PaLM Conf Minutes 2022-July-13
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Attendees
Name |
---|
Riki Merrick |
Raj Dash |
Alessandro Sulis |
Roy (MIPS) |
Dan Rutz |
Francesca Frexia |
Jim Harrison |
Ruben Fernandes |
Takuya Haga |
Ralf Herzog |
Filip Migom |
Gianluca Pavan |
Jason Lowder |
Jim McNulty |
Alex Goel |
Mary Kennedy |
Kevin Schap |
Mandel Mickley |
Megumi Kondo |
David Beckman |
Discussion
- IHE PaLM F2F minutes – approve by general consent
- Update from ECDP: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1a1ao3GLSVdrUuOYkApeTfCI1YlOg4ZNi/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=116119429285485236437&rtpof=true&sd=true
- Markus shared this article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.07806.pdf - this covers his presentation
- Next Steps:
- get test cases worked out and need coordination with DICOM WG26
- List of vendors and their interest on which profile they would be interested in working on
- Leica and Roche are testing with Sectra on scanner to PACs integration (DICOM side)
- IA – needs to have integration with LIS as well as with PACs; EMPIA – presentation on use of apps – @Riki to share!
- Should the AI results go to PACs or the LIS – depends on the data (visual should go to PACs) – create the use cases to get this worked out
- @Kevin to reach out to DICOM WG 26 chairs for next joint meeting time(s)
- DPAT Feedback
- Ruben sent feedback
- Will update the introduction around sharing documents – more about making then available to be shared – will make sure that is clear throughout the document
- Reference to Suppl 122 would be good
- Patient identification – should it be pointing to PIX PDQ to ensure all identifiers are linked properly?
- Alessandro read it and will send Gianluca his comments
- Document is very good and addresses a common and interesting problem
- Defining all the steps of the workflow, but the workflow diagram is very complex
- This is not a new profile, but describes a way how existing profiles are used to solve this problem
- How would we test this – it is not a specific profile?
- Maybe focus on a part – like sharing of documents (case 1) – may be good to aim for
- Once incorporated, can publish the document – @Gianluca to email final document to Mary and cc the PaLM Co-Chairs
- Ruben sent feedback
- DPIO Update - Ruben
- Have been working on HL7 templates to share the DICOM information model – https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=b4492063e8&attid=0.1&permmsgid=msg-f:1731817586262568282&th=1808a6eb4cf46d5a&view=att&disp=safe&realattid=d2fdfc9b-691b-472e-aaba-9e22be081b2e
- How do we ensure the data in the DPIO and the DICOM meta data header for the DPIA elements – do not want duplication of the same data object between DIPA and DPIO
- Mandel wants to make sure that data is carried in a standard way; concern is there is duplication between DPIO and DPIA
- SET Update
- Nothing new
- CAT LAW testing
- Issues raised by Anne Gaelle about CAT LAW profile testing
- Main issue is that there are very few vendors to test this.
- LAW testing – would need to have analyzer manager
- Alessandro will make a list of vendors for the 2023 Connectathon
- Need to get more vendors to the IHE Connectathon
- Need to have a better strategy to reach out to potential testing vendors for Connectathon in 2023
- Connectathon results are only valid for about 2 years
- TO DO: Create a list of vendors and which profiles they could be testing – make that a google sheet and ask folks to enter their systems where they belong @Riki to prep the sheet
- Transfusion Medicine
- Nothing new and not for the next 3 months
- e-XHealth
- Not present
- CP for LAW around conformance length for container identifiers
- New GS1 specification will create 2D barcodes with length of about 60, but not exactly sure yet – there exists two Standards around that Topic:
- AUTO14 (Patient ID based)
- GS1 whatever (Tube ID based)
- Should we remove the conformance length altogether?
- Should this also apply to tray Identifier?
- Remove Table C.11.2 – must at least be listed as CLEN, instead of LEN
- Table 3.27.4.1.2.3-7 points to same element, but LEN is listed there as 50
- Remove duplicate information for sure
- @Ralf to send draft CP out and seek feedback via list on whether to remove CLEN altogether, or if not what length to set it to
- New GS1 specification will create 2D barcodes with length of about 60, but not exactly sure yet – there exists two Standards around that Topic:
- CRS4 is creating a Scientific School meeting will hold second part around interoperability – semantic topics – send to list so people are aware and can decide to attend https://www.crs4.it/interhealth2022