PCD DPI 2009-01-23 WebEx: Difference between revisions
ToddCooper (talk | contribs) m →Discussion: link corrected |
m →Next Meeting: archive |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:1 Review Work to Date | :1 Review Work to Date | ||
:2 Discuss DPI Roadmap Going Forward | :2 Discuss DPI Roadmap Going Forward | ||
::* Detailed Proposal Template | |||
::* Coordination | |||
::* Development Schedule | |||
::* ... | |||
:3 Assign Tasks | :3 Assign Tasks | ||
:4 Open discussion | :4 Open discussion | ||
| Line 36: | Line 40: | ||
:'''Chair/Host:''' Todd Cooper (BSF) | :'''Chair/Host:''' Todd Cooper (BSF) | ||
: | : Jon Camp (Philips), Ken Fuchs (Draeger), Steve Merritt (Baystate Health), John Rhoads (Philips), Richard Roa (Respironics), Jan Wittenber (Philips) | ||
=== Discussion === | === Discussion === | ||
''': ROUGH NOTES:''' | |||
:::1. Reviewed the schedule (in mmap), process going forward | |||
2. (Jan) who is willing & able to participate in DPI ... given the amouunt of time since 2008.10 brief profile proposals. Who on the call and not on the call (but in PCD) will be working on these? DPI - "integration" implies relationships between other areas (e.g., infusion, ventilation, etc. or alarms or DEC ... ) being addressed | |||
Richard - most interested in the vent Rosetta ... more passive on this one. | |||
Ken Fuchs - planning on participation; noted that ISO/IEC require BOTH project approval + sufficient development team to make it fly. | |||
As WP topics get considered, additional participants will engage. | |||
*** WP Template: Just replace Discussion w/ sections 6-9 | |||
*** Supplements use this template | |||
<note need to get an example #9 ... ITI?> | |||
3. (Jan) PnP vs. DPI ... + ICE-PAC group ... <explained why this changed in the PCD work> .. .not explicitly part of ICE use cases being considered | |||
4. ACTION: Clearly define the relationships between various activities. How will the anticipated clinical workflow changes be supported by these various activities? | |||
5. Long discussion of relationship between standards, IHE profiles ... gaps ... scheduling (e.g., wait until std complete) ... etc. | |||
Rosetta => Rosetta => NIST Tool for specializations => DPI Interfaces ... !!! | |||
*** Show relationship w/ SemCity & DPI connectivity | |||
*** Need to show device specialization profiles (all 3 volumes) | |||
*** Need to show clinical workflow profiles (all 3 or 4? volumes) | |||
IOW - Need to show how all these profiles & tools integrate to provide the support the industry needs to achieve interoperability. | |||
ACTION: Review PCD road map slides for how these pieces fit together. | |||
ACTION: Fold in the discussion content into the WP defintion & other proposals | |||
ACTION: Review draft detailed proposals by next Thursday WebEx. | |||
LOAD FILES ON FTP SITE (convert mmap to WIKI) | |||
''': END ROUGH NOTES''' | |||
:{|border="2" | :{|border="2" | ||
| Line 50: | Line 93: | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
| Line 103: | Line 145: | ||
''(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG | ''(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG [[PCD_DPI_2009-01-29_WebEx | 2009.01.29 WebEx Discussion]])'' | ||
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | [[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | ||
[[Category:PCD Meeting]] | [[Category: PCD Meeting Archive]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:43, 26 May 2009
Meeting Purpose
IHE PCD Device Point-of-care Integration (DPI) profile development discussions.
WebEx Information
Topic: IHE PCD DPI Profile TG
Date: Friday, January 23, 2009
Time: 15:00, Eastern Time (GMT -05:00, New York)
Duration: 120 Minutes
Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.
Contact Manny Furst for more information.
Proposed Agenda
- 1 Review Work to Date
- 2 Discuss DPI Roadmap Going Forward
- Detailed Proposal Template
- Coordination
- Development Schedule
- ...
- 3 Assign Tasks
- 4 Open discussion
Attachments / Materials
(No attachments)
Minutes
Participants
- Chair/Host: Todd Cooper (BSF)
- Jon Camp (Philips), Ken Fuchs (Draeger), Steve Merritt (Baystate Health), John Rhoads (Philips), Richard Roa (Respironics), Jan Wittenber (Philips)
Discussion
: ROUGH NOTES:
- 1. Reviewed the schedule (in mmap), process going forward
2. (Jan) who is willing & able to participate in DPI ... given the amouunt of time since 2008.10 brief profile proposals. Who on the call and not on the call (but in PCD) will be working on these? DPI - "integration" implies relationships between other areas (e.g., infusion, ventilation, etc. or alarms or DEC ... ) being addressed
Richard - most interested in the vent Rosetta ... more passive on this one.
Ken Fuchs - planning on participation; noted that ISO/IEC require BOTH project approval + sufficient development team to make it fly.
As WP topics get considered, additional participants will engage.
- WP Template: Just replace Discussion w/ sections 6-9
- Supplements use this template
<note need to get an example #9 ... ITI?>
3. (Jan) PnP vs. DPI ... + ICE-PAC group ... <explained why this changed in the PCD work> .. .not explicitly part of ICE use cases being considered
4. ACTION: Clearly define the relationships between various activities. How will the anticipated clinical workflow changes be supported by these various activities?
5. Long discussion of relationship between standards, IHE profiles ... gaps ... scheduling (e.g., wait until std complete) ... etc.
Rosetta => Rosetta => NIST Tool for specializations => DPI Interfaces ... !!!
*** Show relationship w/ SemCity & DPI connectivity
*** Need to show device specialization profiles (all 3 volumes)
*** Need to show clinical workflow profiles (all 3 or 4? volumes)
IOW - Need to show how all these profiles & tools integrate to provide the support the industry needs to achieve interoperability.
ACTION: Review PCD road map slides for how these pieces fit together.
ACTION: Fold in the discussion content into the WP defintion & other proposals
ACTION: Review draft detailed proposals by next Thursday WebEx.
LOAD FILES ON FTP SITE (convert mmap to WIKI)
: END ROUGH NOTES
Item Topic Discussion 1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
2 Approval of Minutes
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
3 ...
- tbdStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
4 ...
- GroupStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
5 DPI Brife Profile Proposal Review
- GroupStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
6 Next Meeting
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Next meeting Thursday 2009.01.29
Action(s):
Next Meeting
NOTE: Next Meeting Thursday 2009.01.29
(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG 2009.01.29 WebEx Discussion)