Difference between revisions of "Talk:Item 11"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
4. Enter your name, because we would like to know the preferences of all who care to express this. | 4. Enter your name, because we would like to know the preferences of all who care to express this. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. No comments | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. Priority 2 | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. Very important to have an open process. It seems that the whole TF and CP process is not as open as it would seem and only the usual suspects know the ins and out of the process and can easily contribute to it. Having it documented publicly will be great to have more people able to participate. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 4. Anibal Jodorcovsky |
Revision as of 13:05, 14 December 2006
Analysis Questionnaire:
1. Do you have any comments on the topic: the results, workbreakdown, etc.
2. What should be the priority of this topic? Enter a 0, 1, 2 or 3, and 3 is the highest priority.
3. Why do you give this ranking?
4. Enter your name, because we would like to know the preferences of all who care to express this.
1. No comments
2. Priority 2
3. Very important to have an open process. It seems that the whole TF and CP process is not as open as it would seem and only the usual suspects know the ins and out of the process and can easily contribute to it. Having it documented publicly will be great to have more people able to participate.
4. Anibal Jodorcovsky