Difference between revisions of "Talk:Antepartum Summary Form C"
Tsoutherland (talk | contribs) |
Tsoutherland (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
TS: Has started an excel spreadsheet covering Form A, pulling out data elements, and identifying data types and LOINC codes. | TS: Has started an excel spreadsheet covering Form A, pulling out data elements, and identifying data types and LOINC codes. | ||
− | [[Media:APS_Profile_Field_Mapping.xls]] | + | [[Media:APS_Profile_Field_Mapping.xls|APS Spreadsheet - Forms A, B, C]] |
=== IP Issues === | === IP Issues === |
Revision as of 22:38, 26 March 2007
- Forms (A, B, C) can be covered by extending Medical Summary
- Form D can be covered by XD*-LAB
- Form E can be covered by an Education Plan
- Form F & G are simply extensions of C.
- Discharge Summary back to Ob.
- Post Partum Form
The following terminologies were found by GE in their review of this data Media:GECodes.xls
March 23 Telcon
- Attending
- Anne Diamond - ACOG, Dr. Al Strunk, Tone Southerland - Digichart, James Scroggs - ACOG, Larry McKnight - Siemens, Keith W. Boone - GE Healthcare
Progress
TS: Has started an excel spreadsheet covering Form A, pulling out data elements, and identifying data types and LOINC codes.
APS Spreadsheet - Forms A, B, C
IP Issues
LM: Does AGOC License the form? AS: ACOG does license the form itself. It is a non-exclusive license and has no cost associated with it.
KB: We should incorporate a statement about this in the profile. Would ACOG draft some text that we could include in the profile?
JS/AS: Yes.
Status
LM: Wiki updates were made recently.
LM: I've divided volume 2 into four parts: A and B; C, F and G; D; and E, is that OK?
Yes
LM: Do we have a volunteer to make sure the mood of the profile is rewrittent to be declaritive?
AD: Yes, we can do that.
LM: We need an Open Issues Log...
KB: Put that on the discussion page.
LM: So delete it ...
KB: Yes
LM: On the Actors and Transactions section, do we need this?
KB: I would ignore that for now. In the supplements, this is probably needed, but in the overall document it isn't.
LM: Does Radiology have a mechanism to deal with this?
KB: Probably not, since this seems to be a content profile issue.
LM: When Radiology included PIR, how did they handle this? Did they repeat pre-existing information or refer to existing material?
KB: I don't know.
LM: Can you take that as a to-do? To figure out our approach to this.
KB: Yes.
LM: Do you have any opinions about how to write the folder strategy?
KB: One of the things I'd like to do is to define the vocabulary used to identify the folder. This should be an update to the Bindings Section,
LM: Would this be the same for XD*
KB: I believe they all have folders.
We probably want to ask LOINC code for a new code for a SET of records that covers Antepartum Care, since these documents are not explicitely "LABOR AND DELIVERY RECORDS".
Claims Attachment ballot has listed in it a number of very usefull LOINC codes here: See Clinical Reports