Rad Plan Minutes 07.10.24: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Kevino (talk | contribs)
Kevino (talk | contribs)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Attendees:===
===Attendees:===
* Chris Lindop, GE – Radiology Planning Co-chair - voting
* Kevin O’Donnell, Toshiba – Radiology Planning Co-chair, voting
* Ellie Avraham, Carestream - Radiology Technical Co-chair, voting
* Ruth Berge, GE – not voting
* Chris Carr, RSNA, not voting
* David Clunie, RadPharm, voting
* Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA, not voting
* Lynn Felhofer, Technical Project Manager, not voting
* Cindy Levy, Merge, voting
* Cor Loef, Philips, voting by phone – no Webex Access
* John Paganini, Guardian Health, voting
* Dave Robaska, Cerner, voting
* Paul Seifert, Agfa, voting
* Niki Wirsz, Siemens, voting




 
The Agenda and proposed selection method were reviewed.




==Proposal Review==
==Proposal Review==


Radiation Dose
The 7 Detailed Proposals were summarized (5 min each) and discussed (10-15 min each).
:* 25% .......for dose capture and submission to registries
:* 30-35% ..to also support download of Dose benchmarks/statistics


Enhanced DICOM
Tech Cmte Maintenance work was estimated at around 5% this year.
:* 35% ......for 3 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine)
* Few CPs in queue, No major CPs, No urgent CPs, Large numbers of CPs not expected
:* 55% ......for 4 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine, Cardiac Imaging)
* Some work may be required for NM
* Significant Editing not expected for Spanish or Japanese National Extensions
* German National Extension possible, but likely not until spring


Mammo CAD Workflow
:* 35% ......Mammo CAD Profile as described (triggers and behaviors)


PDI for Large Datasets
The Proposals, effort estimates for one or more defined approaches, and and straw poll popularity (choose two favorites) are listed here:
:* 30%


Mammo Acquisition Workflow
{| style="width:95%" border="1" cellpadding="3"
:* 35-45% .....if Profile based on current SWF  
! Proposal
:* 10-15% .....if just a User's Handbook on how to deploy Mammo Acquisition with the current SWF
! Alternative Approaches with estimated % effort
! Straw Poll
|-
|Radiation Dose
|
* 25% .......for dose capture and submission to registries
* 30-35% ..to also support download of Dose benchmarks/statistics
|2
|-
|Enhanced DICOM
|
* 35% ......for 3 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine)
* 55% ......for 4 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine, Cardiac Imaging)
|3
|-
|Mammo CAD Workflow
|
* 35% ......Mammo CAD Profile as described (triggers and behaviors)
|0
|-
|PDI for Large Datasets
|
* 30%
* Note: DVD Compatibility testing to gather concrete information on the scale and nature of the problem will take place at the January Connectathon regardless of whether a profile is scheduled for development this year.
|4
|-
|Mammo Acquisition Workflow
|
* 35-45% .....if Profile based on current SWF  
* 10-15% .....if just a User's Handbook on how to deploy Mammo Acquisition with the current SWF
|3
|-
|Scheduled Workflow 2.0
|
* 200% ...........SWF II over two years. No public comment this year.  Interim Whitepaper for Mammography Acquisition.
* 105%/105% ..Develop Ordering (HL7) this year; Acquisition (DICOM) the next.  Risk of missing dependencies.
* 50%/160% ....Develop Use Cases this year; Profile the next year or two.
|6
|-
|Critical Results
|
* N/A (PCC plans to evaluate the detailed proposal)
|0
|}


Scheduled Workflow 2.0
:* 200% ...........SWF II over two years. No public comment this year.  Interim Whitepaper for Mammography Acquisition.
:* 105%/105% ..Develop Ordering (HL7) this year; Acquisition (DICOM) the next.  Risk of missing dependencies.
:* 50%/160% ....Develop Use Cases this year; Profile the next year or two.


Critical Results
Reporting is going to move out of band.
:* N/A


==Work Package Nominations==


Maintenance is estimated at around 5% this year.
Eight alternative work packages were nominated.
* No major CP, NatExt.


Reporting is going to move out of band.
{| style="width:95%" border="1" cellpadding="3"
! Package  !! Work Items (and % effort)                            !! Ballot 1 !! Ballot 2 !! Ballot 3
|-
| Package A || Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%)            || 3        ||  5      || 7   
|-
| Package B || SWF 50%, Rad Dose 20%, PDI 30%  (100%)                || 0        ||  -      || -   
|-
| Package C || SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, Enhanced DICOM 35% (100%)    || 2        ||  2      || -
|-
| Package D || Rad Dose 30%, Enhanced DICOM 35%, Mammo Acq 15% (80%) || 1        ||  -      || -   
|-
| Package E || Rad Dose 20%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (115%)  || 1        ||  -      || -
|-
| Package F || Enhanced DICOM 55%, PDI 30%, Mammo Acq 15% (100%)    || 2        ||  3      || 3 
|-
| Package G || Mammo Acq 15%, SWF 50%, Rad Dose 30% (95%)            || 1        ||  -      || -
|-
| Package H || SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (95%)                || 0        ||  -      || -
|}


==Work Package Nominations==
==Selection==


Package A: Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%)
Package A: Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%)


Package B: SWF 50%, Rad Dose 20%, PDI 30%  (100%)
Package C: SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, Enhanced DICOM 35% (100%)
Package D: Rad Dose 30%, Enhanced DICOM 35%/55%, Mammo Acq 15% (80%)


Package E: Rad Dose 20%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (115%)
==Next Meeting==
A teleconference was scheduled for Oct 31, 11am Central to address presentations for Radiology sessions at RSNA.


Package F: Enhanced DICOM 55%, PDI 30%, Mammo Acq 15% (100%)
Another meeting will be scheduled to discuss:
* IHE Domain Application Preparation
* CoChair elections


==Selection==
[[Category:Minutes]]

Latest revision as of 15:26, 15 November 2007

Attendees:

  • Chris Lindop, GE – Radiology Planning Co-chair - voting
  • Kevin O’Donnell, Toshiba – Radiology Planning Co-chair, voting
  • Ellie Avraham, Carestream - Radiology Technical Co-chair, voting
  • Ruth Berge, GE – not voting
  • Chris Carr, RSNA, not voting
  • David Clunie, RadPharm, voting
  • Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA, not voting
  • Lynn Felhofer, Technical Project Manager, not voting
  • Cindy Levy, Merge, voting
  • Cor Loef, Philips, voting by phone – no Webex Access
  • John Paganini, Guardian Health, voting
  • Dave Robaska, Cerner, voting
  • Paul Seifert, Agfa, voting
  • Niki Wirsz, Siemens, voting


The Agenda and proposed selection method were reviewed.


Proposal Review

The 7 Detailed Proposals were summarized (5 min each) and discussed (10-15 min each).

Tech Cmte Maintenance work was estimated at around 5% this year.

  • Few CPs in queue, No major CPs, No urgent CPs, Large numbers of CPs not expected
  • Some work may be required for NM
  • Significant Editing not expected for Spanish or Japanese National Extensions
  • German National Extension possible, but likely not until spring


The Proposals, effort estimates for one or more defined approaches, and and straw poll popularity (choose two favorites) are listed here:

Proposal Alternative Approaches with estimated % effort Straw Poll
Radiation Dose
  • 25% .......for dose capture and submission to registries
  • 30-35% ..to also support download of Dose benchmarks/statistics
2
Enhanced DICOM
  • 35% ......for 3 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine)
  • 55% ......for 4 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine, Cardiac Imaging)
3
Mammo CAD Workflow
  • 35% ......Mammo CAD Profile as described (triggers and behaviors)
0
PDI for Large Datasets
  • 30%
  • Note: DVD Compatibility testing to gather concrete information on the scale and nature of the problem will take place at the January Connectathon regardless of whether a profile is scheduled for development this year.
4
Mammo Acquisition Workflow
  • 35-45% .....if Profile based on current SWF
  • 10-15% .....if just a User's Handbook on how to deploy Mammo Acquisition with the current SWF
3
Scheduled Workflow 2.0
  • 200% ...........SWF II over two years. No public comment this year. Interim Whitepaper for Mammography Acquisition.
  • 105%/105% ..Develop Ordering (HL7) this year; Acquisition (DICOM) the next. Risk of missing dependencies.
  • 50%/160% ....Develop Use Cases this year; Profile the next year or two.
6
Critical Results
  • N/A (PCC plans to evaluate the detailed proposal)
0


Reporting is going to move out of band.

Work Package Nominations

Eight alternative work packages were nominated.

Package Work Items (and % effort) Ballot 1 Ballot 2 Ballot 3
Package A Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%) 3 5 7
Package B SWF 50%, Rad Dose 20%, PDI 30% (100%) 0 - -
Package C SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, Enhanced DICOM 35% (100%) 2 2 -
Package D Rad Dose 30%, Enhanced DICOM 35%, Mammo Acq 15% (80%) 1 - -
Package E Rad Dose 20%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (115%) 1 - -
Package F Enhanced DICOM 55%, PDI 30%, Mammo Acq 15% (100%) 2 3 3
Package G Mammo Acq 15%, SWF 50%, Rad Dose 30% (95%) 1 - -
Package H SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (95%) 0 - -

Selection

Package A: Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%)


Next Meeting

A teleconference was scheduled for Oct 31, 11am Central to address presentations for Radiology sessions at RSNA.

Another meeting will be scheduled to discuss:

  • IHE Domain Application Preparation
  • CoChair elections