Difference between revisions of "PCCTech Minutes 2012 07 19"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* Review of change proposal | * Review of change proposal | ||
* Decided we needed to split the proposal into at least two change proposals. The first to be of the simple clean up and reorganization issues. The second to include all proposed additions. It is likely there are more consequences to the additions and need more review and study. | * Decided we needed to split the proposal into at least two change proposals. The first to be of the simple clean up and reorganization issues. The second to include all proposed additions. It is likely there are more consequences to the additions and need more review and study. | ||
| − | * Discussion re: value sets being coupled or de-coupled. Having SHALL value sets may limit the uptake of the profiles. In this case requiring LOINC codes can be a limiting factor. Proposal to change SHALL to MAY. | + | * Discussion re: value sets being coupled or de-coupled. Having SHALL value sets may limit the uptake of the profiles. In this case requiring LOINC codes can be a limiting factor. Proposal to change SHALL to MAY. This is a larger discussion that could affect all profiles. |
| + | * Do not need to call out payers specifically. They are included in the Medical Summary Parent Document. For the US there will need to be a national extension (Volume 4) to call out the requirement (R or R2) for the payer section. A section that is not as needed in other countries. | ||
| + | * | ||
Revision as of 11:20, 19 July 2012
Attendees: Laura Heermann Langford, Anne Diamond, Claudio Saccavini, Mauro Zanardini, Vincent van Pelt, Tone Southerland, Emma Jones, Denise Downing, Laura Bright, Thom Kuhn
Call in Attendees: Valentina Ferrarini,
TeleHomeMonitoring
eReferral
Joint with QRPH
- Review of change proposal
- Decided we needed to split the proposal into at least two change proposals. The first to be of the simple clean up and reorganization issues. The second to include all proposed additions. It is likely there are more consequences to the additions and need more review and study.
- Discussion re: value sets being coupled or de-coupled. Having SHALL value sets may limit the uptake of the profiles. In this case requiring LOINC codes can be a limiting factor. Proposal to change SHALL to MAY. This is a larger discussion that could affect all profiles.
- Do not need to call out payers specifically. They are included in the Medical Summary Parent Document. For the US there will need to be a national extension (Volume 4) to call out the requirement (R or R2) for the payer section. A section that is not as needed in other countries.