Difference between revisions of "PCCPlan Minutes 2013 10 09"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
   
 
   
 
Should we consider other things that need reconciliation? -  
 
Should we consider other things that need reconciliation? -  
1. Advance directives
+
**1. Advance directives
2. Providers and Pharmacy
+
**2. Providers and Pharmacy
3. Family members and Contacts
+
**3. Family members and Contacts
4. Patient preferences
+
**4. Patient preferences
5. Coded Functional Status
+
**5. Coded Functional Status
6. Medical Devices (would this go in the "intervention"?)
+
**6. Medical Devices (would this go in the "intervention"?)
7. Review of Systems
+
**7. Review of Systems
8. Discharge Instructions (hospital)  (would this go in the "intervention"?)
+
**8. Discharge Instructions (hospital)  (would this go in the "intervention"?)
9. Instructions Section  (would this go in the "intervention"?)
+
**9. Instructions Section  (would this go in the "intervention"?)
10. Discharge Diagnosis
+
**10. Discharge Diagnosis
11. Hospital Discharge Results Summary
+
**11. Hospital Discharge Results Summary
12. Diet and Nutrition  (would this go in the "intervention"?)
+
**12. Diet and Nutrition  (would this go in the "intervention"?)
13. Social History?
+
**13. Social History?
 
   
 
   
 
Some things have privacy and security risks.  
 
Some things have privacy and security risks.  
 
   
 
   
 
Reconciling Vitals and Results as another profile is discouraged because results is done by other means and vitals are typically collected and utilized locally - this was discussed as part of the SMART project (Per George C.)
 
Reconciling Vitals and Results as another profile is discouraged because results is done by other means and vitals are typically collected and utilized locally - this was discussed as part of the SMART project (Per George C.)
 
  
 
===Patient Visit View Summary===
 
===Patient Visit View Summary===
 
* George Cole
 
* George Cole

Revision as of 11:00, 9 October 2013

Attendees: Laura Heermann Langford, Laura Bright, Charles Rica, Bruno Grossin, Denise Downing

Call in Attendees: Emma Jones, George Cole, Dave Stumpf, Lisa Nelson,


Reconciliation of Interventions, Goals and Care Providers

  • Emma Jones
  • Discussion:

What do we mean by "intervention"? Need to define this in the detailed proposal.

Should we consider other things that need reconciliation? -

    • 1. Advance directives
    • 2. Providers and Pharmacy
    • 3. Family members and Contacts
    • 4. Patient preferences
    • 5. Coded Functional Status
    • 6. Medical Devices (would this go in the "intervention"?)
    • 7. Review of Systems
    • 8. Discharge Instructions (hospital) (would this go in the "intervention"?)
    • 9. Instructions Section (would this go in the "intervention"?)
    • 10. Discharge Diagnosis
    • 11. Hospital Discharge Results Summary
    • 12. Diet and Nutrition (would this go in the "intervention"?)
    • 13. Social History?

Some things have privacy and security risks.

Reconciling Vitals and Results as another profile is discouraged because results is done by other means and vitals are typically collected and utilized locally - this was discussed as part of the SMART project (Per George C.)

Patient Visit View Summary

  • George Cole