PaLM Conf Minutes 2021-April-14

Attendees

Name	Email
Francois Macary	Francois.macary@phast.fr
Rikki Merrick	rikimerrick@gmail.com
Alessandro Sulis	Allesandro.sulis@crs4.it
Dan Rutz	drutz@epic.com
Filip Migom	Filip.migom@mips.be
Raj Dash	r.dash@duke.edu
Megumi Kondo	megumi.kondo.sakura.japan@gmail.com
Jim Harrison	james.harrison@virginia.edu
Ralf Herzog	ralf.herzog@roche.com
JD Nolen	jdlnolen@gmail.com
Francesca Frexia	Francesca.frexia@crs4.it
Nick Haarselhorst	nick.haarselhorst@philips.com
Mary Kennedy	mkenned@cap.org
Gunter Haroske	haroske@icloud.com
David de Mena	david.mena@juntadeandalucia.es
Brian Bialecki	bbialecki@acr.org
Gianluca Pavan	Arsenal.IT
Alex Goel	agoel@cap.org
David Beckman	dBeckman@epic.com
Gregorio Canal	Arsenal.IT
Sujith Nair	snair@acr.org

Next meeting: May 12, 2021

• IHE F2F in Ghent Belgium – Tentative dates are September 8-10
  • Depending on COVID restrictions
  • Mary to send out Save the Date - Tentative
• Meeting request from Digital Pathology = ESDIP
  • Meet with DICOM on June 15th 3 – 5 PM Central European time
    • DPIA
    • DICOM annotation work
    • Mary will let Norman know and will send out announcement of meeting.
• SET:
  • Document was updated for review.
  • Track changes are on.
    • Added PRT segment
      • Different codes for PRT-2 and PRT-4, which are required fields based on the use case.
        • PRT-2 Action Code – lets the receiver know what to do with the data in the segment.
          • In v2.9 OO introduced the code SP for snapshot to indicate that we are sending just the most recent.
        • PRT-4 – Participation
          • This is user defined table, so we can add codes, when needed.
          • Can be human, organization or machine depending on the use case – applicable to ALL use cases MUST pick one of these at minimum.
          • What happens when a person uses 2 different devices to collect a specimen; what do we use? An example is a radiology technician that takes the image.
            • We are looking for the decision maker.
            • PRT segment can repeat in the base, so we could also capture the devices there.
        • Do we need codes for each of the use cases?
          • Yes – field is required.
            • Collector
            • Storage
            • Processing Entity
            • Could we come up with a single code to use across most use cases?
              • Maybe. Alessandro to review.
      • Chose the same PRT fields if possible. Can we change the use of PRT-7 and use either PRT-5, PRT-8 or PRT-10?
    • Added EVN segment.
    • Added Appendix for example messages.
    • Publication for comment is planned for end of May.
    • Next steps:
      • Alessandro will send link to updated document out by 4/16.
      • ALL review and send feedback to Alessandro by 4/30.
• Rad/Path Correlation Profile (Alex)
  • Completed first draft of five use cases.
  • Added concordance scoring.
  • Multi-disciplinary scoring and tumor board
  • Working on transactions and actor descriptions
    • These will need to be reviewed by the DCC if there are new actors and new transactions.
  • Creating samples of three FHIR resources to use:
    • Observation; Measure (definitional); MeasureReport (instance)
    • Would be good to have vendors give feedback.
      • Several vendors are attending project calls every other week.
      • There are not many products that do this, only papers / products.
      • What about Ibex?
        • They have a prostate concordance checker, so should reach out to them – Mary will send contact info to Alex.
  • Alex will update the wiki page and also create the project’s wiki page for the profile.
    • Should we include SDC here?
      • We should include reference to both APSR and SDC – hopefully it wouldn’t matter which “package” the observation resource that the measure is on comes from.
• Telemedicine
  • Will give their presentation on the next call.
• Next meeting May 12