HL7 Review Task Force 2008-06-27: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Attendees== | ==Attendees== | ||
Yongjian Bao PhD, GE | * Yongjian Bao PhD, GE | ||
Chris Lindop, GE | * Chris Lindop, GE | ||
Lisa Spellman, HIMSS | * Lisa Spellman, HIMSS | ||
Chris Carr, RSNA | * Chris Carr, RSNA | ||
Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA | * Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA | ||
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== | ||
===Reconciling PAM and SWF=== | ===Reconciling PAM and SWF=== | ||
* Comparison of Trigger Events | * Comparison of Trigger Events | ||
** Yongjian Bao provided a [ | ** Yongjian Bao provided a [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/CoChairs/hl7_task_force/PAM%20vs%20SWF.xls spreadsheet comparing trigger events in SWF and PAM] | ||
** Work through with Task Force on Next tcon | ** Work through with Task Force on Next tcon | ||
| Line 36: | Line 26: | ||
* PAM vs SWF: Comparison of Trigger Events | * PAM vs SWF: Comparison of Trigger Events | ||
* Proposal for reconciling text on handling HL7 versions in ITI and Rad TFs | * Proposal for reconciling text on handling HL7 versions in ITI and Rad TFs | ||
[[HL7 Review Task Force]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:32, 31 July 2008
Attendees
- Yongjian Bao PhD, GE
- Chris Lindop, GE
- Lisa Spellman, HIMSS
- Chris Carr, RSNA
- Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA
Minutes
Reconciling PAM and SWF
- Comparison of Trigger Events
- Yongjian Bao provided a spreadsheet comparing trigger events in SWF and PAM
- Work through with Task Force on Next tcon
Cleaning Up Inconsistencies in Text about HL7 Versioning in Rad TF and ITI TF
- Comparison of Rad TF section 2.3 and 2.4 (Message Control and Conventions) with ITI TF Appendix C
- Goal to develop shared, consistent text on managing version differences
- Needs a clear statement on how HL7 version number attribute is defined and handled
- Clarify requirements for acknowledgment mode for both sender and received side (currently only defined for receiver)
- Clarify notation and other inconsistencies in the texts
- Use Rad TF text as a basis for normative text for systems using HL7 v. 2.3.1 and use ITI TF Appendix C as starting point for rules about using HL7 v 2.5
- Goal is to have a section of ITI TF as the "canonical" statement of managing HL7 versions; Rad TF and others (Eye Care, Cardio, etc) would reference this section
- Goal to develop shared, consistent text on managing version differences
Next Meeting
- Thursday, July 17, 9am CDT
- PAM vs SWF: Comparison of Trigger Events
- Proposal for reconciling text on handling HL7 versions in ITI and Rad TFs