EduCom Minutes 2019-05-03

From IHE Wiki
Revision as of 08:38, 3 May 2019 by Juergenbrandstaetter (talk | contribs) (Created page with "= Agenda = == Welcome == * Participants :* Jürgen Brandstätter :* Alexander Ihls :* Jamie Dulkowski * Review and Approve Agenda :* Approved == Exam status update == * Re...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Agenda

Welcome

  • Participants
  • Jürgen Brandstätter
  • Alexander Ihls
  • Jamie Dulkowski
  • Review and Approve Agenda
  • Approved


Exam status update

  • Report on operation, # of exam takers, issues, etc. (Jürgen, Werner)
  • So far one exam passed: Charles Parisot is the first :) (consent given for publication in these minutes)
  • Charles's feedback:
  • Registration for the exam
  • Process is complex and has gaps, several different websites (GASQ, ProctorU, Exam site) involved
  • Exam itself
  • Timing: 30min for Charles out of 1 hour -> seems to be ok
  • Out of 40 questions:
  • 14 questions needed deeper analysis
  • Question/answers were unclear, ambiguous or mulitple answers could work or answers were not clear
  • Comments were given in the exam as comments
  • Only 4 out of the 5 sections of the Syllabus were covered by the exam questions
  • Alexander: Questions for all sections are available, must be a randomizing or structuring issue in the exam
  • Issue resolution
  • Issue received about "Pin", which is asked, but not given. Reason was bad wording in GASQ registration email, reported to be fixed now
  • Fixed
  • Issue not fixed yet: There are things to do on the GASQ website, which have to be done first (registering and paying) in order to do the exam -> instructions are not complete
  • Action item: GASQ to review the instructions by following the instructions (starting from the IHE website) and remove all gaps (Werner)
  • Refer to Charles's emails from April 30, 23:25 and the ones resent on May 3rd, 15:25 and May 3rd, 15:28
  • Feedback given on exam (see above)
  • Action item: Process feedback on exam (Werner, Exam question group)
  • Feedback loop
  • A feedback look is required to debug the exam
  • Some free exam slots can be given to certain experts for sitting the exam and give feedback


  • Logo colors
  • Decision: Based on the offline voting between blue and red, the final logo is the "blue" one
  • Action item: Finalize logo (web version, print version, etc.) (Chris)


Processes Document

  • Status and review of additions


Accreditation of training providers

  • Status and next steps
  • Interested:
  • University of Applied Sciences, Austria
  • ZTG, Germany


Any other business

Next call

  • tbd


IHE Education Committee