QRPH Tech Mtg Minutes 2013-03-18: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
No edit summary
 
Line 28: Line 28:


*Research Subject Matching
*Research Subject Matching
**Since the profile covers both provider and patient research matching, the name will change from ‘Research Subject Matching’ to just ‘Research Matching’.
**HL7’s Clinical Research Filtered Query Service Function Model (CRFQ SFM) does similar functionality.  Landen will review CRFQ and determine how it works in.  Since this is an expired DSTU or the HL7 RCRIM domain, with no action since July of 2010, we will use it as a reference document only. 
**Amit recommends a research document that shows how the processes in Research Matching feed into the processes defined in RPE and CRPC.  Landen will do a ‘funnel’ diagram as a first conceptual representation of these relationships.
**The publish/subscribe use case requires a process  flow diagram.
**The actor/transaction diagram needs to expand, based on the discussion as captured in the display document.


*Change Proposals Review and Working Session
*Change Proposals Review and Working Session

Latest revision as of 12:44, 18 March 2013

Attendees

  • Amit Popat
  • Arthur Cheung, (Mobigator)
  • Landen Bain
  • Clifford Tse (Mobigator)
  • Gokce B. Laleci
  • John Eichwald
  • John Stamm
  • Lauren Lemieux (ACOG)
  • Patty Craig
  • Didi Davis
  • Ken Poole
  • Mark Nelson
  • Lisa Nelson
  • Lara Tramontan
  • Jen Foltz (CDC)
  • Nancy Ramirez
  • Jeff Berry
  • Eric Larson
  • Michelle Williamson
  • Steve Moore
  • Jen Foltz
  • Nichole Drye-Mayo

Minutes

  • Introductions
  • Research Subject Matching
    • Since the profile covers both provider and patient research matching, the name will change from ‘Research Subject Matching’ to just ‘Research Matching’.
    • HL7’s Clinical Research Filtered Query Service Function Model (CRFQ SFM) does similar functionality. Landen will review CRFQ and determine how it works in. Since this is an expired DSTU or the HL7 RCRIM domain, with no action since July of 2010, we will use it as a reference document only.
    • Amit recommends a research document that shows how the processes in Research Matching feed into the processes defined in RPE and CRPC. Landen will do a ‘funnel’ diagram as a first conceptual representation of these relationships.
    • The publish/subscribe use case requires a process flow diagram.
    • The actor/transaction diagram needs to expand, based on the discussion as captured in the display document.
  • Change Proposals Review and Working Session
    • CRPC – CP63 – Amit to reach out to Vassil on Status
    • CP64 – Amit to reach out to PCC Co-chairs to discuss
    • CP65 - LDHP – need to determine if LDS or CCDA used going forward?
  • Data Element Exchange (DEX)
    • Reviewed Volume one document and discussed some volume 2 requirements
  • Vital Records Death Reporting
    • Lori and Michelle reviewed current document with committee.
    • Action – Need to discuss with other domains actor naming for technical framework. Example VFDR Information Source and VFDR Information Recipient – should these be more generic or reference VFDR? These cannot be reused based on HL7 v2.x message reference – discuss with other IHE domains for consistency in technical framework.
    • Action – Review VFDR with upcoming RFD CPs.
  • Healthy Weight
    • Committee members will monitor HL7 Implementation Guide planned to be balloted in May HL7 meeting. Potential risk if HL7 ballot does not pass May ballot and must move to September ballot. This was added to open issues.
  • Wrap-up / Homework / Action Item Review / Agenda Updates
  • Adjourn
Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=QRPH_Tech_Mtg_Minutes_2013-03-18&oldid=66557"