PCCPlan Minutes 2013 10 09: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LHeermann (talk | contribs)
LHeermann (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Attendees:  Laura Heermann Langford, Laura Bright, Charles Rica, Bruno Grossin,
Attendees:  Laura Heermann Langford, Laura Bright, Charles Rica, Bruno Grossin, Denise Downing


Call in Attendees:  Emma Jones, George Cole, Dave Stumpf, Lisa Nelson,  
Call in Attendees:  Emma Jones, George Cole, Dave Stumpf, Lisa Nelson,  
Line 6: Line 6:
===Reconciliation of Interventions, Goals and Care Providers ===
===Reconciliation of Interventions, Goals and Care Providers ===
* Emma Jones
* Emma Jones
 
**Discussion:
** Review of the proposed profile.  
*** Discussion of other areas that we may want to reconcile and to look at doing them now instead of leaving for future profile workItems under consideration are:
What do we mean by "intervention"? Need to define this in the detailed proposal.  
Should we consider other things that need reconciliation? -
1. Advance directives
2. Providers and Pharmacy
3. Family members and Contacts
4. Patient preferences
5. Coded Functional Status
6. Medical Devices (would this go in the "intervention"?)
7. Review of Systems
8. Discharge Instructions (hospital)  (would this go in the "intervention"?)
9. Instructions Section  (would this go in the "intervention"?)
10. Discharge Diagnosis
11. Hospital Discharge Results Summary
12. Diet and Nutrition  (would this go in the "intervention"?)
13. Social History?
Some things have privacy and security risks.  
   
Reconciling Vitals and Results as another profile is discouraged because results is done by other means and vitals are typically collected and utilized locally - this was discussed as part of the SMART project (Per George C.)

Revision as of 10:58, 9 October 2013

Attendees: Laura Heermann Langford, Laura Bright, Charles Rica, Bruno Grossin, Denise Downing

Call in Attendees: Emma Jones, George Cole, Dave Stumpf, Lisa Nelson,


Reconciliation of Interventions, Goals and Care Providers

  • Emma Jones
    • Discussion:

What do we mean by "intervention"? Need to define this in the detailed proposal.

Should we consider other things that need reconciliation? - 1. Advance directives 2. Providers and Pharmacy 3. Family members and Contacts 4. Patient preferences 5. Coded Functional Status 6. Medical Devices (would this go in the "intervention"?) 7. Review of Systems 8. Discharge Instructions (hospital) (would this go in the "intervention"?) 9. Instructions Section (would this go in the "intervention"?) 10. Discharge Diagnosis 11. Hospital Discharge Results Summary 12. Diet and Nutrition (would this go in the "intervention"?) 13. Social History?

Some things have privacy and security risks.

Reconciling Vitals and Results as another profile is discouraged because results is done by other means and vitals are typically collected and utilized locally - this was discussed as part of the SMART project (Per George C.)