PCD Connectathon&Showcase 2012-08-14 Webex

From IHE Wiki
Revision as of 13:06, 21 August 2012 by Efurst (talk | contribs) (Discussion)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

PCD Connectathon & Showcase Meeting 2012-2013 Cycle, August 14, 2012

Action Items

You can find the Action Items at PCD-Connectathon&Showcase-ActionItemsCycle7-2012-2013


Agenda

You can find the agenda at http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_Connectathon%26Showcase_WG_2012-13

This meeting was recorded

Participants

Chris Courville, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, John Garguilo, Nitin Kunte, Richard Lane, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, John Zaleski, Manny Furst

Discussion

Item3 Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Manny
Status/Discussion:
No changes were made to the agenda.
Discussion Summary from last meetings were reviewed and approved PCD Connectathon&Showcase 2012-07-31 Webex

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

2 2013 N A Connectathon
- Manny
Status/Discussion:

ADT: Nitin expressed their need to assure that the ADT systems support them. Manny responded that PCD will need to specify ADT and other non-PCD system requirements for them and others. We will need to address this later in the registration cycle.

RDQ: John Zaleski will develop a database and anticipates having a responding system. The database will be posted to the ftp site (folder defined). He anticipates a csv file. A significant question is how to query the database. The database should be available early in October. John asked John Garguilo if the NIST tool will be capable of responding to the query. John Garguilo agreed, suggesting that for this first round NIST would translate the .csv file to .xml. John G asked if the responder could be an administrative system similar to those in other domains. NIST hasn’t done a great deal with this, but it would be useful to look at this. John G indicated that early October is pushing the limit, and John Z offered to provide the table in mid-September. John G indicated that a query/response test will have more steps than the usual PCD profile test, especially when the NIST tool is the responding system. E.g., at the Connectathon how will we best verify that the system that obtains the data actually received the data. He recommended that inspection testing is the appropriate approach this first year.

Other: Manny indicated links added to the Wiki page and noted that participants will need to check for updates on IHE Connectathon and HIMSS Showcase pages periodically.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 2013 Showcase
- Manny
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):


Return to main WG page which has links to individual meeting pages

Return to main PCD Connectathon/Showcase WG page: PCD_Connectathon&Showcase_WG_2012-13

PCD Home