is partially a marketing question as how to market and define in integration statements
*** Level of detail in profile Transaction Table:
Communication with systems/actors outside the office:  
**** The added detail in the 4th col. of Table 1.1 is not per current IHE format conventions.
XDS-I as is addresses this topic and therefore is not in the scope of this profile
**** The '''decision''' is that we leave it this way for now for clarity into the public comment phase - with the aim to remove it after PC to align with documentation conventions
Some mechanism for handling standing worklist as offen happening for ECG is needed. In this context a PDQ query is needed.  
*** Value type in OBX segment with URL Reference:
Discussion regarding the image generating image enabled office or the image receiving image enabled office:  
**** The value type in SEQ 2 of the table will be changed to HD which alignes it with a similar transaction in the DRPT profile and allows a UID to be transferred.
The scope of this profile is the image generating image enabled office.  
** '''ACTION ITEM''': Harry will update document and post to ftp site (see reference above for latest)
The question is whether Import Reconcilliation workflow is sufficient to address the Image Receiving part.  
* '''Status Updates on Other Profiles''':
** Cardiology Report Content
*** Detailled discussion next time
*** '''ACTION ITEM:''' Harry to upload document with mapping of Cardiology terminology to SNOMED to wiki page
** ECG workflow
*** No update this meeting
** EP Implant workflow
*** No representative of sub group was present
** 3D/4D Echo Whitepaper
*** No update this meeting
* '''Dates for April F2F''':
** We have 3 active profiles to complete and based on the current status of these, the limited opportunities for detailled debate ( e.g. cardiology Report content is still pending) It was felt by the majority of people on the call that we will need to extend the april pre-PC F2F to three (3) days
** We request that ACC plan to accommodate us from '''Monday April 12th to Wednesday April 14th in Heart house'''.
** '''ACTION ITEM  -  DONE''': Dan confirms in email to IHE-TC list by '''Friday THIS WEEK''' ( Mar. 5) 3 day F2F can be accommodated by ACC.




#The next Technical Committee call is scheduled for Thursday, 2/16/10, at 10 AM ET.
=== Next Steps ===
#The next Technical Committee call is scheduled for Thursday, 3/18/10, at 10 AM ET.

Latest revision as of 11:27, 9 March 2010

Attendees

  • Antje Schroeder (Siemens)
  • Tom Dolan (Philips)
  • Nick Gawrit (Heartbase)
  • Bijoy Sundersingh (Philips)
  • Keith Klassy (AMICAS)
  • Paul Seifert (Agfa)
  • Rich Fronek (Cardiac Science)
  • Harry Solomon (GE)

Minutes

  • AGENDA
    • update on IEO profile
    • update on other profiles
    • confirm dates for April F2F
  • Image Enabled Office
    • Harry presented the latest version of the document and updated the wider tech team on the progress made in the profile editors meeting yesterday:
      • see [1] for latest document.
      • Practice management actor:
        • We have to strike a balance between:
          • defining a new actor in IHE only when necessary (to keep things simple, to reuse existing conceptual/implementation work AMAP, reduce follow-on admin impact on updating technical framework transaction definitions)
        • and
          • relating abstract IHE actors to terminology/sytems clinicians understand.
        • We believe that the Practice management "actor" should be removed as a formal actor, and that the actors grouped together to provide the workflow support recommended should have a collective label based e.g. on HL7 EHR functionality reference model or another term meaningful to user so they see the connection between the logical systems in place today.
        • We may do this with a combination of diagramming and explanatory text in an appendix to link the "real" customer world to the IHE terms used in the technical framework.
      • Level of detail in profile Transaction Table:
        • The added detail in the 4th col. of Table 1.1 is not per current IHE format conventions.
        • The decision is that we leave it this way for now for clarity into the public comment phase - with the aim to remove it after PC to align with documentation conventions
      • Value type in OBX segment with URL Reference:
        • The value type in SEQ 2 of the table will be changed to HD which alignes it with a similar transaction in the DRPT profile and allows a UID to be transferred.
    • ACTION ITEM: Harry will update document and post to ftp site (see reference above for latest)
  • Status Updates on Other Profiles:
    • Cardiology Report Content
      • Detailled discussion next time
      • ACTION ITEM: Harry to upload document with mapping of Cardiology terminology to SNOMED to wiki page
    • ECG workflow
      • No update this meeting
    • EP Implant workflow
      • No representative of sub group was present
    • 3D/4D Echo Whitepaper
      • No update this meeting
  • Dates for April F2F:
    • We have 3 active profiles to complete and based on the current status of these, the limited opportunities for detailled debate ( e.g. cardiology Report content is still pending) It was felt by the majority of people on the call that we will need to extend the april pre-PC F2F to three (3) days
    • We request that ACC plan to accommodate us from Monday April 12th to Wednesday April 14th in Heart house.
    • ACTION ITEM - DONE: Dan confirms in email to IHE-TC list by Friday THIS WEEK ( Mar. 5) 3 day F2F can be accommodated by ACC.


Next Steps

  1. The next Technical Committee call is scheduled for Thursday, 3/18/10, at 10 AM ET.
Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Card_Tech_Minutes_2010.03.04&oldid=40785"