Difference between revisions of "Quality Roadmap"
Lavernep624 (talk | contribs) |
Lavernep624 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Retrospective review of outcomes based on utilization of evolving technologies | |Retrospective review of outcomes based on utilization of evolving technologies | ||
− | | | + | | |
|NOPR (PET registry) ACRIN/CMS/Brown Univ. | |NOPR (PET registry) ACRIN/CMS/Brown Univ. | ||
| | | | ||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Real-time documentation of continuing education and certification (point-of-care CME) | |Real-time documentation of continuing education and certification (point-of-care CME) | ||
− | | | + | | |
|ACCME standards for award of physician CME | |ACCME standards for award of physician CME | ||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Patient assessment to prevent adverse events | |Patient assessment to prevent adverse events | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | + | | | |
|- | |- | ||
|Adverse event reporting | |Adverse event reporting | ||
− | | | + | | |
|Expected AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Adverse Events | |Expected AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Adverse Events | ||
Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
Structural measures | Structural measures | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Measure Reporting | |Measure Reporting | ||
Line 124: | Line 125: | ||
*Core Measure Reporting (AHA?/JCAHO?) | *Core Measure Reporting (AHA?/JCAHO?) | ||
− | | | + | | |
|AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Quality (including patient identity management) | |AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Quality (including patient identity management) | ||
Line 137: | Line 138: | ||
State/provincial/regional quality measures | State/provincial/regional quality measures | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Data registries | |Data registries | ||
Line 145: | Line 147: | ||
*Intermediary point to aggregate date to share with CMS, other destination agencies | *Intermediary point to aggregate date to share with CMS, other destination agencies | ||
*Gathering quality data (peer review, patient safety, protocols in place and physician use of protocols) from various care settings | *Gathering quality data (peer review, patient safety, protocols in place and physician use of protocols) from various care settings | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
Disease management registries: STS, ACC NCDR, Tumor Registry, Trauma Registry, HDC Registry (HRSA) | Disease management registries: STS, ACC NCDR, Tumor Registry, Trauma Registry, HDC Registry (HRSA) | ||
Line 152: | Line 154: | ||
National Practitioner Database | National Practitioner Database | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|Standardized reporting: develop standard formats for reports (eg, Echo, Cath Lab, Nuc Med) to ensure report has elements needed to collect quality data | |Standardized reporting: develop standard formats for reports (eg, Echo, Cath Lab, Nuc Med) to ensure report has elements needed to collect quality data | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | + | | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|Consumer aspects of quality reporting | |Consumer aspects of quality reporting | ||
Line 174: | Line 176: | ||
*Informed patient consent | *Informed patient consent | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
NQF Consumer Council | NQF Consumer Council | ||
Line 183: | Line 185: | ||
CMS Hospital Compare and Nursing Home Compare | CMS Hospital Compare and Nursing Home Compare | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|Harmonization with other initiatives | |Harmonization with other initiatives | ||
− | |||
* NCVHS hearings in July | * NCVHS hearings in July | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- |
Revision as of 12:42, 6 November 2007
Scope and Current Work
<This section is optional>
<Briefly (one or two lines) describe the Committee's scope and the current activities.>
Current Meetings
Date | Time | Location | Topic | Agenda | Minutes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
recent | |||||
2007.11.05 | 1000-1730 | Chicago | Profile Selection and other topics | ||
2007.11.06 | 8300-1730 | Chicago | Profile Selection and other topics |
Legend
Priority:
Prerequisites: List of applicable standards Coordination: Other domains to coordinate efforts with. |
Strategy:
Year: Earliest Opportunity given prerequisites, priority and skills. |
Roadmap
Topic | Pri | Standards/Prerequesites | Coord | Strategy | Year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peer Review
Peer review and feedback |
ACR RadPeer program
AMA/ABMS program using performance measures for peer review of physician hospital groups |
||||
Decision support for ordering and procedure approvals | Massachusetts program based on ACR appropriateness criteria (consult with Dr. Keith Dreyer/MGH)
Generate justification data when needed (through use of QED?) AQA principles for developing measures of appropriateness ACC/AHA Appropriateness Criteria, decision support tools |
||||
Retrospective review of outcomes based on utilization of evolving technologies | NOPR (PET registry) ACRIN/CMS/Brown Univ. | ||||
Radiation dose
|
|||||
Real-time documentation of continuing education and certification (point-of-care CME) | ACCME standards for award of physician CME
ABMS MOC requirements Medbiquitous/SCORM |
||||
Patient assessment to prevent adverse events | |||||
Adverse event reporting
|
Expected AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Adverse Events
Joint commission requirements (per state) CDC has voluntary and mandatory reporting for some diseases Care coordination efforts across disciplines - NQF, CMS, Joint Commission Adverse Event Reporting Structural measures |
||||
Measure Reporting
|
AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Quality (including patient identity management)
Measures developers (eg, AMA/PCPI, NCQA, ACC/AHA, JCAHO), endorsers, testers and implementers (eg, NQF, AQA) Measuring health delivery disparities across demographic segments (eg, race, gender, socioeconomic status) - AHA Health Research and Educational Trust, HRSA Care coordination efforts across disciplines - NQF, CMS Structural measures State/provincial/regional quality measures |
||||
Data registries
|
Disease management registries: STS, ACC NCDR, Tumor Registry, Trauma Registry, HDC Registry (HRSA) Immunization registries National Practitioner Database |
||||
Standardized reporting: develop standard formats for reports (eg, Echo, Cath Lab, Nuc Med) to ensure report has elements needed to collect quality data | |||||
Consumer aspects of quality reporting
|
NQF Consumer Council AARP OASIS Data for Home Care (CMS) CMS Hospital Compare and Nursing Home Compare |
||||
Harmonization with other initiatives
|