PCCTech Minutes 2011 05 04

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Attendees - Tone Southerland, Audrey Dickerson, Philip De Palo, Lisa Nelson, Mary Jungers, Laura Heermann, Laura Bright, Anne Diamond.

Phone in attendees - Denise Downing, (Jean Millar & Mike McCoy - contacted for specific call in regarding CP questions.), Marcia Veenstra,

Interfacility Transfer

  • Questions re: location of tables in Vol 1 and Vol 2. Resolved. Document almost completed with just a few more formatting clean ups to do.

CP 88

  • Continued working through list.
  • Reviewed work completed in "off hours" with team.
  • Jean Millar and Mike McCoy contacted to help resolve an issue with LDS

CP APHP

  • Discussion related to Physical Examiniation and Vital Signs coded/not coded
  • table 6.3.1.a.4-1
  • have deleted the VS row and have added a reference to the physical exam row.
  • Need to return to this discussion.

Nursing Workflow

  • Off line discussions with ITI indicate work happening in that group to define a generic workflow.
  • Off line discussions with John Donnely resulted in looking at sources of nursing content...?
  • effort to not represent nursing as a silo, that only talks to nursing. want to show how nurses use the PPOC and eNS but also how they interact with the other profiles as well.
  • Question on if the work is to demonstrate the interactions as humans or as the systems.
  • Orders are written by advance practice nurses and send orders to Rx, Lab etc.

Nursing SubCommitte Future

  • initially started to get the interests of the Nursing Informatics commununity and allow them to rally around something that resonates with them. And to creat a place that was obvious for where nurses can participate
  • Audrey and Marcia have both had or will have job changes that will preclude them from being co-chairs
  • Not sure if there is someone else available to step into the role.

CP APHP

  • Revisited this CP to resolve the Physical Exam and Vital Sign issue
  • Created CP 110. Will complete recommendation included in CP 110 for resoultion.

Reconciliation

  • Review and editing of scenarios included.

Joint with ITI and QRPH

  • Discussion of LDR and multiple birth - how to represent multiple patients/subject participants
  • PCC created CP in November to address the issue of subject participants (CP-PCC-0064). Keith altered it to deal with multiple births.
  • Keith requested CP 64 be put on the agenda for tomorrow morning to be reviewed.
  • Discussion of how to adapt PIX or PAM to support notification of birth to public health
  • It was decided this is an orchestration of existing interoperability profiles. No need for new profiles, or for CPs to existing profiles.
  • Keith gave an update to the whole group on the R/R2 discussion from yesterday.