Difference between revisions of "Performance Measurement Data Element Structured for EHR Extraction"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
FEisenberg (talk | contribs) |
FEisenberg (talk | contribs) |
||
| (28 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''White paper: Performance Measurement Data Element Structured for EHR Extraction''' | '''White paper: Performance Measurement Data Element Structured for EHR Extraction''' | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/ | + | * Tuesday, July 22, comment resolution was completed. Detailed comments are located at: |
| + | ** Comments and resolution: [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/2008_2009_YR_2/Technical/ihe_qrph_public_comment_July_2008%255B1%255D%5B1%5D.doc Comment resolution] | ||
| + | ** Clean version: [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/2008_2009_YR_2/Technical/CLEAN%20IHE_QRPH_Whitepaper_Perfomance_Measure_Data_Element_Structured_for_EHR_Extraction_2008-07-22_Comment_resolution.doc White Paper] | ||
| + | ** Track changes version: [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/2008_2009_YR_2/Technical/COMMENT%20IHE_QRPH_Whitepaper_Perfomance_Measure_Data_Element_Structured_for_EHR_Extraction_2008-07-22_Comment_resolution.doc Track Changes Version] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Discussion on various sections and comments, tasks== | ||
| + | * 18 June 2008 [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/2008_2009_YR_2/Technical/Public%20Comment/IHE_QRPH_Whitepaper_Perfomance_Measure_Data_Element_Structured_for_EHR_Extraction_2008-06-1108-06-06.pdf Version 1.0 for Public Comment] | ||
| + | * 14 May 2008 [[QRPH_Technical_Committee_Minutes_2008-05-14]] | ||
| + | * 1 May 2008 [[QRPH_Technical_Committee_Minutes_2008-05-01]] | ||
| + | * 30 Apr 2008 [[Agenda / Minutes of 10:00 - 11:00 AM (CDT US) White Paper Update Call]] | ||
| + | * 23 Apr 2008 Discussion: [[Potential Coordination with work of the Collaborative for Performance Measure Integration with EHRS]] | ||
==Previous work (versions)== | ==Previous work (versions)== | ||
| − | * [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/ | + | * [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/2008_2009_YR_2/Technical/2_JUN_2008_IHE_QRPH_White_Paper_version15.doc June 2, 2008] |
| − | * [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/ | + | * [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/2008_2009_YR_2/Technical/30_5_2008_IHE_QRPH_White_Paper_version1%5B1%5D.doc May 30, 2008] |
| + | * [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/2008_2009_YR_2/Technical/27_5_2008_IHE_QRPH_White_Paper_version1%5B1%5D.doc May 27, 2008] | ||
| + | * [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/2008_2009_YR_2/Technical/21_5_2008_IHE_QRPH_White_Paper_version1%5B1%5D.doc May 21, 2008] | ||
| + | [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/2008_2009_YR_2/Technical/IHE_QRPH_White_Paper_Performance_Measure_Data_Element_Structured_for_EHR_Extraction_2008_04_26.doc April 26, 2008] | ||
==Related materials== | ==Related materials== | ||
| − | *[[Sharing Value Sets | + | *ITI [[Sharing Value Sets]] Profile |
*[http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/472/referenceguide.pdf Collaborative for Performance Measure Integration with EHR Systems XML Schema Reference Guide] | *[http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/472/referenceguide.pdf Collaborative for Performance Measure Integration with EHR Systems XML Schema Reference Guide] | ||
| Line 48: | Line 61: | ||
***[ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/Technical_Comittee/2008/AMI-3%20Data%20Elements%20-%20v2%204%20Craig.doc Data Elements Required for AMI-3 ACEI / ARB Prescribed at Discharge for Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients] | ***[ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/Technical_Comittee/2008/AMI-3%20Data%20Elements%20-%20v2%204%20Craig.doc Data Elements Required for AMI-3 ACEI / ARB Prescribed at Discharge for Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients] | ||
***[ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/Technical_Comittee/2008/ACEI%20ARB%20Measures%202-4.xls Selected items comparing existing specifications to expected EHR content for AMI 3 Measure] | ***[ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/Technical_Comittee/2008/ACEI%20ARB%20Measures%202-4.xls Selected items comparing existing specifications to expected EHR content for AMI 3 Measure] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 11:37, 28 July 2008
Current work
White paper: Performance Measurement Data Element Structured for EHR Extraction
- Tuesday, July 22, comment resolution was completed. Detailed comments are located at:
- Comments and resolution: Comment resolution
- Clean version: White Paper
- Track changes version: Track Changes Version
Discussion on various sections and comments, tasks
- 18 June 2008 Version 1.0 for Public Comment
- 14 May 2008 QRPH_Technical_Committee_Minutes_2008-05-14
- 1 May 2008 QRPH_Technical_Committee_Minutes_2008-05-01
- 30 Apr 2008 Agenda / Minutes of 10:00 - 11:00 AM (CDT US) White Paper Update Call
- 23 Apr 2008 Discussion: Potential Coordination with work of the Collaborative for Performance Measure Integration with EHRS
Previous work (versions)
Related materials
- ITI Sharing Value Sets Profile
- Collaborative for Performance Measure Integration with EHR Systems XML Schema Reference Guide
Comments from Vassil Peytchev on Collaborative for Performance Measure Integration with EHR Systems
- The goal of the Collaborative is to create a standardized way to communicate performance measures using structured, encoded performance measure information, which can be also used within EHR applications.
There are three levels of performance measures representation:
- Performance measure description
- Performance measure template
- Performance measure machine processable information
This holds a resemblance to the levels of a CDA document:
- Level 1 - Unstructured text
- Level 2 - Structured text
- Level 3 - Discrete data
The CDA is patient-centric, so it is not directly applicable here.
- However, HL7 just published a draft for the SDA (Structured Document Architecture) which is not patient-centric, and can be directly applicable for this use. The Structured Document committee of HL7 is also working on a Quality Reporting Document Architecture (QRDA).
- These intersecting activities strongly suggest that collaboration is the best way forward given the emphasis on HL7 CDA and CCD-based (and therefore HL7 V3 based) specifications throughout the US (HISTP, CCHIT), and internationally (IHE).
The Collaborative can consider the following notes about the Performance Measure Integration specifications:
- The use of HL7 V3 data types when applicable. This will make the XML representation (of codes in particular)uniform across a variety of data exchange requirements.
- Make use of the IHE processes. The IHE SVS profile, for example, will use a very similar structure to the CodeGroup and Code structure to represent contents of general value sets (using HL7 v3 datatypes).
- Consider the use of the HL7 SDA as a basis for a performance measure description. This will allow for a future expandability of the format.
- Reconsider the use of XML in the template for logical expressions.
A transformation of the XML content to a more readable form would be preferred.
- Measure specific information for two exemplars: