Difference between revisions of "Radiology Roadmap"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: ===Problems to Consider=== This is just a set of links to "pain-points" identified by various sources that might benefit from better integration. [[Inpatient Imaging Workflow Probl...) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ''<We do not currently have a roadmap document. We agree we need one. The following points came out of the discussion at our [[Rad_Plan_Minutes_07.06.13|face-to-face mtg]]>'' | ||
+ | Theme Areas: | ||
+ | * Image Sharing | ||
+ | * Advanced Reporting | ||
+ | * Measuring Quality and Performance | ||
+ | * Advanced Workflow | ||
+ | For each outline the nature of the needs, the work to date (profiles), the available standards and areas/proposal topics for future work. | ||
+ | * '''What purpose should the Roadmap serve?''' | ||
+ | ** parking lot for stuff not done yet | ||
+ | ** planning tool to see all the pieces | ||
+ | ** PR value to show things are not forgotten | ||
+ | ** logistics value to recognize the pre-requisites | ||
+ | *** another flavor of this is multi-year projects | ||
+ | *** should be careful to break it into useful subpieces | ||
+ | ** show some long term goals/themes | ||
+ | ** link to other domains for logistics/consistency | ||
+ | * '''Start with a "vision" statement - high level goals''' | ||
+ | ** Chris will get RSNA to take a shot. | ||
+ | ** should be ready for the matrix work | ||
+ | * '''Do the exercise of pasting brief proposals onto a matrix''' | ||
+ | ** Ought to be F2F | ||
+ | ** We should be doing more international meetings | ||
+ | ** '''October - HIMSS World of HIT in Vienna, Oct 22-25 Proposed - Need to Confirm''' | ||
+ | ** might like to coordinate with other international committees | ||
+ | ** try to do one mtg per year alternating between Asia and Europe with main meeting base in U.S. (where the secretariat is) | ||
+ | * '''Review other domain roadmaps for ideas/context''' | ||
+ | ** '''Kevin can collect we can discuss with above.''' | ||
+ | ** '''Ask DCC to work on a common format/flavor''' | ||
+ | * Should we add to the proposal process endorsements of professional societies and vendors? | ||
Line 9: | Line 38: | ||
This is just a set of links to "pain-points" identified by various sources that might benefit from better integration. | This is just a set of links to "pain-points" identified by various sources that might benefit from better integration. | ||
− | [[Inpatient Imaging Workflow Problems]] | + | :* [[Inpatient Imaging Workflow Problems]] |
Latest revision as of 11:20, 1 July 2009
<We do not currently have a roadmap document. We agree we need one. The following points came out of the discussion at our face-to-face mtg>
Theme Areas:
- Image Sharing
- Advanced Reporting
- Measuring Quality and Performance
- Advanced Workflow
For each outline the nature of the needs, the work to date (profiles), the available standards and areas/proposal topics for future work.
- What purpose should the Roadmap serve?
- parking lot for stuff not done yet
- planning tool to see all the pieces
- PR value to show things are not forgotten
- logistics value to recognize the pre-requisites
- another flavor of this is multi-year projects
- should be careful to break it into useful subpieces
- show some long term goals/themes
- link to other domains for logistics/consistency
- Start with a "vision" statement - high level goals
- Chris will get RSNA to take a shot.
- should be ready for the matrix work
- Do the exercise of pasting brief proposals onto a matrix
- Ought to be F2F
- We should be doing more international meetings
- October - HIMSS World of HIT in Vienna, Oct 22-25 Proposed - Need to Confirm
- might like to coordinate with other international committees
- try to do one mtg per year alternating between Asia and Europe with main meeting base in U.S. (where the secretariat is)
- Review other domain roadmaps for ideas/context
- Kevin can collect we can discuss with above.
- Ask DCC to work on a common format/flavor
- Should we add to the proposal process endorsements of professional societies and vendors?
Problems to Consider
This is just a set of links to "pain-points" identified by various sources that might benefit from better integration.