Difference between revisions of "Quality Roadmap"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 66: Line 66:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Retrospective review of outcomes based on utilization of evolving technologies
 
|Retrospective review of outcomes based on utilization of evolving technologies
|
+
| 
 
|NOPR (PET registry) ACRIN/CMS/Brown Univ.  
 
|NOPR (PET registry) ACRIN/CMS/Brown Univ.  
 
|   
 
|   
Line 84: Line 84:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Real-time documentation of continuing education and certification (point-of-care CME)
 
|Real-time documentation of continuing education and certification (point-of-care CME)
|
+
| 
 
|ACCME standards for award of physician CME
 
|ACCME standards for award of physician CME
  
Line 95: Line 95:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Patient assessment to prevent adverse events
 
|Patient assessment to prevent adverse events
|
+
| 
|
+
| 
|
+
| 
|
+
| 
 
+
| 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Adverse event reporting
 
|Adverse event reporting
  
  
|
+
| 
 
|Expected AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Adverse Events
 
|Expected AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Adverse Events
  
Line 114: Line 114:
  
 
Structural measures  
 
Structural measures  
|
+
| 
|
+
| 
 +
| 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Measure Reporting
 
|Measure Reporting
Line 124: Line 125:
  
 
*Core Measure Reporting (AHA?/JCAHO?)
 
*Core Measure Reporting (AHA?/JCAHO?)
|
+
| 
 
|AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Quality (including patient identity management)
 
|AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Quality (including patient identity management)
  
Line 137: Line 138:
 
State/provincial/regional quality measures
 
State/provincial/regional quality measures
  
|
+
| 
|
+
| 
 +
| 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Data registries
 
|Data registries
Line 145: Line 147:
 
*Intermediary point to aggregate date to share with CMS, other destination agencies
 
*Intermediary point to aggregate date to share with CMS, other destination agencies
 
*Gathering quality data (peer review, patient safety, protocols in place and physician use of protocols) from various care settings  
 
*Gathering quality data (peer review, patient safety, protocols in place and physician use of protocols) from various care settings  
|
+
| 
|
+
| 
 
Disease management registries: STS, ACC NCDR, Tumor Registry, Trauma Registry, HDC Registry (HRSA)
 
Disease management registries: STS, ACC NCDR, Tumor Registry, Trauma Registry, HDC Registry (HRSA)
  
Line 152: Line 154:
  
 
National Practitioner Database
 
National Practitioner Database
|
+
| 
|
+
| 
|
+
| 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Standardized reporting: develop standard formats for reports (eg, Echo, Cath Lab, Nuc Med) to ensure report has elements needed to collect quality data  
 
|Standardized reporting: develop standard formats for reports (eg, Echo, Cath Lab, Nuc Med) to ensure report has elements needed to collect quality data  
  
|
+
| 
|
+
| 
|
+
| 
 
+
| 
|
+
| 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Consumer aspects of quality reporting
 
|Consumer aspects of quality reporting
Line 174: Line 176:
  
 
*Informed patient consent
 
*Informed patient consent
|
+
| 
|
+
| 
 
NQF Consumer Council
 
NQF Consumer Council
  
Line 183: Line 185:
  
 
CMS Hospital Compare and Nursing Home Compare
 
CMS Hospital Compare and Nursing Home Compare
|
+
| 
|
+
| 
|
+
| 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Harmonization with other initiatives
 
|Harmonization with other initiatives
 
  
 
* NCVHS hearings in July
 
* NCVHS hearings in July
 +
| 
 +
| 
 +
| 
 +
| 
 +
| 
 +
|-

Revision as of 12:42, 6 November 2007

Scope and Current Work

<This section is optional>

<Briefly (one or two lines) describe the Committee's scope and the current activities.>


Current Meetings

Date Time Location Topic Agenda Minutes
recent          
2007.11.05 1000-1730 Chicago Profile Selection and other topics    
2007.11.06 8300-1730 Chicago Profile Selection and other topics    

Legend

Priority:
H
Essential Now
M
Essential Future
L
Nice to Have

Prerequisites: List of applicable standards

Coordination: Other domains to coordinate efforts with.

Strategy:
CP
Develop Content Profile
IP
Develop Integration Profile
Res
Research Applicable Standards
Promote
Promote Applicable Standards Development Efforts

Year: Earliest Opportunity given prerequisites, priority and skills.

Roadmap

Topic Pri Standards/Prerequesites Coord Strategy Year
Peer Review

Peer review and feedback

  ACR RadPeer program

AMA/ABMS program using performance measures for peer review of physician hospital groups

     
Decision support for ordering and procedure approvals   Massachusetts program based on ACR appropriateness criteria (consult with Dr. Keith Dreyer/MGH)

Generate justification data when needed (through use of QED?)

AQA principles for developing measures of appropriateness

ACC/AHA Appropriateness Criteria, decision support tools

     
Retrospective review of outcomes based on utilization of evolving technologies   NOPR (PET registry) ACRIN/CMS/Brown Univ.      
Radiation dose
  • Appropriate aggregation of dose information
  • Minimization of dose to target patient population
         
Real-time documentation of continuing education and certification (point-of-care CME)   ACCME standards for award of physician CME

ABMS MOC requirements

Medbiquitous/SCORM

     
Patient assessment to prevent adverse events          
Adverse event reporting


  Expected AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Adverse Events

Joint commission requirements (per state)

CDC has voluntary and mandatory reporting for some diseases

Care coordination efforts across disciplines - NQF, CMS, Joint Commission Adverse Event Reporting

Structural measures

     
Measure Reporting
  • Institutional (process)
  • Physician (performance)
  • Core Measure Reporting (AHA?/JCAHO?)
  AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Quality (including patient identity management)

Measures developers (eg, AMA/PCPI, NCQA, ACC/AHA, JCAHO), endorsers, testers and implementers (eg, NQF, AQA)

Measuring health delivery disparities across demographic segments (eg, race, gender, socioeconomic status) - AHA Health Research and Educational Trust, HRSA

Care coordination efforts across disciplines - NQF, CMS

Structural measures

State/provincial/regional quality measures

     
Data registries
  • Procedure-specific datasets (eg, ACC Carotid Artery Stent Registry)
  • Intermediary point to aggregate date to share with CMS, other destination agencies
  • Gathering quality data (peer review, patient safety, protocols in place and physician use of protocols) from various care settings
   

Disease management registries: STS, ACC NCDR, Tumor Registry, Trauma Registry, HDC Registry (HRSA)

Immunization registries

National Practitioner Database

     
Standardized reporting: develop standard formats for reports (eg, Echo, Cath Lab, Nuc Med) to ensure report has elements needed to collect quality data          
Consumer aspects of quality reporting
  • PHR as record of repeat procedures
  • Consumer view of provider quality information
  • Patient self management
  • Home health monitoring
  • Informed patient consent
   

NQF Consumer Council

AARP

OASIS Data for Home Care (CMS)

CMS Hospital Compare and Nursing Home Compare

     
Harmonization with other initiatives
  • NCVHS hearings in July