Card Tech Minutes 2016.12.07-08: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:The harmonizes with the ACC Registry, and industry approaches of one way to submit data to any registry. One consideration is the planning for bandwidth to complete the work.This will further encourage the standardization of terminology. It make help the NCDR to have a recommendation from IHE regarding this process. The Cath PCI 5.0 Update, from 4.4, is vital to make this profile a success as vendors will not spend the time and money to implement a version that has a brief lifespan. | :The harmonizes with the ACC Registry, and industry approaches of one way to submit data to any registry. One consideration is the planning for bandwidth to complete the work.This will further encourage the standardization of terminology. It make help the NCDR to have a recommendation from IHE regarding this process. The Cath PCI 5.0 Update, from 4.4, is vital to make this profile a success as vendors will not spend the time and money to implement a version that has a brief lifespan. | ||
:Any ACC comment from would need to be provided by the end of Jan 2017 for inclusion in this release. | :Any ACC comment from would need to be provided by the end of Jan 2017 for inclusion in this release. | ||
:AbdulMalik shared a presentation regarding the work process for Consolidating the RCS-C and RCS-EP. Including description of the primary template containment structures and codes. Oozeki-san shared the IHE-Japan experience and how the national extensions differ from the CV submission process. | :AbdulMalik shared a presentation regarding the work process for Consolidating the RCS-C and RCS-EP. Including description of the primary template containment structures and codes. Oozeki-san shared the IHE-Japan experience and how the national extensions differ from the CV registry submission process. | ||
:'''Consolidated CRC, Part 1''' | |||
:Chris Melo presented the CIRC Profile from 2011 and reviewed the details regarding the three base use cases and areas to be considered for update in 2016, and the document level data elements. | |||
Revision as of 10:43, 7 December 2016
Attendees
- Chris Melo, Philips, Co-Chair
- Nick Gawrit, Heartbase, Co-Chair
- Paul Dow, ACC, Secretary
- Antje Schroeder, Healthineers
- Dan Murphy, Epic
- Rebecca Baker, ACC
- Nakano Shinichi, Toshiba
- Takeshi Oozeki, Toshba
- Charles Thomas, University of Washington
- James Tcheng MD, Duke University
- AbdulMalik Shakir, Hi3 Solutions
Minutes
Wednesday, December 7, 2016
- Consolidated Cardiology Report Content Profile Planning
- Four profiles were initially submitted for consideration in the 2016-2017 cycle. As the process developed, two profiles were removed, and the remaining two profiles, CRC and CIRC, were considered to blend into one structured reporting profile to address diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The implementation of the separate profiles has been limited, so the thought was to make the profile more applicable to a wider audience. This would also leverage the work done with EPRC-IE which strengthens all of the profiles, and will harmonize all three profiles in the long run.
- Project Goals: 1. Update CRC to ver 2.1 2. CIRC update to CRC and EPRC and base it on CCDA templates
- The harmonizes with the ACC Registry, and industry approaches of one way to submit data to any registry. One consideration is the planning for bandwidth to complete the work.This will further encourage the standardization of terminology. It make help the NCDR to have a recommendation from IHE regarding this process. The Cath PCI 5.0 Update, from 4.4, is vital to make this profile a success as vendors will not spend the time and money to implement a version that has a brief lifespan.
- Any ACC comment from would need to be provided by the end of Jan 2017 for inclusion in this release.
- AbdulMalik shared a presentation regarding the work process for Consolidating the RCS-C and RCS-EP. Including description of the primary template containment structures and codes. Oozeki-san shared the IHE-Japan experience and how the national extensions differ from the CV registry submission process.
- Consolidated CRC, Part 1
- Chris Melo presented the CIRC Profile from 2011 and reviewed the details regarding the three base use cases and areas to be considered for update in 2016, and the document level data elements.