PaLM Conf Minutes 2017-Feb-15
Back to IHE Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (PaLM) Domain
Back to IHE Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (PaLM)Technical Committee Page
Recording
The recording for this meeting can be downloaded here:
Attendees
| Francois Macary, Co-Chair | Phast |
| Raj Dash, Co-Chair | CAP |
| Riki Merrick, Co-Chair | APHL |
| Carolyn Knapik | CAP, secretariat |
| Mary Kennedy | CAP, secretariat |
| Alessandro Sulis | CRS4 |
| Christopher Kraft | Sunquest |
| Dan Rutz | Epic |
| Daniel Mancusi | Systelab |
| David de Mena | SAS |
| Filip Migom | MIPS |
| Francesca Frexia | CRS4 |
| Francesca Vanzo | Arsenal IT |
| James Harrison | CAP |
| JD Nolen | Cerner |
| Jessica Poisson | Duke |
| Jurgen De Decker | MIPS |
| Kai Heitmann | Art Decor |
| Ken Takahashi | JAHIS |
| Laurent Lardin | bioMerieux |
| Megumi Kondo | Sakura Finetek Japan |
| Yoshitake Fujisaku | |
| Ian Gabriel |
Minutes
Agenda:
1st hour
- New Blood Bank Proposal (Raj)
- Comments by reviewers of the example of APSR 2.0 (François + the reviewers)
- Digital pathology in Venice, preparation, help needed? (Francesca Vanzo)
2nd hour:
- SET update- (Alessandro)
- LCC review - detailed (Riki, Jim)
- LSH update - (John) – cancel and reschedule
New blood bank proposal (attach document here)
- Please share this document for future work with vendors that operate in this realm – and see, if we can get more folks on. Please send vendor contact information to Carolyn.
- Francois will forward to French Haemonetics vendor
- JD can reach out to Mediware
- Might want to reach out to the vendors blood product administration tooling
- Dan has monthly meetings with Mediware and Haemonetics
APSR examples review comments
- Not many reviewed, so 2nd hour topics move forward in first hour
- Raj provided breast biopsy report to Gunther and Francois
- Francois is sharing the rendered form of the report to PaLM Google Group– see file name: APSR_Raj_breastCancer_Case1gen_CP_161217.xml
- Francois to resend the request for review, with the CDA doc attached, and the list of items to focus on.
- Check the entry of the last section = procedure step section
- Raj: will non-standard text affect interoperability of the data? Text section that is human readable is not standardized yet
- The system will review the entry part of the section:
- Location in SCT
- performer = surgeon
- product = specimen and ID
- entity = tissue
- EntryRelationship to participant additive = Stain
- What does tube mean under manufacturedMaterial? – will need to ask Gunther
- How to best check on the right codes are used in this example – can look up the OID in the HL7 OID registry, but they also should be listed in the specification here: http://wiki.hl7.de/index.php?title=IG:Pathologiebefund%235_Namespaces_and_Vocabularies%20
- Needs to be added to the Value set
- Vol 1 describes the use case, Vol 3 has the reference vocabulary along with the template definitions
- DUE FOR NEXT CALL = March 8