Rad Tech Agenda 2024-02-05-09

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quick Links

Join Zoom Meeting https://rsna-org.zoom.us/j/88293289078?pwd=EN6TpivcdbsTxW5s1aJBe3fu5pAk2u.1

Meeting ID: 882 9328 9078 Passcode: 810631

Monday, February 5, 2024

Tuesday, February 6, 2024

Wednesday, February 7, 2024

  • A1: 8:45am-9:00am Administrative Time
  • S1: 9:00am-10:30am: Imaging Diagnostic Report (IDR)
  • S2: 10:45am-12:15pm: Maintenance
  • A2: 1:00pm-1:30pm: Reject Analysis (RAM)
  • S3: 1:30pm-2:45pm: Imaging Diagnostic Report (IDR)
  • C1: 3:00pm-4:00pm: Clinical Consult
  • S5: 4:00pm-4:45pm: Imaging Diagnostic Report (IDR)
  • A3: 4:45pm-5:00pm: Administrative Time

Thursday, February 8, 2024

  • A1: 8:45am-9:00am Administrative Time
  • S1: 9:00am-10:30am: Imaging Diagnostic Report (IDR)
  • S2: 10:45am-12:15pm: Maintenance-
    • XCA CP on XCA-I titled: WADO-RS as an optional transaction between Initiating GW and Responding GW Actors of XCA-I
  • A2: 1:00pm-1:30pm: Administrative Time
  • S3: 1:30pm-3:00pm: Reject Analysis (RAM)
  • S4: 3:15-4:45pm Imaging Diagnostic Report (IDR)
  • A3: 4:45pm-5:00pm: Administrative Time

Friday, February 9, 2024

  • A1: 8:30am-9:00am Administrative Time - 2024-25 Cycle planning
  • S1: 9:00am-10:30am Checkpoint assessments; Tcon scheduling
  • S2: 10:45am-12:15pm Maintenance
  • A2: 12:30pm - Open time

Maintenance topics for the week

Link to RAD CP Tracking sheet

Link to RAD TF Maintenance folder in google drive

Maintenance topics:

  • Review / update Assessment of RAD profiles for promotion or deprecation
    • Review Antje's evaluation forms in this folder
      • MAWF deprecation evaluation
      • CXCAD deprecation evaluation
      • SMI deprecation evaluation
      • XCA CP on XCA-I titled: WADO-RS as an optional transaction between Initiating GW and Responding GW Actors of XCA-I
  • CP-related discussion topics for committee deliberation
    • CP-RAD-513-02 SWF.b: Clarify Intermittently Modality behavior in RAD-10 Storage Commitment (Steve, Sean) - Reworked as discussed. @Sean let me know if this is OK.
    • CP-RAD-519 BIR updates for Final Text (Steve) Reduced content items discussed during call in June. Added stuff we talked about to the rationale. Did I miss anything?
    • CP-RAD-517 NMI Cardiac Option - update to include support of PS (Steve) - Kevin asked that I elaborate on the option descriptions. I expanded them a bit, but they're not very wordy . Let me know your thoughts
  • Other CPs ready for committee review:
    • CP-RAD-463 - Add RDSR Display option in REM (Kevin)
    • CP-RAD-479-01 - RAD-60 - update reason codes reference to DICOM (Lynn)
    • CP-RAD-496-01 - Missing arrow in in SWF.b actor/transaction diagram (Lynn)
    • CP-RAD-478-01 - Remove out-of-date references to DICOM and supplement (Lynn)
    • CP-RAD-515-01 - Vol 2x: Fully integrate SWF.b into Appendix D (Lynn) -- cmte input needed
    • CP-RAD-483-00 - Deprecate PWF transactions (Lynn) -- get go-ahead from RAD Tech to do this
    • CP-RAD-305-02 - Revise profile dependencies (grouping) in Vol 1) (Lynn) -- cmte input needed; do it, or kill it...
    • CP-RAD-436-02 - Fix inconsistencies in IOCM actor / transaction and grouping requirements (Lynn) -- cmte input needed
    • CP-RAD-410-03 - XCA-I is out of date for Async (Lynn)
    • CP-RAD-491-01 - Code Mapping WP update (Lynn)
  • Review / update Top Ten CP list
    • Finalize content and timing of next CP ballot

Checkpoints

Putting these in the Agenda since there is no minutes page yet

Profile Name: Reject Analysis

  • Did we line-by-line the entire document

Yes. (although some edits to be completed)

  • How ready is it to go out for PC: Completely, Almost, Soonish, Hmmm

Almost+

  • Which open issues are risky, and why

Aren't really risky. Need some modality quality code feedback.

  • Are all open issues phrased to solicit the needed information to close them?

Yes.

  • Which use cases need more input

Might get comments on analysis, but seems OK.

  • Which issues from the Kickoff Closing Assessment are still unresolved

None

  • What significant debates in PC-prep were not anticipated in the Kickoff

IOCM Overlap (Add question about overlap with other profiles?)

  • Review ALL "uncertainty points" in the evaluation. Are all now resolved?

Mostly yes. Have Open Issues for the remaining. None have severe impact

  • Review ALL "complexity points" in the evaluation. Did each get appropriate text coverage/resolution?

Ooops. Missed one. Rest got covered.

  • Review the "effort points" in the evaluation. Still seems right? Need more?

Seems right.

  • How does the scope feel in terms of being a useful chunk of work? (Needs more? Just right? More than enough?)

Just right.

  • How is the work fitting in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?)

Fitting.

  • Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose?

Mostly. Usual random extra details.

  • Looking forward, if you had to reduce scope to hit TI, what would you drop

Unreject handling. Maybe drop the non radiography and do later as CPs.

  • Have the promised resources manifested

Mostly yes.

  • What vendors are engaged (for each actor)

Reporter: Canon, Siemens, (Philips), GE IM/IA: Visage, (Canon), (Siemens), Philips, (GE) Analyzer: (3rd party), (Canon)

  • When will we have sample data/objects

Should come up with a plan. They're pretty simple. Discuss with Lynn.

  • Who should specifically be targeted for Public Comment feedback

AAPM WG, DICOM WG, Modality Vendors (for codes)

  • Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the PC meeting (See "PC Prep Meeting" above), if not what was the gap

Mostly? Didn't get it posted early. Could have been more complete.

  • Was the profile where it needed to be at the end of the PC meeting, if not what was the gap

Mostly. Have some "edited as discussed" material to cover.

  • How many tcons would you like between now and PC Publication

None. Will ping by email if anything awkward comes up.

  • Do you need any tcons before TI Prep Meeting

Probably not. Don't anticipate any big issues.

Profile Name: Imaging Diagnostic Report

  • Did we line-by-line the entire document
  • How ready is it to go out for PC: Completely, Almost, Soonish, Hmmm
  • Which open issues are risky, and why
  • Are all open issues phrased to solicit the needed information to close them?
  • Which use cases need more input
  • Which issues from the Kickoff Closing Assessment are still unresolved
  • What significant debates in PC-prep were not anticipated in the Kickoff
  • Review ALL "uncertainty points" in the evaluation. Are all now resolved?
  • Review ALL "complexity points" in the evaluation. Did each get appropriate text coverage/resolution?
  • Review the "effort points" in the evaluation. Still seems right? Need more?
  • How does the scope feel in terms of being a useful chunk of work? (Needs more? Just right? More than enough?)
  • How is the work fitting in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?)
  • Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose?
  • Looking forward, if you had to reduce scope to hit TI, what would you drop
  • Have the promised resources manifested
  • What vendors are engaged (for each actor)
  • When will we have sample data/objects
  • Who should specifically be targeted for Public Comment feedback
  • Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the PC meeting (See "PC Prep Meeting" above), if not what was the gap
  • Was the profile where it needed to be at the end of the PC meeting, if not what was the gap
  • How many tcons would you like between now and PC Publication
  • Do you need any tcons before TI Prep Meeting
Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Rad_Tech_Agenda_2024-02-05-09&oldid=131940"