DBT FT Evaluation
Revision as of 06:02, 4 May 2016 by AntjeSchroeder (talk | contribs)
Proposal
The Digital Breast Tomosynthesis profile has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Antje Schroeder) Per the Final Text Process, Items in blue text below warrant Committee discussion.
Technical Committee Checklist
- Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
- [Antje] There are no open DBT CPs
- Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
- [Antje] There are no DBT related CPs in DICOM
- Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
- [Antje] Yes
- Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
- The first open issue can be closed, the supplement is aligned with DICOM CP 1342
- Open issue 2 (Should Evidence Creators particiapte in the For Processing Breast Projection X-Ray Images Option) is still open, but I would recommend to close with any further action, since no feedback was received regarding this topic
- Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?
- [Antje] After checking with Lynn Felhofer and David Clunie, no issues have been raised at the Connectathon.
- Gather feedback from implementers via a formal questionnaire to Connectathon participants
- [Antje] See above
- Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
- [Antje] See above
Technical Committee Consensus
Planning Committee Checklist
The Planning Committee votes on the Tech Cmte proposal to Final Text the supplement.
- Put Final Text Decision on the planning committee agenda
- Consider doing this a couple months before new TF version will be released so it can be incorporated.
- It's helpful to assign an advocate for the supplement at this time to check/prepare the evidence for the upcoming checklist rather than go hunting for it during the meeting
- Run down the following checklist for each proposed supplement
- Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?
- Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?
- Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
- Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
- Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
- Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
- (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)
- Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?
- Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page overview of the profile
- Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion)
- Record checklist findings and conclusions of the debate in your meeting minutes
- Hold and record formal vote
- Communicate results to TC