Talk:1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.1.2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
Issue: Schematron rule misfiring... |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Fixed: 12:37, 2 October 2008 (CDT) [[User:Kboone|Kboone]] === | |||
Added clarification<br/> | |||
:Need to clarify that these are abstract specifications that need to be further defined. {{{3|}}} | |||
{{Fixme | | |||
We believe there is an issue with the auto-generated schematron rule: | |||
<!-- Verify the document type code --> | |||
<assert test='cda:code[@code = "{{{LOINC}}}"]'> | |||
Error: The document type code of a Medical Summary must be {{{LOINC}}} | |||
</assert> | |||
The rule should either not exist or there should be a valid LOINC code in there, not "{{{LOINC}}}". | |||
(See also [[Talk:1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.1.1]].) | |||
}} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:16, 23 December 2008
Fixed: 12:37, 2 October 2008 (CDT) Kboone
Added clarification
- Need to clarify that these are abstract specifications that need to be further defined.
-->>
We believe there is an issue with the auto-generated schematron rule:
<!-- Verify the document type code -->
<assert test='cda:code[@code = "{{{LOINC}}}"]'>
Error: The document type code of a Medical Summary must be {{{LOINC}}}
</assert>
The rule should either not exist or there should be a valid LOINC code in there, not "{{{LOINC}}}".
(See also Talk:1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.1.1.)
<<--