PaLM Conf Minutes 2023-May-03
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Attendees
Raj Dash | Jim McNulty |
Kevin Schap | Riki Merrick |
Megumi Kondo | Ralf Herzog |
Dan Rutz | Will Humphrey |
Alessandro Sulis | Ruben Fernandes |
Jan Schutrups | Jason Lowder |
Mary Kennedy | Francesca Frexia |
NEXT IHE PaLM MEETING June 13-14, 2023
- F2F Agenda
- 6/13:
- AM
- IHE SET test case review (1 – 1.5 hours)
- DPIO draft
- PM
- DPIO draft continued
- Proficiency testing profile
- IHE LAW updates to accommodate the device ID and UDI etc
- Use of FHIR – what are the candidates?
- FHIR was designed to be stateless – so workflow related where timing and triggering is involved is not the best candidate
- New features
- AM
- 6/14:
- AM
- DPIA CR
- DPIO follow up
- PM
- Update on DPIA
- CR for additional data elements between the LIS to scanner to properly populate the DICOM header in the scanner
- Draft on DPIO
- Next work item = Evidence creation
- need vendors in analytics space
- Evidence creation may be a good option for FHIR / DICOM
- Reconcile the pathology data model with the DICOM data model (DPIA section)) – see https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1PopzaRaS_vFEWXIvOnJaMpDzBPJAkSTQ/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=116119429285485236437&rtpof=true&sd=true
- Any updates from DICOM WG 26
- See more detailed agenda here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_9uz-4nrUYGBsWDkvKGRqDBq7WCwzG760E6FdEAXONA/edit?usp=sharing
- Update on DPIA
- AM
- 6/13:
- CR Follow up
- OML^O33 and OML^O34 message definitions
- add Container group pre-adopted from V2.9
- add SAC structure pre-adopted from V2.9
- Revote – since we changed the text a little – Mary will send this out
- Related to the DPIA functionality to communicate all DICOM header related elements in DPIA transactions
- OML^O33 and OML^O34 message definitions
- DPIA test cases https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Uxmbxgljh0dEfkKPL89Dz7XkQwnGSNlEkBXG-tyQzO4/edit#gid=717291144
- Ratify Pathology data model and adjust how to align it with the DICOM data model
- Add a comment to the pre-condition to remind folks to consider DICOM Supplement 122 for the information model – good topic for the meeting with DICOM WG26
- What is important for pathologist to see in order to decide why they want to retrieve this study
- Include the HL7 definition of the data element in background somewhere
- Accession number = DICOM case identifier = SAC-2
- Below that you would have the series and the image identifier
- What is the slide identifier vs the image / scan identifier
- Each slide has its own ID
- Barcode on the slide has the slide ID – per lab convention this slide ID will include the case and container etc = SAC-3
- We need to have the block ID, the slide ID and staining
- Let’s take a fake case and map it all out
- Case has 1 or more specimen, one or more blocks with one or more slides, which can have one or more images (series) – not sure we need to have the blocks represented in DICOM, unless a lab wants to have an image of every block
- Current model used by Sectra:
- All message types we leave at 2.5.1, but we pre-adopt some segments using 2.8.2 constructs
- Forward the message structure and instructions to the Gazelle team and wait for their comments back
- No vendors have subscribed for DPIA so far
- How can we make more folks aware of the fact that we are having DPIA ready for next connectathon
- Send to PaLM list and cc Anne Gaelle also – include link to the connectation registration and ask them to review the test cases – Kevin will forward to DICOM WG26