Evaluation of Invoke Image Display: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Newer edit →
Kho (talk | contribs)
611 edits
Created page with "Profile wiki page: Invoke Image Display Answers to the following checklist for IID ** Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"? There is one outstanding CP (..."
 
Kho (talk | contribs)
611 edits
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Profile wiki page: [[Invoke Image Display]]
Profile wiki page: [[Invoke Image Display]]
== Technical Committee Evaluation ==


Answers to the following checklist for IID
Answers to the following checklist for IID
** Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
* Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
 
There is one outstanding CP (CP-RAD-349) that suggests adding "close" and "logout" commands in the API.


There is one outstanding CP (CP-RAD-349) that suggests adding "close" and "logout" commands in the API
See [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TmSwnn4AIiXqFLc_AtzP0dNd9LUWnA-ZcCjBMKpLzp4/edit#gid=0 CP Tracking Spreadsheet]


** Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
* Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?


Yes
Yes


** Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
* Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?


Yes
Yes
   
   
** Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
* Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?


Yes
Yes


** Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?  
* Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?  


Yes
Yes


*** Gather feedback from implementers via a [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Connectathon/IHE%20Vendor%20Questionnaire%20V0.4.doc formal questionnaire to Connectathon participants]
* Gather feedback from implementers via a [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Connectathon/IHE%20Vendor%20Questionnaire%20V0.4.doc formal questionnaire to Connectathon participants]
** Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
 
Informal feedback gathering only
 
* Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
 
Yes.
 
* Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion)
* Record checklist findings and debate conclusion
 
 
== Planning Committee Consensus ==
 
* Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?


Yes. Tested in Bochum 2016, NA 2016, NA 2015, Vienna 2014
Yes. Tested in Bochum 2016, NA 2016, NA 2015, Vienna 2014
Line 29: Line 46:
[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1d2A_iT-xvkvXhmpxH3CLNbDpWi6D36ebgH7VPMtZXKM/edit#gid=1702388284 Connectathon test results summary]
[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1d2A_iT-xvkvXhmpxH3CLNbDpWi6D36ebgH7VPMtZXKM/edit#gid=1702388284 Connectathon test results summary]


* Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion)
* Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?
* Record checklist findings and debate conclusion
 
Yes.
 
* Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
 
Yes.
 
* Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
 
No option defined.
 
* Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
 
No.
 
* Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
 
Yes. HTTP(S) URL is widely used.
 
* (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)
 
Yes.
 
* Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?
 
One outstanding CP (CP-RAD-349)
 
* Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page [[Profiles|overview of the profile]]
 
David has already created one [[Invoke Image Display]]

Revision as of 06:17, 4 May 2016

Profile wiki page: Invoke Image Display

Technical Committee Evaluation

Answers to the following checklist for IID

  • Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?

There is one outstanding CP (CP-RAD-349) that suggests adding "close" and "logout" commands in the API.

See CP Tracking Spreadsheet

  • Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?

Yes

  • Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?

Yes

  • Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?

Yes

  • Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?

Yes

Informal feedback gathering only

  • Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?

Yes.

  • Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion)
  • Record checklist findings and debate conclusion


Planning Committee Consensus

  • Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?

Yes. Tested in Bochum 2016, NA 2016, NA 2015, Vienna 2014

Connectathon test results summary

  • Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?

Yes.

  • Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?

Yes.

  • Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?

No option defined.

  • Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?

No.

  • Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?

Yes. HTTP(S) URL is widely used.

  • (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)

Yes.

  • Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?

One outstanding CP (CP-RAD-349)

David has already created one Invoke Image Display

Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Evaluation_of_Invoke_Image_Display&oldid=94406"