Rad Plan Minutes 2010-10-27
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Attendees
- Alex Tzannes, Aware
- David Mendelson, MD
- Charles Kahn, MD
- Curtis Langlotz, MD
- Chris Lindop
- Kinson Ho, Agfa
- James Cialdea, Aware
- Lynn Felhofer, MIR
- Niki Wirsz, Siemens
- Jonathon Dreyer, Nuance
- Chris Click, Nuance
- Kevin O'Donnell, Toshiba
- Ron Cowan, Merge
- Cor Loef, Philips
- Daniel Rubin, MD
- Chris Carr, RSNA
- Nichole Drye-Mayo
Minutes
- Reviewed profiles in preparation for selecting package of work items for development in 2011
- Allows exchange of templates in vendor-independent format, encouraging adoption of structured templates to generate higher quality, more uniform reports
- Would support RSNA Reporting Committee and RadLex work in defining templates and controlled vocabulary for radiology reporting
- Dr. Langlotz willing to lead editorial team and will bring additional resources to work
- Work is likely to be significant for all the diagnostic specialties; radiology will lead but also communicate with cardiology, eye care, lab, etc.
- Uses DICOM standards to manage image sets across sites, including synchronization and acknowledgments, delete and replace functions
- Addresses problems encountered in areas where distributed PACS has been deployed, notably in Canadian Health System
- Agfa willing to lead team; will get help from DICOM experts, including Fred Behlen
- Uses emerging DICOM UPS worklist standard to streamline reporting and potentially post-processing
- Depends on emerging DICOM standard and SIIM TRIP work outcomes
- Proposed Slates
Proposals under Consideration | Editor | Effort | Tag |
---|---|---|---|
Management of Radiology Report Templates - Detailed Proposal | C. Langlotz | ||
- - address exchange of templates only | 20% | A1 | |
- - also address discovery/monitoring (Query, Pub/Sub, etc) | +20% | A2 | |
Imaging Object Quality Control and Maintenance - Detailed Proposal | K. Ho | 35% | B |
Reporting Workflow Revision - Detailed Proposal | K. O'Donnell | 40% | C |
Cross-Community Access - Images (XCA-I) - Detailed Proposal | C. Lindop | 30% | D |
Rad TF Maintenance 2010-11 | CoChairs | 20% | E |
The following "slates of work" were proposed, listing a group of proposals and the estimated Tech Cmte bandwith. Slates significantly over 100% must indicate a ("below the line" proposal) which is to be dropped if the Tech Cmte runs into bandwidth problems.
Slate 1 - A1 B D E = 105%
Slate 2 - A1 (A2) B D E = 125%
Slate 3 - B D E = 85%
Slate 4 - (A1) B C E = 115%
Slate 5 - A1 C (D) E = 110%
Slate 6 - A1 A2 B E = 95%
Vote Talley - Slate 1 was selected with 5 votes
- Slate 3 - 1 vote
- Slate 5 - 1 vote
- Slate 6 - 2 votes