New Directions Process
Background
In 2006 several profiles developed by the ITI committee missed the deadline for official connectathon testing. Since work on these profiles was of great interest and time critical for a community of interest they went forward within the "New Directions" section of HIMSS, a new area which has proved very valuable. The RFD (Request Form for Display) and PIX/PDQ V3 (HL7 V3 version of PIX/PDQ profile) profiles will be demonstrated as part of the New Directions section of HIMSS. For both of these initiatives a project manager was supplied by the community of interest (versus the normal process in which IHE supplies the project manager) and informal testing was supported during connectathon by the project manager. The project manager also organized and managed the demonstration of that profile within the New Directions section of the HIMSS Interoperability Showcase.
This process has proven very useful in cases where a profile is time critical but there may be a problem with perhaps the underlying standards, resource availability within IHE or a lack of real world experience with the standards being used or the problem being solved. In this case one might consider the effort a 2 or more year effort, where the first year is a prototype year, and the second year becomes a true trial implementation version.
Proposal
The proposal is to make the informal process used during 2006 a formal process during the 2007 year. This process would not look identical to the process used in 2006, but would be designed to accomodate the needs seen during that year. The goal would be that a "New Directions Profile" be developed which would not have formal connectathon testing but would have a demonstration as part of a New Directions section of HIMSS. It is expected that any New Directions Profile would become a Trial Implementation Supplement in the following year, unless a significant technial or political problem suggested otherwise. Vendors would be educated about this new type of profile and warned that there may be significant technical changes prior to its release as a trial implementation. The project manager would take on the effort of identifying interested parties interested in implementing an intermediate profile of this type. It must be made clear to vendors that a new directions profile is expected to have significant technical changes made in a future year and a vendor, other than the community of interest for the area, may want to delay implementation or may want to implement a prototype only version for participating in demonstration.
Process
Step 1: Each domain would identify proposals which hold the potential for being a new directions profile. The requirements for this would be: a) there is a community of interest which will provide a project manager, manage a separate TCON/development track, and coordinate with the committee co-chairs b) this profile is not ready for the official process due to standards immaturity or lack of extensive experience in the area. Or any other reason.
Step 2: There is an consensus of the domain's planning & technical committess that the identified profile is an appropriate fit for a New Directions profile.
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6
Step 7
Step 8
Step 9