Difference between revisions of "ITI Tech 2006 2007 Meetings"

Revision as of 07:31, 14 December 2006

Meeting December 5-6, 2006

Agenda

Review New Proposals from Planning Committee
- Cross Community location service (Karen W.) (Profile)
- XUA (John M.) (Profile)
- MTOM (Vassil/Roberto) (Profile)
- Non-Patient Document Sharing (???) (Profile)
- Web Services specialized bindings (Vassil) (Appendix(s))
  - PIX/PDQ V3
  - EMR Query
- Configuration Management (Rob) (White Paper)
- Aggregate Data (Charles, Floyd) (White Paper/Profile???)
Carry-over from last season
- RFD (George) - PCC work dependent on new ITI Profile Proposal 'Investigator Identity and Authentication' which did not get forwarded to tech from planning
- PIX/PDQ V3 (???)
  - Web service bindings (see above)
  - Other????
Cardiology/Patient Care Devices Presentation
- Tue 1-2
- IHE Cardiology and IHE PCD Profiles presentation - requesting ITI vendor implementations
- Feedback on the IDCO Profile (use HLv2 or XML payload?)
Discuss use of new IHE wiki
Discuss CPs

Schedule

Day	Time	Topic
Tues	930	Organize/Breakfast/wiki discussion
	1000	XUA (John M)
	1100	Non-Patient Doc Sharing (??)
	1200	Lunch
	100	Cardiology/Patient Care Devices (?)
	200	Aggregate Data (Charles)
	300	XC Location Service (Karen)
	400	Web Services Bindings (Vassil)
	430	CP Discussion
	530	Adjourn
Wed	830	Breakfast
	900	RFD (George)
	930	PIX/PDQ V3 (????)
	1000	MTOM (Vassil/Roberto)
	1100	Config Mgmt White Paper (Rob)
	1200	Lunch
	100	Overflow
	200	Review Plans/Assignments
	230	Adjourn

Change Proposal TCON November 15, 2006

Minutes

Attendees Rob Horn - AGFA Karen Witting - IBM Bill Majurski – NIST Glen Deen – IBM Yongjian Bao – GE Josh – Misys Mark Sinke – ForeCare Vassil Peytchev - Epic John Moerke – GE Laurie Williams – IBM George Cole - Allscripts

pixpdq_170_09

item #4 became new CP 204

5 no change - added example
6 fixed

ask for response from Isabelle

xds_164_05- atna and xds - rob, mark

Emmanuel offered the following:

1) We effectively decided not to create an "import" event on a consumer side for a retrieve document, because the nature of the protocol (HTTP Get) making probable that the retrieve itself is directly performed by the Web browser. When we evolve this protocol (WS...) it must be reconsidered. 2) The name of the Studies / DICOM Studies is not consistent for Import/Export events. We have definitly to tell to people what is the corresponding "study" for the XDS/XDR/XDM profiles. I would recommend that it is the XDSSubmissionSet (referenced by its uniqueId) for XDS Register, XDS/XDR Provide&Register and XDM Distribute, and the XDSDocumentEntry for the XDS Retrieve. 3) Similarly, we have to precise the ParticipantObjectID in the Query event to be set to the UUID of the type of XDS object queried (document, submission set or folder) 4) There are some typos in the CP. For example you did not end the Query section, or errors in parentheses.

Long discussion – Mark and Rob to merge their independent writings.

xds_136_02 - John M - No need to discuss

xds_144 - long URI - need status on ballot #3 from LaVerne - not present on call

Action items

CP 164 includes codes that need to be registered. Who does this?

Mark and Rob submitted updated at the same time. They are working to reconcile. Schedule next review.

Many questions have floated about this season regarding audit. Suggest creating an Implementers Guide on generating audit messages.

Ask for review and comments from Isabelle on CP 170

Long URI CP in Ballot #3 - Get in touch with LaVerne

Next call noon (central) on Dec 19

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 === Schedule ===
-{| style="width:95%" border="1" cellpadding="1"
+{| style="width:95%"
 ! Day
 ! Time