Rad Plan Minutes 07.10.24: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Kevino (talk | contribs)
Kevino (talk | contribs)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Attendees:===
===Attendees:===
* Chris Lindop, GE – Radiology Planning Co-chair - voting
* Kevin O’Donnell, Toshiba – Radiology Planning Co-chair, voting
* Ellie Avraham, Carestream - Radiology Technical Co-chair, voting
* Ruth Berge, GE – not voting
* Chris Carr, RSNA, not voting
* David Clunie, RadPharm, voting
* Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA, not voting
* Lynn Felhofer, Technical Project Manager, not voting
* Cindy Levy, Merge, voting
* Cor Loef, Philips, voting by phone – no Webex Access
* John Paganini, Guardian Health, voting
* Dave Robaska, Cerner, voting
* Paul Seifert, Agfa, voting
* Niki Wirsz, Siemens, voting




The Agenda and proposed selection method were reviewed.




==Proposal Review==
The 7 Detailed Proposals were summarized (5 min each) and discussed (10-15 min each).
Tech Cmte Maintenance work was estimated at around 5% this year.
* Few CPs in queue, No major CPs, No urgent CPs, Large numbers of CPs not expected
* Some work may be required for NM
* Significant Editing not expected for Spanish or Japanese National Extensions
* German National Extension possible, but likely not until spring


==Proposal Review==


Radiation Dose
The Proposals, effort estimates for one or more defined approaches, and and straw poll popularity (choose two favorites) are listed here:
:* 25% .......for dose capture and submission to registries
:* 30-35% ..to also support download of Dose benchmarks/statistics


Enhanced DICOM
{| style="width:95%" border="1" cellpadding="3"
:* 35% ......for 3 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine)
! Proposal
:* 55% ......for 4 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine, Cardiac Imaging)
! Alternative Approaches with estimated % effort
! Straw Poll
|-
|Radiation Dose
|
* 25% .......for dose capture and submission to registries
* 30-35% ..to also support download of Dose benchmarks/statistics
|2
|-
|Enhanced DICOM
|
* 35% ......for 3 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine)
* 55% ......for 4 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine, Cardiac Imaging)
|3
|-
|Mammo CAD Workflow
|
* 35% ......Mammo CAD Profile as described (triggers and behaviors)
|0
|-
|PDI for Large Datasets
|
* 30%
* Note: DVD Compatibility testing to gather concrete information on the scale and nature of the problem will take place at the January Connectathon regardless of whether a profile is scheduled for development this year.
|4
|-
|Mammo Acquisition Workflow
|
* 35-45% .....if Profile based on current SWF
* 10-15% .....if just a User's Handbook on how to deploy Mammo Acquisition with the current SWF
|3
|-
|Scheduled Workflow 2.0
|
* 200% ...........SWF II over two years. No public comment this year.  Interim Whitepaper for Mammography Acquisition.
* 105%/105% ..Develop Ordering (HL7) this year; Acquisition (DICOM) the next.  Risk of missing dependencies.
* 50%/160% ....Develop Use Cases this year; Profile the next year or two.
|6
|-
|Critical Results
|
* N/A (PCC plans to evaluate the detailed proposal)
|0
|}


Mammo CAD Workflow
:* 35% ......Mammo CAD Profile as described (triggers and behaviors)


PDI for Large Datasets
Reporting is going to move out of band.
:* 30%


Mammo Acquisition Workflow
==Work Package Nominations==
:* 35-45% .....if Profile based on current SWF
:* 10-15% .....if just a User's Handbook on how to deploy Mammo Acquisition with the current SWF


Scheduled Workflow 2.0
Eight alternative work packages were nominated.
:* 200% ...........SWF II over two years. No public comment this year.  Interim Whitepaper for Mammography Acquisition.
:* 105%/105% ..Develop Ordering (HL7) this year; Acquisition (DICOM) the next.  Risk of missing dependencies.
:* 50%/160% ....Develop Use Cases this year; Profile the next year or two.


Critical Results
{| style="width:95%" border="1" cellpadding="3"
:* N/A
! Package  !! Work Items (and % effort)                            !! Ballot 1 !! Ballot 2 !! Ballot 3
|-
| Package A || Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%)            || 3        ||  5      || 7   
|-
| Package B || SWF 50%, Rad Dose 20%, PDI 30%  (100%)                || 0        ||  -      || -   
|-
| Package C || SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, Enhanced DICOM 35% (100%)    || 2        ||  2      || -
|-
| Package D || Rad Dose 30%, Enhanced DICOM 35%, Mammo Acq 15% (80%) || 1        ||  -      || -   
|-
| Package E || Rad Dose 20%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (115%)  || 1        ||  -      || -
|-
| Package F || Enhanced DICOM 55%, PDI 30%, Mammo Acq 15% (100%)    || 2        ||  3      || 3 
|-
| Package G || Mammo Acq 15%, SWF 50%, Rad Dose 30% (95%)            || 1        ||  -      || -
|-
| Package H || SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (95%)                || 0        ||  -      || -
|}


==Selection==


Maintenance is estimated at around 5% this year.
Package A: Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%)
* No major CP, NatExt.


Reporting is going to move out of band.


==Work Package Nominations==
==Next Meeting==
A teleconference was scheduled for Oct 31, 11am Central to address presentations for Radiology sessions at RSNA.


Another meeting will be scheduled to discuss:
* IHE Domain Application Preparation
* CoChair elections


==Selection==
[[Category:Minutes]]

Latest revision as of 15:26, 15 November 2007

Attendees:

  • Chris Lindop, GE – Radiology Planning Co-chair - voting
  • Kevin O’Donnell, Toshiba – Radiology Planning Co-chair, voting
  • Ellie Avraham, Carestream - Radiology Technical Co-chair, voting
  • Ruth Berge, GE – not voting
  • Chris Carr, RSNA, not voting
  • David Clunie, RadPharm, voting
  • Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA, not voting
  • Lynn Felhofer, Technical Project Manager, not voting
  • Cindy Levy, Merge, voting
  • Cor Loef, Philips, voting by phone – no Webex Access
  • John Paganini, Guardian Health, voting
  • Dave Robaska, Cerner, voting
  • Paul Seifert, Agfa, voting
  • Niki Wirsz, Siemens, voting


The Agenda and proposed selection method were reviewed.


Proposal Review

The 7 Detailed Proposals were summarized (5 min each) and discussed (10-15 min each).

Tech Cmte Maintenance work was estimated at around 5% this year.

  • Few CPs in queue, No major CPs, No urgent CPs, Large numbers of CPs not expected
  • Some work may be required for NM
  • Significant Editing not expected for Spanish or Japanese National Extensions
  • German National Extension possible, but likely not until spring


The Proposals, effort estimates for one or more defined approaches, and and straw poll popularity (choose two favorites) are listed here:

Proposal Alternative Approaches with estimated % effort Straw Poll
Radiation Dose
  • 25% .......for dose capture and submission to registries
  • 30-35% ..to also support download of Dose benchmarks/statistics
2
Enhanced DICOM
  • 35% ......for 3 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine)
  • 55% ......for 4 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine, Cardiac Imaging)
3
Mammo CAD Workflow
  • 35% ......Mammo CAD Profile as described (triggers and behaviors)
0
PDI for Large Datasets
  • 30%
  • Note: DVD Compatibility testing to gather concrete information on the scale and nature of the problem will take place at the January Connectathon regardless of whether a profile is scheduled for development this year.
4
Mammo Acquisition Workflow
  • 35-45% .....if Profile based on current SWF
  • 10-15% .....if just a User's Handbook on how to deploy Mammo Acquisition with the current SWF
3
Scheduled Workflow 2.0
  • 200% ...........SWF II over two years. No public comment this year. Interim Whitepaper for Mammography Acquisition.
  • 105%/105% ..Develop Ordering (HL7) this year; Acquisition (DICOM) the next. Risk of missing dependencies.
  • 50%/160% ....Develop Use Cases this year; Profile the next year or two.
6
Critical Results
  • N/A (PCC plans to evaluate the detailed proposal)
0


Reporting is going to move out of band.

Work Package Nominations

Eight alternative work packages were nominated.

Package Work Items (and % effort) Ballot 1 Ballot 2 Ballot 3
Package A Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%) 3 5 7
Package B SWF 50%, Rad Dose 20%, PDI 30% (100%) 0 - -
Package C SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, Enhanced DICOM 35% (100%) 2 2 -
Package D Rad Dose 30%, Enhanced DICOM 35%, Mammo Acq 15% (80%) 1 - -
Package E Rad Dose 20%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (115%) 1 - -
Package F Enhanced DICOM 55%, PDI 30%, Mammo Acq 15% (100%) 2 3 3
Package G Mammo Acq 15%, SWF 50%, Rad Dose 30% (95%) 1 - -
Package H SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (95%) 0 - -

Selection

Package A: Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%)


Next Meeting

A teleconference was scheduled for Oct 31, 11am Central to address presentations for Radiology sessions at RSNA.

Another meeting will be scheduled to discuss:

  • IHE Domain Application Preparation
  • CoChair elections