Difference between revisions of "Domain Coord - Future Agenda Topics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
** Pointer to Domain Timeline and current meeting schedule | ** Pointer to Domain Timeline and current meeting schedule | ||
** Pointer to policies, procedures and processes | ** Pointer to policies, procedures and processes | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Updated Email Ballots explanation page at [[Email_Ballots]] | ||
== "Parking Lot" == | == "Parking Lot" == |
Revision as of 07:40, 29 April 2008
Feel free to add proposed agenda items here.
Urgent: For Next Meeting
Try to indicate why it's urgent
Near Term
- Proposed update to the supplement template to clarify sections
- Issues on keeping the roster on the wiki
- Possibility of modification (e.g. modification of the ITI roster to include voting rights).
- Roster format and depth needed in term of history.
- Proposed Attendance Clarification
- Radiology would like to state that missing a multi-day face to face counts as missing one meeting but attending a multi-day face to face counts as one for each day.
- (i.e. if you arrive without voting priveleges you get to vote starting the second day; if you have a travel conflict and can't make a three day face-to-face, you don't necessarily lose your voting privileges unless you'd missed the two meetings before that)
- If most other co-chairs agree, lets add it to the Voting Privileges page, if not, I'll add it to a Radiology procedures page.
- How to make support material for developers easily available
- Specialized part of the wiki ordered by domain and profile? (e.g. the Implementation section of the Wiki)
- Non-participating Domains - need action plan to pull missing co-chairs into this Cmte
- May be able to springboard from Domain Applications
- E.g. "Welcome to IHE" email to cochairs of Approved domains outlining responsibilities, linkups
- Template for Domain Reports to the Board
- What should the board hear about each domain
- Draft a template and an example.
- Short, informative
- New Committee Member Welcoming Process
- Form letter
- How to get on the mailing list
- How the Committee Page works
- Pointer to Domain Timeline and current meeting schedule
- Pointer to policies, procedures and processes
- Updated Email Ballots explanation page at Email_Ballots
"Parking Lot"
Review these from time to time for activation
- IHE Review Committees - Revisit after "HL7 Review Taskforce" pilot has made some progress
- Previously tried to do a single Review Cmte and the volume is intractable
- Consider Standard oriented cross-domain review committees
- E.g. IHE HL7 Review Cmte, IHE DICOM Review Cmte, IHE WebServices Review Cmte, IHE CDA Review Cmte
- Basically for any standard that is used across more than one domain
- Any transaction created in any Domain using a certain standard, must be sent to the relevant Review Cmte.
- Transaction authors must participate in the review
Completed
If you think we've covered it, but aren't comfortable deleting it yet (it remains in History), then move it here
- Board Representative Selection for Domains
- Deadlines in March
- Learnings from domain representative elections:
- Lack of update-to-date roster (see ITI Plan Roster which lists Keith Boone as a representative of Dictophone) means that it is not clear what organizations are eligible. Led to 40-50% ineligible votes in ITI, PCC, PCD and QRPH. All future votes should only be conducted with an up-to-date roster available to all participants. Roster should be referenced in every email ballot.
- Should elections for board representative count toward maintaining or acquiring voting rights? Alternatively, is the fact that an organizations submitted a vote (not the contents of a vote, just the submission) be public or private? Should ineligible votes lead to eligible voting in the next meeting/vote? I propose that every email ballot explain the handling of ineligible votes.
- When an organizations submits a vote that is not counted should that organization be notified?
- HL7 2.x Versioning (delegated to HL7 Review Taskforce)
- Strategies
- Backward compatibilities or not
- ...