Rad Tech Minutes 2013-10-08: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:* Reporting Workflow Revision - proposal withdrawn pending greater interest and further development of underlying standards (RESTful interfaces) | :* Reporting Workflow Revision - proposal withdrawn pending greater interest and further development of underlying standards (RESTful interfaces) | ||
:* Mobile Access to Health Documents for Imaging - estimated work requirement 25-30% depending on whether scope includes XCA linkages | :* Mobile Access to Health Documents for Imaging - estimated work requirement 25-30% depending on whether scope includes XCA linkages | ||
:* Breast Tomosynthesis - | :* Breast Tomosynthesis - estimated work requirement 35%; major challenge will be organizing input of key players | ||
:* Rad TF Maintenance - 35-40% | |||
Revision as of 08:53, 8 October 2013
Participants
- Fred Behlen
- Chris Carr
- David Clunie
- Wim Corbijn
- Brad Genereaux
- Renate Hoecker
- Chris Lindop
- Walco van Loon
- Kevin O'Donnell
- Antje Schroeder
Minutes
- Reviewed detailed profile proposals to prepare for work item selection vote
- Reporting Workflow Revision - proposal withdrawn pending greater interest and further development of underlying standards (RESTful interfaces)
- Mobile Access to Health Documents for Imaging - estimated work requirement 25-30% depending on whether scope includes XCA linkages
- Breast Tomosynthesis - estimated work requirement 35%; major challenge will be organizing input of key players
- Rad TF Maintenance - 35-40%