Difference between revisions of "Talk:Antepartum Summary Form C"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 16: Line 16:
 
TS: Has started an excel spreadsheet covering Form A, pulling out data elements, and identifying data types and LOINC codes.
 
TS: Has started an excel spreadsheet covering Form A, pulling out data elements, and identifying data types and LOINC codes.
  
[[Media:APS_Profile_Field_Mapping.xls]]
+
[[Media:APS_Profile_Field_Mapping.xls|APS Spreadsheet - Forms A, B, C]]
  
 
=== IP Issues ===
 
=== IP Issues ===

Revision as of 22:38, 26 March 2007

  1. Forms (A, B, C) can be covered by extending Medical Summary
  2. Form D can be covered by XD*-LAB
  3. Form E can be covered by an Education Plan
  4. Form F & G are simply extensions of C.
  5. Discharge Summary back to Ob.
  6. Post Partum Form

See example ACOG forms


The following terminologies were found by GE in their review of this data Media:GECodes.xls

March 23 Telcon

Attending
Anne Diamond - ACOG, Dr. Al Strunk, Tone Southerland - Digichart, James Scroggs - ACOG, Larry McKnight - Siemens, Keith W. Boone - GE Healthcare

Progress

TS: Has started an excel spreadsheet covering Form A, pulling out data elements, and identifying data types and LOINC codes.

APS Spreadsheet - Forms A, B, C

IP Issues

LM: Does AGOC License the form? AS: ACOG does license the form itself. It is a non-exclusive license and has no cost associated with it.

KB: We should incorporate a statement about this in the profile. Would ACOG draft some text that we could include in the profile?

JS/AS: Yes.

Status

LM: Wiki updates were made recently.

LM: I've divided volume 2 into four parts: A and B; C, F and G; D; and E, is that OK?

Yes

LM: Do we have a volunteer to make sure the mood of the profile is rewrittent to be declaritive?

AD: Yes, we can do that.

LM: We need an Open Issues Log...

KB: Put that on the discussion page.

LM: So delete it ...

KB: Yes

LM: On the Actors and Transactions section, do we need this?

KB: I would ignore that for now. In the supplements, this is probably needed, but in the overall document it isn't.

LM: Does Radiology have a mechanism to deal with this?

KB: Probably not, since this seems to be a content profile issue.

LM: When Radiology included PIR, how did they handle this? Did they repeat pre-existing information or refer to existing material?

KB: I don't know.

LM: Can you take that as a to-do? To figure out our approach to this.

KB: Yes.

LM: Do you have any opinions about how to write the folder strategy?

KB: One of the things I'd like to do is to define the vocabulary used to identify the folder. This should be an update to the Bindings Section,

LM: Would this be the same for XD*

KB: I believe they all have folders.

We probably want to ask LOINC code for a new code for a SET of records that covers Antepartum Care, since these documents are not explicitely "LABOR AND DELIVERY RECORDS".

Claims Attachment ballot has listed in it a number of very usefull LOINC codes here: See Clinical Reports