PCD PC 2009-08-05 Webex: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Efurst (talk | contribs)
m Establish Page
 
Smaxwell (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
== Proposed Agenda ==  
== Proposed Agenda ==  


'''updated with selected information from July 8 as a placeholder - NEED TO UPDATE'''
'''updated with selected information from July 22 as a placeholder'''


'''Please Add Your Suggestions'''
'''Please Add Your Suggestions'''


:* Review of Discussion Summaries [[PCD PC 2009-07-08 Webex]]  
:* Review of Discussion Summaries [[PCD PC 2009-07-22 Webex]]
:* [[PCD_Schedule | PCD Schedule review]]
:* TC Votes out for ballot
::* PIV/DEC Changes Proposals
::* IDCO move to TI
::* WAN alignment
:* Continua MoU extension
:* ICE/PIC Meeting
:* PCD report to IHE Board
:* Webinar (7-30-2009 link not yet posted)
:* Product validation and verification - [[Patient_Care_Device | PCD mission]]
:* Update on White Papers and Supplements:
:* Update on White Papers and Supplements:
::* ACM Open Issues / Extensions
::* ACM  
::* DPI  
::* DPI  
::* Medical Equipment Management
::* Medical Equipment Management
::* PIV/Infusion Pump Open Issues / Extensions
::* PIV/Infusion Pump  
::* RTM Open Issues / Extensions
::* RTM  
::* IDCO
::* IDCO
::* WCM
::* WCM
::* Medical Device Semantic Architecture
::* Regulatory Considerations
:* Continua
:* Connectathon/Showcase kick-off July 30th
:* Connectathon/Showcase kick-off July 30th
::* PCD Showcase Planning with HIMSS to begin shortly
::* PCD Showcase Planning with HIMSS to begin shortly
:* ARRA/Meaningful Use
:* Review Action Items
:* Review Action Items
:* New Business
:* New Business
Line 39: Line 45:
== Discussion Summary and Action Items from Previous Meetings ==
== Discussion Summary and Action Items from Previous Meetings ==


'''Updated With meeting of July 8''' [[PCD PC 2009-07-08 Webex]] -- NEED TO UPDATE'''
'''Updated With meeting of July 22''' [[PCD PC 2009-07-22 Webex]]'''
Decision meetings will have minutes that require approval. This may be accomplished by email ballot.
 
:{|border="2"
|-
! width="5%"  align="center" |No.
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Action Item
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Owner
! width="5%  align="left"  |Participants
! width="10%  align="left"  |Due
! width="5%  align="left"  |Open/Closed
!              align="left"  |Description/Update
|-
| align="center" | 41
| Monitor FDA actions on Universal Device ID
| Jeff Secunda
| --
| July 8, 2009
| Open
| '''Ken reported that there is activity on this topic, but nothing concrete to report. He saw the headline to an article that claimed that the initial focus will be on Class III devices.'''


|-
See [[PCD Planning Committee Action Items]] page.
| align="center" | 71
| Recruit clinicians; develop novel ways, attend to their priorities and schedules
| Ken, Manny
| --
| Open
| Open
| Profile development may be a reasonable initial focus for involvement and perhaps lead to further involvement in PCD. Paul had suggested a booth at at ACC, other meetings. Liase with standards groups such as ASTM, professional societies. Manny spoke with Cristal Anderson, HIMSS. Steve is talking with the Mass Health Data Consortium.  


|-
Decision meetings will have minutes that require approval. This may be accomplished by email ballot.
| align="center" | 72
| Press releases as recruiting tool, including the Showcase.
| Manny
| --
| Open
| Open
| Following the F2F – good timing for a press release.
 
|-
| align="center" | 74
| Mapping PCD into v3 CDA with relevance to RTM
| Todd
| Peter Hendler
| July 8, 2009
| Open
| Todd: VA was planning to move forward about use of CDA. He will talk with James McCain. Peter: Kaiser and VA working to trade documents as part of NHIN project.
: Goal is to assure the appropriate set of medical device semantic components is included in the appropriate location in CDA/CCD documents and HL7 v3 nessages.
: Todd will ask the VA as to whether there is still any interest in this project.
: Todd will schedule a webex the end of August/early September to discuss the status of the profile proposal and identify what needs to happen to move it forward in this next cycle.
: Will be addressed in Vancouver meeting the week of September 15.
: The HITSP CMDC/CDC Use Case includes a document communication profile. HL7 Technical Steering Committee, HITSP management, VA and Kaiser are considering how to move this forward. The technical requirements are clear, but there’s a lack of a sufficient number of volunteers to do the work. Will likely come up next week at HITSP meetings.
: PCD and HL7 will meet at HIMSS. HITSP is pushing for more robust document communications. Change date to April 15.
 
|-
| align="center" | 78
| 2009 Survey Development
| Ray Zambuto
| Manny
| July 8, 2009
| Open
| See earlier meetings for history. Ray to release updated survey to HIMSS Analytics.
 
|-
| align="center" | 82
| Users Guide
| Steve Merritt
| --
| July 8, 2009
| Open
| '''Steve indicated a Wiki page is available and will set up a WebEx to review in mid-July.'''
 
|-
| align="center" | 86
| Contribute to, or develop a glossary.
| Steve
| --
| August 5, 2009
| Open
| Ray will contact Patrick Bernat to arrange collaboration. Ray’s discussion with Patrick at AAMI revealed that Yadin is working on a glossary for a related area, but the CE-IT group has nothing on the agenda. PCD will take the lead. Steve Merritt will fold this into the User Handbook. DPI will include a specialized glossary and coordinate with Steve. This work should lead to a harmonized glossary. Steve will take responsibility. '''Ken will ask Ray about this one.'''
 
|-
| align="center" | 90
| '''<Action Item>''' | Monitor HITSP’s Work (also on TC list)
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Jan Wittenber
| '''<Participants>''' | Maria, Lisa Carnahan
| '''<Due Date>'''  | July 8, 2009
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Jan is on the relevant tiger team. Jan and several PCD members will participate in developing the response. Maria will generate the materials, Jan will get it to HITSP, Lisa will contact HITSP and USHIK (within AHRQ). Anticipate this will pick up in mid-July including some PCD related items. Jan submitted some RTM items in the Tiger Team required format and showed that the semantic requirements differed from the original concepts. Definition of Meaningful Use has been published and does pertain to device connectitivity (target 2015]. [06/24/09]Co-chairs will be sending a letter asking that this be accelerated given the existing work that is already available. '''Meaningful Use: Todd sent note recommending device interoperability be moved up from 2015 to 2010. '''
 
|-
| align="center" | 91
| '''<Action Item>''' | Develop New Brief Profile Proposals for Cycle 5
| '''<Owner>:'''  |
| '''<Participants>''' |
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.08.05
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | For MEM: Battery management (leverage existing PCD-01), Location boundary alarms, Nomenclature requirements (Data types, names, value sets), Examine status of location services within HL7 '''Manny to look at setting up a Wiki page and confer with Todd. Paul suggested including device related terms (status, etc.) and location information. '''
 
|-
| align="center" | 92
| '''<Action Item>''' | Vendor Recruiting for Cycle 5
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Manny
| '''<Participants>''' | Barbara, Monroe, Steve Merritt
| '''<Due Date>'''  | July 8, 2009
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Manny offered to make initial contacts with potential participating companies and asked Barbara to provide a list of what users want. Manny will contact companies identified by ECRI Institute and Monroe, and include a list of user needs and priorities for ACM. Press releases represent another tool. Manny to remind participants that PCD should provide press releases. He will draft a release. Barriers to vendor participation were identified. Steve will develop the “Getting Started” Wiki page. The PCD webinar being prepared(HIMSS09 Showcase presentation) may be useful. '''Manny will make phone calls and requested contact information for potential participants. Also see #91 '''
 
|-
| align="center" | 93
| '''<Action Item>''' | Certification of Systems Claiming Conformance
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Elliot
| '''<Participants>''' | Ioana
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.05.04
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Elliot and Ioana will approach John Halamka, Steve Lieber and NIST regarding certification for PCD. Greg will follow up with Iaona this afternoon. Todd emphasized the importance of quick action to assure that PCD is on their radar. '''Todd will talk to Elliot and Iaona about progress.'''
 
|-
| align="center" | 94
| '''<Action Item>''' |
| '''<Owner>:'''  |
| '''<Participants>''' |
| '''<Due Date>'''  |
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
 
 
 
 
 
|}
:


== Participants ==
== Participants ==
'''Placeholder'''
:'''Chair:''' Steve Merritt
:'''Chair:''' Steve Merritt
 
:* Jon Blasingame, Rita Brahmbhatt, Randy Carroll, Anupriyo Chakravarti, Todd Cooper, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, Colin FX Gartska, Christoff Gessner, Rich Hillman, Sarah Hopkins, Steven Large, Brad Lunde, Sandra Martinez, Steve Merritt, Gary Meyer, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, Jeff Rinda, Paul Schluter, Ioana Singureanu, Greg Staudenmaier, John Zaleski, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst
:* Jon Blasingame, Anupriyo Chakravarti, Micha Coleman, Todd Cooper, Bikram Day, Walter Dobbins, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, Ken Fuchs, John Garguilo, Jianguo Jiang, Steve Merritt, Gary Meyer, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, Paul Schluter, Tom Schultz, Nick Steblay, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst


== Discussion ==
== Discussion ==
Line 196: Line 73:
| '''Discussion Summary''' <br>- Chair
| '''Discussion Summary''' <br>- Chair
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:* Accepted as posted  '''placeholder'''
:* Summary of last meeting was accepted as posted   


'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''
Line 204: Line 81:
| '''Action Items Review''' <br>- Chair
| '''Action Items Review''' <br>- Chair
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
Action Items were deferred
:* 41: Monitor FDA actions on Universal Device ID -  
:* 41: Monitor FDA actions on Universal Device ID -  
:* 71: Recruit clinicians -  
:* 71: Recruit clinicians -  
Line 224: Line 103:
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:* Updates
:* Updates
:: TF/DEC -  
:: Manny suggested that all profiles indicate that RTM is required with explanation of how to handle existing and future (not yet included) coding.
:: ACM -  
:: TF/DEC - No change.
:: DPI –  
:: ACM - Monroe indicated that the TI update will be discussed tomorrow. Ken noted that there may be waveform snippets accompanying alarm messages and this is also being addressed. It differs from regularly scheduled waveform communication.
:: IDCO -  
:: DPI – Meets tomorrow. Goal is WP for distribution at the end of the month.
:: MEM -  
:: IDCO - IDCO release as TI is out for ballot. The WG is working on IEEE nomenclature.
:: PIV/Infusion Pump -  
:: MEM - The WP will be presented at next week’s TC and then will go to ballot for release as public comment.
:: RTM -  
:: PIV/Infusion Pump - Pump CPs were approved for release for ballot in the TC meeting earlier today. TI version 2 will follow the ballot.
:: RTM - CPs will be discussed in the WG then provided to the TC for release for ballot next week.
:: WCM - Meets today. There’s an issue of whether this is a separate profile or is integrated into DEC. If in DEC there’s a question of how to provide visibility to purchasers. This is similar to the RTM issue.
 
 
:: Semantic Architecture –  
:: Semantic Architecture –  
:: Regulatory Considerations -  
:: Regulatory Considerations -  
Line 248: Line 131:
:* Australia  
:* Australia  
:* HIMSS Asia_Pac -  
:* HIMSS Asia_Pac -  
:* MOU with ICE –  
:* ICE-PAC: Ken provided an update on a recent meeting about the ICE standard. Participants were largely academics sponsored by DOD or __ . Presentations were made by FDA, U of PA, U of IL Urbana Champagne, Kansas State, LiveData, Dick Moberg, and others. Tracy Rausch presented the gap analysis that PCD has participated in. Moberg Research is using 11073 in some fashion. On the second day Ken and John provided information on IHE, RTM. It appeared that many working in this area were not aware of the IHE efforts.
:* MOU with ICE – PAC -
:* HITSP  
:* HITSP  
:* Continua
:* Continua
::- PCD/Continua collaboration ballot went only to IHE members; if a member didn’t receive it please contact a cochair.
:* PCD Report to Board has been delivered.
:* PCD webinar in the IHE webinar series last week. Ken asked how well this was publicized and where. Other than mention during a committee meeting no one was aware of the series.
:* Validation and Verification: These terms have been used, but not necessarily correctly in the context of the FDA, Connectathon and IHE. The PCD and IHE do not provide either. Validation is a well defined legal term and doesn’t apply to PCD’s work. Ken indicated that certification is the goal. Ken will develop a description of the various pieces and PCD’s goals and approaches. Todd will modify the PCD presentation slides to be more accurate by referring to conformance. Christoff mentioned an HL7 section on conformance (HL7 v 2.6).
:*


'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
Line 266: Line 155:


[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Category:PCD Meeting]]
[[Category:PCD Meeting Archive]]

Latest revision as of 14:44, 17 May 2010

Patient Care Device Domain

Meeting Purpose

Regularly scheduled meeting of the PCD Planning Committee

WebEx Information

Topic: PCD Committee Tcons

Date: Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Time: 11:00 am, Eastern Time (New York )

Duration: 60 Minutes

Proposed Agenda

updated with selected information from July 22 as a placeholder

Please Add Your Suggestions

  • PIV/DEC Changes Proposals
  • IDCO move to TI
  • WAN alignment
  • Continua MoU extension
  • ICE/PIC Meeting
  • PCD report to IHE Board
  • Webinar (7-30-2009 link not yet posted)
  • Product validation and verification - PCD mission
  • Update on White Papers and Supplements:
  • ACM
  • DPI
  • Medical Equipment Management
  • PIV/Infusion Pump
  • RTM
  • IDCO
  • WCM
  • Connectathon/Showcase kick-off July 30th
  • PCD Showcase Planning with HIMSS to begin shortly
  • Review Action Items
  • New Business

Discussion Summary and Action Items from Previous Meetings

Updated With meeting of July 22 PCD PC 2009-07-22 Webex

See PCD Planning Committee Action Items page.

Decision meetings will have minutes that require approval. This may be accomplished by email ballot.

Participants

Chair: Steve Merritt
  • Jon Blasingame, Rita Brahmbhatt, Randy Carroll, Anupriyo Chakravarti, Todd Cooper, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, Colin FX Gartska, Christoff Gessner, Rich Hillman, Sarah Hopkins, Steven Large, Brad Lunde, Sandra Martinez, Steve Merritt, Gary Meyer, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, Jeff Rinda, Paul Schluter, Ioana Singureanu, Greg Staudenmaier, John Zaleski, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst

Discussion

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Accepted

Action(s):

2 Discussion Summary
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
  • Summary of last meeting was accepted as posted

Action(s):

3 Action Items Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Action Items were deferred

  • 41: Monitor FDA actions on Universal Device ID -
  • 71: Recruit clinicians -
  • 72: Press releases as recruiting tool -
  • 74: Mapping PCD into v3 CDA -
  • 78: 2009 Survey Development -
  • 82: Users Guide -
  • 86: Contribute to, or develop a glossary -
  • 90: Monitor HITSP’s Work (also on TC list) -
  • 91: Develop New Brief Profile Proposals for Cycle 5 -
  • 92: Vendor Recruiting for Cycle 5 -
  • 93: Certification of Systems Claiming Conformance -

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

4 Profile and White Paper Updates
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
  • Updates
Manny suggested that all profiles indicate that RTM is required with explanation of how to handle existing and future (not yet included) coding.
TF/DEC - No change.
ACM - Monroe indicated that the TI update will be discussed tomorrow. Ken noted that there may be waveform snippets accompanying alarm messages and this is also being addressed. It differs from regularly scheduled waveform communication.
DPI – Meets tomorrow. Goal is WP for distribution at the end of the month.
IDCO - IDCO release as TI is out for ballot. The WG is working on IEEE nomenclature.
MEM - The WP will be presented at next week’s TC and then will go to ballot for release as public comment.
PIV/Infusion Pump - Pump CPs were approved for release for ballot in the TC meeting earlier today. TI version 2 will follow the ballot.
RTM - CPs will be discussed in the WG then provided to the TC for release for ballot next week.
WCM - Meets today. There’s an issue of whether this is a separate profile or is integrated into DEC. If in DEC there’s a question of how to provide visibility to purchasers. This is similar to the RTM issue.


Semantic Architecture –
Regulatory Considerations -

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

5 Announcements
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
  • Connectathon and Showcase
  • F2F
  • User Handbook –
  • Australia
  • HIMSS Asia_Pac -
  • ICE-PAC: Ken provided an update on a recent meeting about the ICE standard. Participants were largely academics sponsored by DOD or __ . Presentations were made by FDA, U of PA, U of IL Urbana Champagne, Kansas State, LiveData, Dick Moberg, and others. Tracy Rausch presented the gap analysis that PCD has participated in. Moberg Research is using 11073 in some fashion. On the second day Ken and John provided information on IHE, RTM. It appeared that many working in this area were not aware of the IHE efforts.
  • MOU with ICE – PAC -
  • HITSP
  • Continua
- PCD/Continua collaboration ballot went only to IHE members; if a member didn’t receive it please contact a cochair.
  • PCD Report to Board has been delivered.
  • PCD webinar in the IHE webinar series last week. Ken asked how well this was publicized and where. Other than mention during a committee meeting no one was aware of the series.
  • Validation and Verification: These terms have been used, but not necessarily correctly in the context of the FDA, Connectathon and IHE. The PCD and IHE do not provide either. Validation is a well defined legal term and doesn’t apply to PCD’s work. Ken indicated that certification is the goal. Ken will develop a description of the various pieces and PCD’s goals and approaches. Todd will modify the PCD presentation slides to be more accurate by referring to conformance. Christoff mentioned an HL7 section on conformance (HL7 v 2.6).

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):


Next Meeting

The next meeting will be August 19, 2009: PCD PC 2009-08-19 Webex.

<For Decision Meetings add review line here when minutes are approved; e.g., "(Reviewed & approved by PCD RTM Vent TG 2008-04-16)">

PCD Home