EduCom Minutes 2019-05-03
Revision as of 08:38, 3 May 2019 by Juergenbrandstaetter (talk | contribs) (Created page with "= Agenda = == Welcome == * Participants :* Jürgen Brandstätter :* Alexander Ihls :* Jamie Dulkowski * Review and Approve Agenda :* Approved == Exam status update == * Re...")
Agenda
Welcome
- Participants
- Jürgen Brandstätter
- Alexander Ihls
- Jamie Dulkowski
- Review and Approve Agenda
- Approved
Exam status update
- Report on operation, # of exam takers, issues, etc. (Jürgen, Werner)
- So far one exam passed: Charles Parisot is the first :) (consent given for publication in these minutes)
- Charles's feedback:
- Registration for the exam
- Process is complex and has gaps, several different websites (GASQ, ProctorU, Exam site) involved
- Exam itself
- Timing: 30min for Charles out of 1 hour -> seems to be ok
- Out of 40 questions:
- 14 questions needed deeper analysis
- Question/answers were unclear, ambiguous or mulitple answers could work or answers were not clear
- Comments were given in the exam as comments
- Only 4 out of the 5 sections of the Syllabus were covered by the exam questions
- Alexander: Questions for all sections are available, must be a randomizing or structuring issue in the exam
- Issue resolution
- Issue received about "Pin", which is asked, but not given. Reason was bad wording in GASQ registration email, reported to be fixed now
- Fixed
- Issue not fixed yet: There are things to do on the GASQ website, which have to be done first (registering and paying) in order to do the exam -> instructions are not complete
- Action item: GASQ to review the instructions by following the instructions (starting from the IHE website) and remove all gaps (Werner)
- Refer to Charles's emails from April 30, 23:25 and the ones resent on May 3rd, 15:25 and May 3rd, 15:28
- Feedback given on exam (see above)
- Action item: Process feedback on exam (Werner, Exam question group)
- Feedback loop
- A feedback look is required to debug the exam
- Some free exam slots can be given to certain experts for sitting the exam and give feedback
Logo
- FTP Logo
- Formal decision on logo
- Logo colors
- Decision: Based on the offline voting between blue and red, the final logo is the "blue" one
- Action item: Finalize logo (web version, print version, etc.) (Chris)
Processes Document
- Status and review of additions
Accreditation of training providers
- Status and next steps
- Interested:
- University of Applied Sciences, Austria
- ZTG, Germany
Any other business
Next call
- tbd