PCCTech Minutes 2015 02 23: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
Ejones (talk | contribs)
1,406 edits
No edit summary
Ejones (talk | contribs)
1,406 edits
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Monday 2025 02 23==
==Monday 2015 02 23 thru Thursday 02 27==
==Attendees==
==Attendees==
* Keith Boone
* Keith Boone
Line 21: Line 21:


===RECON on FHIR===
===RECON on FHIR===
* George led discussion, reviewed several sections, made some changes to document
* George/Emma led discussions, reviewed several sections, made some changes to document
* may need interaction with IHE-HL7 Joint Workgroup, in relation to using the provenance FHIR resource
* may need interaction with IHE-HL7 Joint Workgroup (HSI), in relation to using the provenance FHIR resource. Need a PSS work item for HSI with PCC and Patient Care as co-sponsors. HSI will sponsor
* discussion around using PCC-1 Share Content
* discussion around using PCC-1 Share Content
** will likely need a new transaction that provides more explicit/specific guidance
** will likely need a new transaction that provides more explicit/specific guidance
* Options section need to be implementation agnostic (remove specific references to CDA, PCC TF and FHIR)


===Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM)===
===Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM)===
* Brian led discussion, reviewed actor/transaction diagrams
* Brian led discussion, reviewed actor/transaction diagrams
* discussion resulted in clarity of actor/transaction definitions, and use of grouping
* discussion resulted in clarity of actor/transaction definitions, and use of grouping
* Clean up of various diagrams
* Clean up of Other dependencies section


===Device Clinical Bridge (DCB)===
===Device Clinical Bridge (DCB)===
Line 34: Line 37:
* actors and transactions we reworked based on committee feedback
* actors and transactions we reworked based on committee feedback
* '''next action:''' Alex to apply changes to DCM document for follow up session
* '''next action:''' Alex to apply changes to DCM document for follow up session
** - updated 2nd use case - clinical to billing use case.
** Clarification of Transaction (multiple back and forth until it is done - multiple activities can occur. Will be a complete business request)


===Workflow Discussion===
===Workflow Discussion===

Revision as of 08:41, 24 February 2015

Monday 2015 02 23 thru Thursday 02 27

Attendees

  • Keith Boone
  • Alex Lippitt
  • Isabelle G
  • George Cole
  • Mike Bohl
  • Tone Southerland
  • Thom Kuhn
  • Chris Lindop
  • Brian Reinhold
  • Dave Stumpf
  • Emma Jones
  • On phone - Dragon,


Minutes

Intro/Agenda Review

  • Request to record and make available the DCB discussions for those unable to attend the sessions due to time zone differences

RECON on FHIR

  • George/Emma led discussions, reviewed several sections, made some changes to document
  • may need interaction with IHE-HL7 Joint Workgroup (HSI), in relation to using the provenance FHIR resource. Need a PSS work item for HSI with PCC and Patient Care as co-sponsors. HSI will sponsor
  • discussion around using PCC-1 Share Content
    • will likely need a new transaction that provides more explicit/specific guidance
  • Options section need to be implementation agnostic (remove specific references to CDA, PCC TF and FHIR)

Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM)

  • Brian led discussion, reviewed actor/transaction diagrams
  • discussion resulted in clarity of actor/transaction definitions, and use of grouping
  • Clean up of various diagrams
  • Clean up of Other dependencies section

Device Clinical Bridge (DCB)

  • Alex led discussion, reviewed actors/transactions diagrams
  • actors and transactions we reworked based on committee feedback
  • next action: Alex to apply changes to DCM document for follow up session
    • - updated 2nd use case - clinical to billing use case.
    • Clarification of Transaction (multiple back and forth until it is done - multiple activities can occur. Will be a complete business request)

Workflow Discussion

  • Keith led discussion, reviewed selection of BPMN as the standard of choice
  • Dave Stumpf/Jesse Shiah from AgilePoint discussed reasons for using BPEL and/or XPDL
  • next action: for Dave to bring details to next session on market penetration levels for XPDL/BPEL vs BPMN

DAF

  • Keith led international discussion
    • decision made to not proceed further with international DAF efforts as there really does not seem to be much to do
  • Alex/Dragon led IHE USA extension discussion
    • DAF US extension is mostly complete
    • next steps - develop testing tools
    • would like to test at Connectathon 2016 (CAT16)

Tuesday 2025 02 24

Attendees

  • Keith Boone
  • Alex Lippitt
  • George Cole
  • Mike Bohl
  • Tone Southerland
  • Thom Kuhn
  • Chris Lindop
  • Brian Reinhold
  • Dave Stumpf
  • Emma Jones

RECON on FHIR

Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCCTech_Minutes_2015_02_23&oldid=83913"