Reporting Whitepaper - Section 3: Difference between revisions
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==The Reporting Process== | ==The Reporting Process== | ||
Identify the "process nodes" that surround reporting. | |||
:* what input data is required | |||
* | :* what controls/constrains/triggers the activity | ||
* | :* what data is produced | ||
:* what is the nature of the activity | |||
* | :* what exceptions/variations exist | ||
* | |||
* | |||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
<<Consider notation to show which inputs/outputs/controls are critical vs which are supplemental>> | |||
<< | |||
<<Should we differentiate between nodes that add information vs ones that just transcode it vs ones that just move it?>> | <<Should we differentiate between nodes that add information vs ones that just transcode it vs ones that just move it?>> | ||
<<In different architectures, different nodes are located/connected differently>> | <<Insert Diagram of nodes and the data flow>> | ||
: <<In different architectures, different nodes are located/connected differently>> | |||
<<Need to map inpatient/outpatient, Dept vs Clinic vs …, Intra-Enterprise vs Inter-Enterprise>> | : <<Need to map inpatient/outpatient, Dept vs Clinic vs …, Intra-Enterprise vs Inter-Enterprise>> | ||
<<This exercise has not, but probably should, try to benefit from current workflow tools. BPMN, XPDL and BPEL are described and related here: [http://www.bpm.com/FeatureRO.asp?FeatureId=232] | <<This exercise has not, but probably should, try to benefit from current workflow tools. BPMN, XPDL and BPEL are described and related here: [http://www.bpm.com/FeatureRO.asp?FeatureId=232] | ||
| Line 40: | Line 27: | ||
* BPEL is an "execution language" the goal of which is to provide a definition of web service orchestration, the underlying sequence of interactions and the flow of data from point to point. You can take a BPMN diagram and produce BPEL, but it is difficult or impossible to recover the original BPMN diagram from the BPEL. This is not surprising since BPEL was not designed for process design interchange. | * BPEL is an "execution language" the goal of which is to provide a definition of web service orchestration, the underlying sequence of interactions and the flow of data from point to point. You can take a BPMN diagram and produce BPEL, but it is difficult or impossible to recover the original BPMN diagram from the BPEL. This is not surprising since BPEL was not designed for process design interchange. | ||
Keep in mind the needs of each of the large process(es) to which reporting contributes: | |||
:* Clinical | |||
:* Research | |||
:* Education | |||
:* Administration (operational) | |||
:* Management (planning) | |||
===Order Phase=== | |||
: Order Phase activities lead up to the Reporting work. | |||
| Line 93: | Line 82: | ||
Activity: Collecting together the necessary inputs for the Reading node and deciding "readiness". | Activity: Collecting together the necessary inputs for the Reading node and deciding "readiness". | ||
===Creation Phase=== | |||
:Creation Phase activities involve generation of the report. | |||
====Review/Reading/Interpretation/Dictation==== | ====Review/Reading/Interpretation/Dictation==== | ||
| Line 114: | Line 109: | ||
Some transcription services are using voice-recognition systems and a human “correctionist”. | Some transcription services are using voice-recognition systems and a human “correctionist”. | ||
A few sites put the voice-recognition on the “dictation” system itself in an attempt to compress most of the activities from Review to Signature into a single step. | A few sites put the voice-recognition on the “dictation” system itself in an attempt to compress most of the activities from Review to Signature into a single step. | ||
====Data Marshalling – Final==== | ====Data Marshalling – Final==== | ||
| Line 136: | Line 126: | ||
<Consider reworking this and the above to be one node which is "Verify with intent to Sign" and another with is "Verify for some other purpose" e.g. QC overread, etc.> | <Consider reworking this and the above to be one node which is "Verify with intent to Sign" and another with is "Verify for some other purpose" e.g. QC overread, etc.> | ||
===Distribution Phase=== | |||
:Distribution Phase activities involve getting the report to the consumers. Note that this grouping means a couple steps are listed out of sequence. Preliminary Access could happen after initial Transcription/Authoring was complete. | |||
====Preliminary Access==== | |||
Out: Draft Report | |||
Exceptions: Is this where we handle "recalled" reports, when there is an overread exception? | |||
====Urgent/Critical Results Notification==== | ====Urgent/Critical Results Notification==== | ||
| Line 159: | Line 161: | ||
Out: Report and/or notification, audit trail | Out: Report and/or notification, audit trail | ||
===Consumption Phase=== | |||
Consumption Phase activities involve using the contents of the report or output of the reporting process. | |||
====Order Closure==== | ====Order Closure==== | ||
| Line 182: | Line 190: | ||
Activity: | Activity: | ||
===Archiving Phase=== | |||
====Archival – Operation & Legal==== | ====Archival – Operation & Legal==== | ||
| Line 193: | Line 204: | ||
Who retrieves reports and where do they want to get them from? | Who retrieves reports and where do they want to get them from? | ||
==Next Step== | |||
Now all we have to do is connect the nodes according to the inputs/outputs, assign transaction numbers, choose a preferred encoding (and one or two transports) for each transaction, and consolidate any identical transactions. | |||
Revision as of 23:48, 8 July 2007
<Return to the main Reporting Whitepaper page>
The Reporting Process
Identify the "process nodes" that surround reporting.
- what input data is required
- what controls/constrains/triggers the activity
- what data is produced
- what is the nature of the activity
- what exceptions/variations exist
<<Consider notation to show which inputs/outputs/controls are critical vs which are supplemental>>
<<Should we differentiate between nodes that add information vs ones that just transcode it vs ones that just move it?>>
<<Insert Diagram of nodes and the data flow>>
- <<In different architectures, different nodes are located/connected differently>>
- <<Need to map inpatient/outpatient, Dept vs Clinic vs …, Intra-Enterprise vs Inter-Enterprise>>
<<This exercise has not, but probably should, try to benefit from current workflow tools. BPMN, XPDL and BPEL are described and related here: [1]
- BPMN (Business Process Modeling Notation) is a standardized graphical notation for drawing business processes in a workflow. BPMN’s primary goal is to be readily understandable by all business stakeholders and thus serve as common language to bridge the communication gap that frequently occurs between business process design and subsequent implementation.
- XPDL is effectively the file format or "serialization" of BPMN. It offers a one-for-one representation of the original BPMN process diagram. Its primary goal is to store and exchange the process diagrams, or specifically to allow one tool to model a process diagram, and another to read the diagram and edit, another to "run" the process model on an XPDL-compliant BPM engine, and so on.
- BPEL is an "execution language" the goal of which is to provide a definition of web service orchestration, the underlying sequence of interactions and the flow of data from point to point. You can take a BPMN diagram and produce BPEL, but it is difficult or impossible to recover the original BPMN diagram from the BPEL. This is not surprising since BPEL was not designed for process design interchange.
Keep in mind the needs of each of the large process(es) to which reporting contributes:
- Clinical
- Research
- Education
- Administration (operational)
- Management (planning)
Order Phase
- Order Phase activities lead up to the Reporting work.
Registration
In:
Out: Patient Account
Ordering
In: Patient Account
Out: Order
Scheduling
In: Order
Out: Worklist(item)
Activity: (Clarify as specifically assigning a time slot or just putting it on the Dept Worklist)
Exceptions: the appointment may be set before the order is created.
Data Acquisition
In: Worklist
Out: Acquired Data (Images/Radiology Data); Performed Procedure Details (Radiation Dose, Contrast administered/lot number, Description of Performed Procedure, Procedure Log, Tech Comments, Checklist completion (check consent, check pregnancy, etc.), Billable Materials Usage, Billable Tasks Performed)
Activity: Perform the requested scan, etc.
Exceptions: Handling repeats? Aborted procedures? Additional Consents?
Data Processing
In: Current Radiology Data, [Worklist]
Out: Additional Radiology Data
Activity: Perform requested 3D Reconstructions, CAD, etc.
Data Marshalling - Initial
In: Radiology Data (Current, Additional, Analysis/Measurements, Priors, Prior Reports), Order (Reason for Study), Other Orders (Recent & Prior), History/Allergies/Problems/Medications, Lab Data (Current, Prior), Pathology Data (Current, Prior), Patient History Sheet, Tech Interview Sheet
Out: Notification of Readiness
Activity: Collecting together the necessary inputs for the Reading node and deciding "readiness".
Creation Phase
- Creation Phase activities involve generation of the report.
Review/Reading/Interpretation/Dictation
In: Worklist, Marshalled Data, [Notification of Readiness]
Out: Voice Audio, [Proto Report], [References to Images?] Delay Flags, Followup Flags (e.g. Mammo), Critical Results Flags
Activity: The radiologist may set several “delay flags” (see IHE Teaching Files and Clinical Trials) indicating that the interpretation activities are complete, but the report should be considered incomplete until the associated lab/pathology/etc data has been marshaled for inclusion.
In common cases the reading may be performed in parallel by two different resources (blind overread, QC, resident/attending)
Transcription/Authoring
In: Worklist, Voice Audio, [Proto Report], [References to Images?]
Out: Draft Report
This step will have several different flavors.
Traditionally it is performed by a transcription service located somewhere else with a human listening to the audio and entering simple electronic report text. The text may be a single “block” or may be separated into several sections with titles.
Some transcription services are using voice-recognition systems and a human “correctionist”. A few sites put the voice-recognition on the “dictation” system itself in an attempt to compress most of the activities from Review to Signature into a single step.
Data Marshalling – Final
In: Delay Flags, Draft Report, Referenced Additional Data (see Delay Flags)
Out: Draft Report (Updated with delayed data)
<Are there other kinds of “follow-up flags?”>
Verification/Correction/Confirmation/Over-read
In: Draft Report, Voice Audio?
Out: Final Report
Signature/Finalization
Out: Signed Report
<Consider reworking this and the above to be one node which is "Verify with intent to Sign" and another with is "Verify for some other purpose" e.g. QC overread, etc.>
Distribution Phase
- Distribution Phase activities involve getting the report to the consumers. Note that this grouping means a couple steps are listed out of sequence. Preliminary Access could happen after initial Transcription/Authoring was complete.
Preliminary Access
Out: Draft Report
Exceptions: Is this where we handle "recalled" reports, when there is an overread exception?
Urgent/Critical Results Notification
In: Order (Referring), PWP Contact Info, [Critical Results Flags], Signed Report
Out: Signed Report, Notification
Note this could also happen at prelim.
Receipt of Report? of Notification?
In: Signed Report
Out: Confirmation?
<Should we be thinking about receipt of the notification (in which case this node might be part of the previous node), or receipt of the report?>
Typical Notification
Should Order Placer get a reference to the report in the status msg so to help the ordering physician who checks status be able to retrieve the report from the Enterprise Report Repository (HIS, EMR, etc) more easily? And do we differentiate between the Report Completion defining the end point, or do we need to receive completion of each of the composite steps? <<dar: I'd vote for 'yes' and 'completion of each of the composite steps')
Distribution
In: Prelim or Signed Report, recipients, distribution method for each recipient (e.g. fax, email with link, page, etc.)
Out: Report and/or notification, audit trail
Consumption Phase
Consumption Phase activities involve using the contents of the report or output of the reporting process.
Order Closure
Activity: Feedback to Order Placer that it has been filled.
Note that this step might actually happen immediately after signature/finalization and the notification steps happen in parallel.
Procedure Coding/Findings Coding
In: Order, Performed Procedure Details, Signed Report, Procedure Codes (what's been assigned so far)
Out: Procedure Codes
Activity:
Even rule-based coding will involve constant maintenance as new billing codes appear and payor policies and hospital policies change and department procedures change.
Natural Language Processing (NLP) can help transform inputs to outputs.
Billing
In: Order, Performed Procedure Details, Procedure Codes
Out: Bill
Activity:
Archiving Phase
Archival – Operation & Legal
In: Current Report
Out:
Recording the test and findings in the patients EHR, incorporating the report into the medical record.
Who will archive copies of the report (for what scope/timeframe/purpose)?
Who retrieves reports and where do they want to get them from?
Next Step
Now all we have to do is connect the nodes according to the inputs/outputs, assign transaction numbers, choose a preferred encoding (and one or two transports) for each transaction, and consolidate any identical transactions.