Pharm Plan Agenda 2014.10.29: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:




=13:30 - 15:15 ISO liaison=
=13:30 - 14:00 Several Community Pharmacy related issues=
 
 
* PADV Issue: Deep analysis of code "CHANGE" revealed that it actually means "CHANGE + OK" (= implies the OK too). Related to that, the state "OK" actually means "(Unchanged) OK"
:* Question: Do we need a simple "CHANGE" which does not also imply the OK? Not needed for A, SA and CH -> at the moment it is an academic discussion
 
* PADV, PML issue: The issue appears only, when a PRE entry is referenced in a PADV or embedded in a PML + this entry contains an internal reference in the "Reason" element (e.g. to a diagnosis expressed in an Active Problems section)
:* Current solution in PADV: The section referenced is not included and instructions are given how to break the internal reference
:* Proposed solution: CP on PADV and PML to allow 0..* additional sections to be added in order not to break the internal references. Those section do NOT belong to the PADV/PML document itself, but are just inserted to fulfill the internal reference
 
 
=14:00 - 15:15 ISO liaison=
* Report on ISO meeting in Berlin (Jürgen)
* Report on ISO meeting in Berlin (Jürgen)
* Commenting on ISO/DIS 17523 "Requirements for electronic prescriptions"
* Commenting on ISO/DIS 17523 "Requirements for electronic prescriptions"

Revision as of 10:12, 24 October 2014

09:00 - 09:15 Welcome

  • Participants
  • Review and Approve Agenda


09:15 - 10:45 Medication Treatment

  • Proposal
  • Vision of the work ahead (Jürgen, Stephane)
  • Discussion
  • Formal approval of the new work-item proposal
  • Defining next steps


10:45 - 11:00 Break

11:00 - 12:30 Pharmacy Administration

  • Current work:
  • Wrapping up work done so far, open issues and how to continue(Jürgen)
  • Discussion
  • Defining next steps


12:30 - 13:30 Lunch

13:30 - 14:00 Several Community Pharmacy related issues

  • PADV Issue: Deep analysis of code "CHANGE" revealed that it actually means "CHANGE + OK" (= implies the OK too). Related to that, the state "OK" actually means "(Unchanged) OK"
  • Question: Do we need a simple "CHANGE" which does not also imply the OK? Not needed for A, SA and CH -> at the moment it is an academic discussion
  • PADV, PML issue: The issue appears only, when a PRE entry is referenced in a PADV or embedded in a PML + this entry contains an internal reference in the "Reason" element (e.g. to a diagnosis expressed in an Active Problems section)
  • Current solution in PADV: The section referenced is not included and instructions are given how to break the internal reference
  • Proposed solution: CP on PADV and PML to allow 0..* additional sections to be added in order not to break the internal references. Those section do NOT belong to the PADV/PML document itself, but are just inserted to fulfill the internal reference


14:00 - 15:15 ISO liaison

  • Report on ISO meeting in Berlin (Jürgen)
  • Commenting on ISO/DIS 17523 "Requirements for electronic prescriptions"
  • ISO DTS 19293 "Requirements for the record of Dispense Medicinal Products"
  • Discussion
  • Defining next steps
  • ISO/DTS 17251, "Business requirements for the exchange of structured dose instructions for medicinal products"
  • Discussion
  • Defining next steps


15:15 - 15:30 Break

15:30 - 16:30 Hospital-Community Use Cases Whitepaper

  • Discussion
  • Can it be published? Open issues?
  • Defining next steps


16:30 - 17:00 Schedule

  • Current version:
  • Open issues:
  • Status of IHE Joint meeting with ITI, PCC and QRPH: 24-25 February 2015, ASIP Santé Offices, Paris, France (Jürgen)
  • Planning of dedicated technicel TCons to work-items (work-item leaders)


17:00 Adjourn

Pharmacy Planning Committee