Participants:
Ben Levy, Chris Melo, John Moehrke, Lynn Felhofer, Mike Henderson, Spencer LaGesse, Steve Nichols, Sarah Bell, Luke Duncan, Sylvie Colas, Tone Southerland, Mark Woodruff, Mick Talley, Jenny Thompson, Charles Parisot
Minutes:
Goals: MHDS and SVCM to TI. More public comments for SNIF. Status of IUA
Reviewed public comments for SVCM.
Updated GitHub with latest changes and comments spreadsheet
8:00 am–9:00 am
John
MHDS - Public Comment Review
Minutes:
Reviewed public comments and updated document.
Will continue in afternoon session.
12:00 pm–1:00 pm
John
MHDS
Minutes:
Reviewed remaining comments for MHDS
Will prepare final version for voting tomorrow.
1:00 pm–2:00 pm
Luke
SVCM
Minutes:
Reviewed remaining comments for SVCM
Reviewed FSH/SUSHI Implementation Guide for SVCM
Not much benefit for FSH as of now. Will continue with standard FHIR resources.
Tuesday, 5th May, 2020
Day 2: Tuesday, 5 May, 2020
Time
Virtual
(CDT, UTC−05:00)
Leads
Activity
Notes
7:00 am–8:00 am
**Cancelled**
**Cancelled**
Participants:
John Moehrke, Sarah Bell, Steve Nichols, Chris Melo, Lynn Felhofer, Sylvie Colas, Spencer LaGesse, Vassil Peytchev, Ben Levy, Charles Parisot
Minutes:
8:00 am–8:30 am
Steve
SNIF - Public Comment Review
Minutes:
No public comments so far
Has been reviewed with some stakeholders
will continue to solicit feedback
Open items will be edited based on comments
Meeting scheduled May 21
8:30 am–9:00 am
Luke / John / Lynn
Finalize status, tasks, and timeline for TF and TI
Minutes:
Reviewed current CP integration
Discussed using GitHub for CP submission
Will discuss further later in the week
9:00 am–10:00 am
Luke / John / Lynn
Vote on TI for MHDS and SVCM
Minutes:
Voting
MHDS published to TI
John, motioned, Steve seconded. No objections, No abstentions, Motion Passed
SVCM published to TI
Luke motioned, Ben seconded. No objections, Charles abstains, Motion Passed
SNIF published
Steve motioned, Charles seconded. No objections, No abstentions, Motion Passed
Discussed and updated agenda for the rest of the week
Participants:
John Moehrke, Lynn Felhofer, Oliver Egger, Spencer LaGesse, Sylvie Colas, Sarah Bell, Ben Levy, Steve Nichols, Luke Duncan
Minutes:
In the morning the ITI Tech committee will be selecting our new work items for this next quarter.
a. What is the ITI Tech capacity now?
b. What are we doing about IUA work item?
c. Evaluation of the potential new work items for their expected workload (sizing)
d. Tech prioritization adjustments based on ability to fulfil the new work item
e. Select best fit of new work items into our capacity
f. Inform ITI Planning of decision
The IT Planning committee has evaluated in April the following 5 potential new work items with the following priorities (proposal documents https://github.com/IHE/IT-Infrastructure/tree/master/Proposals)
Update HIE Whitepaper to include MHD
Update publication of final text volumes using html rather than PDF
Update MHD from DocumentManifest to List(s)
Federate MHDS using FHIR including Patient and User federation
Provider Directory alignment (mCSD) with Argonaut, Sequoa, and DirectTrust
Notes
Capac Planning
Continuing work
IUA -- likely with Walco and/or Martin (Swiss)
SNIF -- possible public comment response next face-to-face, with need to react
normal CP load
Capacity available
??? What level of engagement will the committee members be able to apply ??? Given COVID and day-job expectations in the coming months
??? Depend on who is the author of the work items.
??? capability to do same amount of work when meetings are not face-to-face (aka virtual face-to-face)
Likely available capacity is smaller than normal
Likely available
two medium to three medium
one medium and one large
??? Highly dependent on capacity available question to be asked later this morning when more people are on the call ???
Evaluation of potentials
Update HIE Whitepaper to include MHD
overall creative work is small
will likely be medium size because of commmittee overread need
likely need to have reading sessions as the overreading is not going to be easy, and will find good improvements
John is funded thru ONC/IHE-USA to be the editor
medium mostly because of committee time committment, not because of editor load
Consensus size is Medium
Update publication of final text volumes using html rather than PDF
Committee review time may be signficant - medium
Editor effort is going to be signficant - medium to large
depending on tooling and automation
Effort involving writing procedure for long term maintenance
backlog (future task) management to keep from exploding scope
John is funded thru ONC/IHE-USA
Consensus size is Large
Intend to pick a load we are comfortable with, and evaluate at next face-to-face what we do next quarter (continue vs abandon)
Update MHD from DocumentManifest to List(s)
amount of work is clear
exacting editing does require exacting committee reviewing
Timing relative to IHE Connectathon
Timing relative to FHIR R5 release. If done prior to R5 release would mean MHD needs to revise twice (R4 and then R5)
Possible to accelerate editing to produce Public Comment this week, might produce TI revision end of 2020 year. (Presumes first complete draft is produced wednesday night)
Slower effort puts public comment in summer, with TI revision in Q1 2021
Consensus size is Small
Possible and desireable in Q2 2020 to write up a plan for transition away from DocumentManifest, so that the community looking to start use of MHD(s) is aware of the change pending. -- Planning Committee outreach activity
Federate MHDS using FHIR including Patient and User federation
Even though Charles is not on the call, we all know that he would insist on XCA support
Consensus size is Medium
If MUST support XCA then size is Large
Provider Directory alignment (mCSD) with Argonaut, Sequoa, and DirectTrust, DiVinci, CommonWell, CMS, MiHIN, US-Core and VhDir
depends highly on stake holder participation
can not be successful at Tech Committee without stakeholder engagement
Consensus is we can't succeed, so not selected
Decision on new work items
Defer decision till 1:00 Central time, post noon session on html publication progress.