ITI CPs 2014-02-06

From IHE Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

ITI domain CPs for 2013-2014 are managed here: http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=ITI_Change_Proposals_2014

This page contains the agenda and minutes for the Feb 6, 2014 meeting.

Feb-6-2014

9-11am Central US

Agenda

(0) Current status spreadsheet: dated 2014-02-06 is here: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance-2014/CPs/Status/

(1) Review Incoming CPs ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance-2014/CPs/0_Incoming/

  • bill-vol1-doc-scr.doc
  • bill-vol1-folders.doc
  • cp-bill-availabilitystatus.doc
  • cp-bill-R-O-labeling.doc
  • cp-bill-R-O-labeling-classCode.doc
  • CP-ITI-Forcare-XDS-ChangeEnUSNotation.doc
  • CP-ITI-Forcare_TypoInSourcePatientInfo.doc
  • CP-ITI-LF-referenceIdList-Coding.doc
  • IHE-CP-ITI-XXX-IGibaud-FR-BasicSubsetOption.docx.doc
  • IHE-CP-ITI-XXX-IGibaud-FR-XDS-Metadata-archivingdate.docx.doc
  • IHE-CP-ITI-XXX-IGibaud-FR-ZBESegment.docx.doc

(2) Assigned CPs for discussion ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance-2014/CPs/1_Assigned/

  • CP-ITI-685 - (Christian Ohr with input from HPD implementers) - HPD Error Codes

(3) Old CPs - Motion to cancel these assigned CPs (deferred from 12/19 & 1/14 calls)

  • CP-ITI-496 (John M) - ATNA secure communications option – Motion to cancel - See rationale in minutes below.
  • CP-ITI-514 (John M) - Correct conflict in node authentication requirements - Motion to cancel - See rationale in minutes below.
  • CP-ITI-581 (John M) - Correct DSUB audit messages - Motion to cancel - - See rationale in minutes below.

Minutes

Attendees: Walco, Gila, Rob, Erik, Bill, Lynn, Carl Leitner

(0) Updated status spreadsheet: dated 2014-02-06 is here: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance-2014/CPs/Status/

(1) Review Incoming CPs ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance-2014/CPs/0_Incoming/

  • bill-vol1-doc-scr.doc - accepted - 741
  • bill-vol1-folders.doc - accepted & completed - 742
  • cp-bill-availabilitystatus.doc - accepted & completed - 743
  • cp-bill-R-O-labeling.doc - accepted - 744
  • cp-bill-R-O-labeling-classCode.doc - duplicate; withdrawn by bill
  • CP-ITI-Forcare_TypoInSourcePatientInfo.doc - accepted & completed - 745
  • CP-ITI-Forcare-XDS-ChangeEnUSNotation.doc - accepted - 746
  • CP-ITI-LF-referenceIdList-Coding.doc - accepted & completed - 747
  • IHE-CP-ITI-XXX-IGibaud-FR-BasicSubsetOption.docx.doc - postpone discussion until Feb 11 in Vienna with intent to find editor for HL7 / PAM CPs
  • IHE-CP-ITI-XXX-IGibaud-FR-XDS-Metadata-archivingdate.docx.doc - briefly reviewed; postpone full discussion until Feb 11 in Vienna
  • IHE-CP-ITI-XXX-IGibaud-FR-ZBESegment.docx.doc - postpone discussion until Feb 11 in Vienna with intent to find editor for HL7 / PAM CPs

(2) Assigned CPs for discussion ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance-2014/CPs/1_Assigned/

  • CP-ITI-685-03 - (Christian Ohr with input from HPD implementers) - HPD Error Codes - Since neither Karen, submitter of the CP, nor Christian who did the latest updates, was available to discuss the proposed changes, we deferred reviewing the changes to a future CP call. Lynn will add to agenda when both can attend.

(3) Old CPs - Motion to cancel these assigned CPs (deferred from 12/19 & 1/14 calls)

  • CP-ITI-496 (John M) - ATNA secure communications option
    • I am unsure that this is still wanted. It is also a very radical change that would affect “IHE Integration Statements”, be even worse for Gazelle. Given that this is many years old. I think it might be best to cancel it and see if it comes back up again. Reality is that today this is happening through non-stated means. Not a great idea, but reality. I think a solution that would be more accepted would be to write a new profile that was just the audit logging. I would rather see that submitted as a profile proposal. It might be one as small as CT. But it would likely get to what people want (audit without mandatory secure-communications). – Motion to cancel - Reviewed and accepted
  • CP-ITI-514 (John M) - Correct conflict in node authentication requirements
    • I think we solved this a long time ago with other broad ATNA rewrites. I certainly don’t think I could track down the meaning of the comments in the CP document. – Motion to cancel - Reviewed and accepted.
  • CP-ITI-581 (John M) - Correct DSUB audit messages
    • this seems to want us to take the current ITI-18 audit log messages and make them DSUB. But DSUB is not the same thing as ITI-18. I think the current DSUB audit messages are appropriate, and would not agree with the CP. Motion to cancel - Decision deferred until Vienna F2F. Walco will take the CP and this rationale back to Forcare for consideration.